Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 27;39(7):674–682. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae048

Table 1.

Village characteristis

Mean (GOV) Mean (NGO) Diff.
Number of households in the village 137.5 169.5 −32.05 (33.72)
Prop. of literate population in the village 0.757 0.782 −0.0250 (0.0514)
Prop. of villages with agriculture as main livelihood 0.864 0.909 −0.0455 (0.0977)
Prop. of villages with livestock as main livelihood 0.364 0.455 −0.0909 (0.151)
Prop. of villages with casual labour as main livelihood 0.909 0.909 0 (0.0887)
Prop. of villages in dry-land farming low land 0.455 0.455 0 (0.154)
Prop. of villages reachable by car in all weather 0.727 0.591 0.136 (0.145)
Prop. of villages that have electricity (grid) 0.227 0.136 0.0909 (0.118)
Prop. of villages with primary school 0.545 0.591 −0.0455 (0.153)
Prop. of villages with local market 0.909 0.955 −0.0455 (0.0775)
Average distance to large market (km) 34.45 36.59 −2.136 (6.360)
Average distance to small market (km) 24 29 −5 (4.800)
Prop. of villages with a health facility 0.182 0.182 0 (0.119)
Prop. of villages that have a midwife 0.227 0.273 −0.0455 (0.133)
Prop. of villages without any water shortage 0.364 0.364 0 (0.148)

Notes: The table presents the balance check of village characteristics for government (GOV) and NGO cash delivery model. Data are from the 2016 census data collection. ***P <0.01, **P <0.05, *P <0.1. The sample includes all villages: 22 from GOV and 22 from NGO.