Abstract
The utilization of actinium-225 (225Ac) radionuclides in targeted alpha therapy for cancer was initially outlined in 1993. Over the past two decades, substantial research has been conducted, encompassing the establishment of 225Ac production methods, various preclinical investigations, and several clinical studies. Currently, there is a growing number of compounds labeled with 225Ac that are being developed and tested in clinical trials. In response to the increasing demand for this nuclide, production facilities are either being built or have already been established. This article offers a concise summary of the present state of clinical advancements in compounds labeled with 225Ac. It outlines various processes involved in the production and purification of 225Ac to cater to the growing demand for this radionuclide. The article examines the merits and drawbacks of different procedures, delves into preclinical trials, and discusses ongoing clinical trials.
Keywords: Actinium-225, alpha emitter, nuclear medicine, oncology, targeted alpha therapy
INTRODUCTION
The reckless enhancement and expansion of unusual cells in different organs of the body are known as cancer. Together with large and latest technological advancements in oncology, treatments of advanced cancer are still a challenging phenomenon. Oncological treatments can be classified as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. In addition, there are several types of therapies like hormone therapy, gene expression modulators, inducers of apoptosis, and signal transduction inhibitors, and more are available clinically or under observation. Various deadly cancers might be controlled and toxicity in normal tissue could be reduced by new emerging targeted therapies. In radiation oncology, targeted alpha therapy (TAT) is such kind of systemic therapy that can control the disease. In the field of radiation oncology, TAT stands out as a systemic treatment capable of disease control. Isotopes such as actinium-225 (225Ac), 212Bi, 212Pb, 223Ra, 149Tb, 227Th, and 211At have demonstrated promise in both preclinical investigations and clinical trials.[1] The nature of these particles is also important because of their biological effect. The primary characteristics of an α particle are its linear energy transfer (LET) and its distance traveled (path length).[2]
α particles of higher LET (100 KeV/μm), increased energy (2–10 MeV), and path length (50–100 μm) have relatively higher DNA double-strand breaking probability than β emitters although it generates high toxicity. The short path length of α-emitters lessens irradiation in surrounding healthy cells. Therefore, the potential for unintended radiation exposure to undamaged bodily tissues and organs may be minimized. 225Ac emerges as a compelling choice TAT due to its capacity to generate multiple daughter isotopes through a sequence of four α particles and two β particles decays within a relatively brief timeframe. This attribute enhances the therapeutic impact of substances labeled with 225Ac.[3] The cancer therapy community and pharmaceutical industries have taken under consideration the potentiality of α particles for conjugated antibodies, drugs, and antibody conjugation. The direction of pathways has also created the ambiance through so many clinical and preclinical studies.[4] However, the hindrance in the progress of TAT has consistently been the limitations associated with half-lives and availability. For a few years, increasing knowledge in the production process and radiochemistry has made α-emitters more demandable in cancer treatment.
Radionuclides used in TAT need to be conjugated to target vectors such as nanocarriers, peptides, biomolecules, monoclonal antibodies (MABs), and small-molecule inhibitors. The success of targeted radiotherapy relies on the trajectory of its radionuclide, the behavior of particles, and their biological effects which need to align with given tumor mass, size, heterogeneity, and radio sensitivity.[5]
225Ac emerges as a highly promising choice for TAT owing to its favorable characteristics. These include a prolonged half-life of 10 days, which aligns effectively with targeting vectors based on antibodies. In addition, its four high-energy alpha emissions make it exceptionally effective in causing cell lethality.[6,7,8] In both laboratory-based and living organism-based models, 225Ac demonstrates notably higher potency compared to its daughter nuclide, 213Bi.[9] The augmented effectiveness of 225Ac in comparison to 213Bi (T1/2 ~ 46 min) can be ascribed to its significantly longer half-life, which is 313 times greater, along with the emission of three additional alpha particles.[10] In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current progress in clinical research involving 225Ac-labeled compounds. We discuss the synthesis and purification processes of 225Ac to meet the increasing demand for this radioactive element, evaluate the efficacy and limitations of different production methods, and review both preclinical and clinical trials conducted. Through this analysis, we aim to offer insights into the advancements, challenges, and potential applications of 225Ac in TAT.
