Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 22;103(9):103998. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103998

Table 5.

Effects of MLE on egg quality.

Items Control group HELP groups with MLE levels (%)
SEM P-value
0.00 0.04 0.40 0.80 1.20 A L Q
Eggshell thickness (mm) 0.33 0.35 0.38 0.37 0.33 0.37 0.01 0.298 0.644 0.718
Egg weight (g) 65.11b 57.62a 59.86a 65.99b 65.64b 61.87a 0.87 <0.001 0.073 <0.001
Egg shape index 1.30 1.29 1.31 1.34 1.32 1.33 0.01 0.250 0.043 0.106
Eggshell weight (g) 10.24 9.36 9.50 10.07 10.64 9.91 0.17 0.271 0.134 0.073
Yolk color 7.86a 8.57ab 8.63ab 8.88b 8.88b 9.38b 0.13 0.019 0.192 0.111
Egg yolk weight (g) 17.70ab 16.27a 16.36a 18.58b 18.16b 17.61ab 0.19 <0.001 0.514 <0.001
Albumen height (mm) 8.77 8.75 9.03 9.27 9.57 9.21 0.12 0.304 0.142 0.034
Haugh unit 91.60 94.38 94.92 95.62 95.87 95.86 0.69 0.483 0.361 0.597
Eggshell strength (N) 32.36 33.82 32.26 36.01 36.81 35.67 0.66 0.234 0.457 0.609

Abbreviations: A, P value of one-way ANOVA; L, P value of linear analysis; Q, P value of quadratic analysis.

a,b,c

In the same row, different superscript lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).