Table 2.
Future directions for sarcopenic obesity research. Based on information from the ESPEN/EASO consensus definition [26] and meeting proceedings [27••]
| Future directions |
|---|
| • Use the current ESPEN/EASO consensus definition for greater homogeneity across the literature. |
| • Distinguish more clearly between the primary and secondary forms of the condition to devise treatment strategies tailored to each type. |
| • Explore the role of hormonal status (e.g., cortisol, testosterone, growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 axis) on its pathogenesis and pathophysiology. |
| • Explore the cross-talk between bone, muscle, and adipose tissue related to age-related osteopenia-osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and overweight-obesity. |
| • Develop or validate age, sex, and ethnicity-based cut points for research and clinical practice consideration. |
| • Develop or validate screening methods, such as calf circumference. |
| • Confirm the reliability of using calf circumference, adjusted for body mass index, as an indicator of skeletal muscle mass. |
| • Compare the utility of different functional tests in various settings. |
| • Validate the use of different body composition adjustment methods for diagnosis. |
| • Study the prognostic ability of the proposed ESPEN/EASO consensus definition staging system. |
| • Increase the number and quality of randomized controlled trials studying the therapeutic effects of exercise, nutritional, pharmacologic, or combined interventions. |
| • Identify effective strategies for the mitigation of muscle loss during weight loss. |