Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;2(1):100516. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100516

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies comparing mitral valve-in-valve versus redo surgical mitral valve replacement in patients with degenerated mitral prostheses.

Simard et al,12 2022 Zubarevich et al,11 2021 Khan et al,9 2021 Simonetto et al,6 2021 Osman et al,13 2020 Kamioka et al,10 2018 Murzi et al,8 2017
Type of the study Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective Retrospective
Follow-up duration 5 y 3 y In-hospital 1 y 30 d 1 y 2 y
Location United States Germany United States Italy United States United States Italy
Number of centers Single center Single center National registry 4 centers National registry 3 centers Single center
Sample size 215 74 2745 78 1789 121 61
TMVR access site Transseptal (97.7%), transapical (2.3%) Transapical (100%) N/A Transseptal (55%), transapical (45%) N/A Transseptal (77%), transapical (23%) Transapical (100%)
TMVR valve type SAPIEN, SAPIEN XT, SAPIEN 3, SAPIEN 3 Ultra SAPIEN XT, SAPIEN 3 N/A N/A N/A SAPIEN, SAPIEN XT, SAPIEN 3 SAPIEN XT, SAPIEN 3

TMVR, transcatheter mitral valve replacement; N/A; not available.