Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 6;39(1):126. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04699-4

Table 3.

Characteristics and management of AL

Characteristics Non-AS group (n = 101) AS group (n = 28) p-value
Anastomotic leakagea 0.316
   Grade A 16 (16) 2 (7)
   Grade B 51 (50) 15 (54)
   Grade C 34 (34) 11 (39)
POD of AL diagnosis, db 7 (6–13) 7 (5–16) 0.861
Anastomotic heightb 6 (4–9) 5 (4–7) 0.456
   ≤ 5 cm 47 (46) 14 (50)
   6–10 cm 38 (38) 9 (32)
   > 10 cm 16 (16) 5 (18)
Extent of the anastomotic defectb 20 (9–40) 50 (27–71) 0.011
   Up to 24% 71 (70) 14 (50)
   25–49% 18 (18) 9 (32)
   50–74% 8 (8) 4 (14)
   75–100% 4 (4) 1 (4)
Management of AL
   ENPT 59 (60) 17 (60) 0.832
   Cyclesb 4 (2–6) 5 (3–7) 0.774
   Surgical revision* 34 (34) 11 (39) 0.911
   Antibiotic therapy 84 (83) 24 (86) 0.897
LOS, db 20 (14–35) 23 (16–43) 0.297
Ostomy reversal 74 (73) 22 (78) 0.576
   POD of ostomy reversal, db 202 (169–275) 318 (192–416) 0.014
Re-ostomy 34 (33) 10 (36) 0.841
   Reversal of the re-ostomy 10 (30) 1 (10) 0.076

POD postoperative day; AL anastomotic leakage; ENPT endoscopic negative pressure therapy; LOS length of stay; d day

aAs defined by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer

bValues are median (interquartile range)

*Eight patients in the non-AS and two in the AS group underwent ENPT additionally to surgical revision