Table 2.

Study characteristics for publications that assessed psychometric properties of outcome measures for pediatric participants who use lower limb prostheses (LLP)

Study characteristics			Sample characteristics
Measure	Article	Study design	Total sample size	LLP user sample size	Mean/Age range (years)	Level of amputation/limb difference	Prosthesis design classification	Etiology
Gait Outcomes Assessment List for Lower Limb Differences (GOAL-LD)a	Dermott et al. [6]	Prospective cohort study	25	1	13.7/9–18	Transtibial	Not reported	Fibular hemimelia (16) Post-traumatic growth arrest (5) Developmental (4)
Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA)b	Pierce et al. [9]	Prospective cohort study	37	25	12.4/8–19	Symes (8) Knee disarticulation (6) Transtibial (5) Transfemoral (2) Rotationplasty (2)	Below knee Above knee	Congenital (16) Osteosarcoma (4) Infection (3) Trauma (1) Other (1)
Child amputee prosthetics project-prosthesis satisfaction inventoryc	Pruitt et al. [10]	Retrospective Cohort Study	97	57	8.1/1–17	Not reported	Not reported	Congenital (76) Acquired (21)
Child Amputee Prosthetics Project- Functional Scale Index (CAPP-FSI)c	Pruitt et al. [11]	Retrospective Cohort Study	65	43	Not reported/8–17	Not reported	Not reported	Congenital (49) Acquired (16)
Lower limb function questionnaired	Funk et al. [14]	Prospective Cohort Study: Validity Evaluations	40	9	16.3/13–25	Not reported	Below knee Above knee	Not reported

^aFunding provided by the Government of Ontario, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the University of Toronto Open Fellowship, SickKids Continuing Professional Development Fund, and Holland Bloorview Graduate Student Support. ^bFunding source not reported. ^cFunding provided by grants from the Shriners Hospitals for Crippled Children Research Fund and the Milo Brooks Foundation for Limb Deficient Children. ^dFunding provided through “private fundraising by individual researchers.”