Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 7;24:144. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01065-z

Table 4.

Shared decision-making process during serious illness conversations in LST

Decision-making process Total
(N = 325)
Baseline
(N = 157)
Intervention
(N = 168)
p
Goal of care (n, %) 0.835
 cure 158(48.6) 79(50.3) 79(47.0)
 relieve symptoms 143(44.0) 67(42.7) 76(45.2)
 palliative care 24(7.4) 11(7.0) 13(7.7)
Impact factors for decision on LST (n, %)
 Patient age 213(72.0) 91(71.1) 122(72.6) 0.772
 Life quality 124(41.9) 58(45.3) 66(39.3) 0.298
 Prognosis by medical team 116(39.2) 48(37.5) 68(40.5) 0.603
 Injury caused by intubation/CPR 93(31.4) 50(39.1) 43(25.6) 0.013*
 Patient value 79(26.7) 37(28.9) 42(25.0) 0.452
 Treatment expenditure 14(4.7) 7(5.5) 7(4.2) 0.601
Patient decisional capacity confirmed per proxy (n, %) 158(57.5) 60(56.0) 98(58.3) 0.543
Patient value expressed (n, %) 93(28.6) 47(29.9) 46(27.4) 0.611
Decision on LST (n, %)
 Consent on intubation 206(63.6) 106(67.9) 100(59.5) 0.115
 Consent on CPR 183(56.5) 97(62.2) 86(51.2) 0.046*
Final decision documented (n, %)
 Decision reversal on intubation 8(2.5) 6(3.8) 2(1.2) 0.126
 Decision reversal on CPR 18(5.5) 13(8.3) 5(3.0) 0.037*

* p < 0.05