Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 6;21:178. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02453-4

Table 3.

GPGV incidences and spatial analysis within vineyards

Vineyard Year Total Healthy GPGV incidence Latent Symptomatic Runs analysis Gradient
[n] [n] [n] [%] [n] [%] [n] [%] Along rows Across rows Rows Plants r2 Direction
GEM 2019 457 356 101 22.1 66 14 35 8 ns ***
2020 306 151 33.0 117 26 34 7 ns ns
2021 311 146 31.9 113 25 33 7 ns ns 1–6 1–39 0.70 Across rows
HEC 2018 224 112 112 50.0 86 38 26 12 *** *** 1–9 1–31 0.73 Across rows
2019 46 178 79.5 137 61 41 18 ** **
2020 30 194 86.6 135 60 59 26
2021 3 221 98.7 151 67 70 31
NIM 2019 478 81 397 83.1 344 72 53 11 *** *** 1–6 1–41 0.98 Across rows
2020 37 441 92.3 385 81 56 12
2021 50 428 89.5 310 65 118 25
REI 2018 375 166 209 55.7 93 25 116 31 *** ***
2019 107 268 71.5 85 23 183 49
2020 91 284 75.7 88 23 196 52

Listed are the number (n) of healthy, GPGV latent infected and GPGV symptomatic vines of all four vineyard observed in this study between the years 2018 and 2021. Runs analyses and the presence of infection gradients were calculated by PATCHY [27]

Tukey HSD test: ns not significant, **p-value < 0.01; ***p-value < 0.001; − no relevant results due to too high GPGV incidences

r2 = correlation coefficient