Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 17;1(6):100449. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100449

Table 3.

Comparison of approved mechanical circulatory support devices and mechanical circulatory support under investigation with publicly available data

IABP Impella CP (Abiomed) Impella 5.5 (Abiomed) Peripheral VA ECMO Aortix (Procyrion)a ModulHeart (Puzzle Medical Devices)a
Device description Counter-pulsation balloon 1 single microaxial pump 1 single microaxial pump Extracorporeal centrifugal pumps with oxygenator membrane 1 single microaxial pump 3 individual microaxial pumps assembled in parallel in a self-expandable anchor
Position Thoracic aorta Transvalvular Transvalvular Iliofemoral artery and vein Abdominal aorta Abdominal aorta
Access 8F catheter, femoral artery 14F catheter, femoral artery 23F catheter, axillary artery ∼15-24F catheter, femoral artery;
∼19-25F catheter, femoral vein
18F catheter, femoral artery 22F catheter, femoral artery, 16F catheter next generation
Working RPM N/A 23,000 RPM for 0.9 L/min, up to 46,000 RPM for 3.7 L/min 17,000 RPM for up to 1.9 L/min; 33,000 RPM for up to 5.5 L/min ∼4,000 RPM for ∼4 L/min 25,000 RPM for ∼3.5 L/min 14,000 RPM for 4 L/min
Maximum flow rate N/A Up to 3.7 L/min at 46,000 RPM Up to 5.5 L/min at 33,000 RPM Up to ∼8 L/min at ∼5,000 RPM Up to 5 L/min at 30,000 RPM Up to 10 L/min at 25,000 RPM
Indications High-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock High-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock Cardiogenic shock Cardiogenic shock High-risk PCI, ADHF High-risk PCI, ADHF, CHF
Pros Small insertion profile; low cost; increased coronary flow Direct LV unloading; approximately small insertion profile Direct LV unloading Concomitant gas exchange; high flow rate Increased renal flow; conceptually no stroke risk Increased renal flow; self-expandable nitinol anchor; low blood damage; conceptually no stroke risk; high flow rate
Cons Indirect LV unloading; poor degree of unloading Bleeding; pump stability issues; limited flow rate; hemolysis and vWF degradation; risk of stroke; contraindicated/not ideal in patients with AS, AI, or mechanical AVR; current device not suitable for outpatient use Large insertion profile; surgical access; pump stability issues; hemolysis and vWF degradation; risk of stroke; contraindicated/not ideal in patients with AS, AI, or mechanical AVR; current device not suitable for outpatient use Retrograde flow; no LV unloading; large insertion profile; bleeding; limb ischemia Indirect LV unloading; large insertion profile; risk of blood damage because of a high rotational speed Indirect LV unloading; large insertion profile in current version (upcoming version <16F and supporting axillary access)

ADHF, acute decompensated heart failure; AI, aortic insufficiency; AS, aortic stenosis; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CHF, chronic heart failure; VA-ECMO, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; LV, left ventricle; N/A, not applicable; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RPM, revolutions per minute; vWF, von Willebrand factor.

a

Investigational devices.