ACTINIUM-225
225Ac has 32 isotopes and is the first substance of the actinide series. 228Ac and 227Ac are naturally formed through the decay sequences of 232Th and 235U, respectively. 225Ac from the 237Np decay chain which disappeared in nature and then manufactured again and its disintegration takes six steps to reach stable nuclei which have a half-life of 10 days. The production of 225Ac and its daughter 213Bi is derived from 233U, engendered during a scientific endeavor encompassing the neutron bombardment of 232Th in the 1960s.[11] 233U has been directed to 229Th (T1/2 ~ 7340 year). A portion of 229Ac is also collected from the decay of 233Th recently.[12] Figure 1 shows the decay scheme of 225Ac.
Figure 1.
Decay scheme of actinium-225
The key challenge for using 225Ac in TAT that is preventing to reach its complete clinical efficacy is the inadequacy of the quantities of 225Ac producible by prevailing methodologies, limiting its viability for widespread clinical applications. The total estimated production of 225Ac is 63 GBq/year, which is not adequate for the clinical and preclinical experiments.[13] An amount of 26.64 GBq is available at the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering (IPPE) in Obninsk, Russia. Furthermore, the same quantity of pure 225Ac has been supplied per year by ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) since 1997. The Institute for Transuranium Elements in Karlsruhe, Germany (ITU) oversees a diminutive 229Th source endowed with the capacity to generate a maximum of 12.95 GBq of 225Ac.[14] Various research laboratories are currently exploring alternative production methods utilizing high-energy accelerators. It is anticipated that the ongoing investigations will lead to solutions for the production challenges in the coming years.[15,16,17,18,19] In the clinical field, recent demand for 225Ac is almost 185 GBq per year based on the use of 225Ac for therapy, and the future estimated demand is about 200–400 GBq per year.[20] Consequently, few processes have been developed to meet the demand of 225Ac. Figure-2 gives a comparison of various production methods of 225Ac in terms of production yield per year.
Figure 2.
Daily production of actinium-225 through different production methods across various laboratories
GENERATION PROCEDURES
225Ac production by Th-GEx method
The generator method, considered the most convenient and promising approach, is used to produce 225Ac by isolating it from the parent radionuclide 229Th. This parent radionuclide is created through the decay process of 233U. This 233U is produced in nuclear reactors through a specific reaction where 232Th absorbs a neutron (232Th [n, γ]) and transforms into 232Th, which then decays with a half-life of 23.5 min to form 233Pa (233Th [β, 23.5 min] → 233Pa). This 233Pa undergoes subsequent decay with a radioactive half-life of 27.4 days, ultimately culminating in the formation of 233U (233Pa [β, 27.4 days] →233U).[21] Globally, almost higher than 95% of 225Ac is produced by the generator extraction method from 229Th (Th-GEx method). The process involves dissolving 229Th in 8M nitric acid, followed by the use of anion exchange resins to separate the mixture of 225Ac and 225Ra. Subsequently, individualized 225Ac is acquired through supplementary refinement processes, encompassing potential techniques such as cationic exchange columnar,[22] solid-phase extraction chromatography,[23] or a synergistic application of anionic and cationic exchange resin systems,[22] discrete 225Ac can be obtained. This results in the extraction of immaculate 225Ac around 80%–95% for preclinical and clinical applications. The 299Th generator is capable of producing an annual yield reaching 33.3 GBq,[5] which is equivalent to a daily output of approximately 90.41 MBq. In addition, the production capacity of A research institute is projected to be around 1.85 GBq[24] of 225Ac on a monthly basis, which roughly equates to a daily production of about 61.6 MBq.
Production of actinium-225 through thorium proton spallation
The augmentative potential of 225Ac production can be realized through the employment of cyclotrons for the irradiation of natural 232Th targets with protons exhibiting medium to high energy.[25] The direct production of 225Ac from 232Th targets can be achieved by utilizing high-energy protons ranging from 78 to 192 MeV. This technique has the potential to generate curie quantities of 225Ac.[14] A quantity of 1.54 curies of 225Ac can be synthesized during a 10-day irradiation period involving a 5 gcm − 2 thorium target at BNL-BLIP, utilizing meticulously adjusted beam currents of 100 μA and incident proton energies at 192 MeV. This resultant production equates to an approximate daily output of 4748.3 MBq, with a corresponding 227Ac/225Ac ratio of 0.20%.[26] The Tri-Lab project team is exploring methodologies for the direct extraction of 225Ac from thorium targets that have been irradiated with protons. In an experiment that spanned 10 days, a proton beam with an energy of 200 MeV was irradiated at 165 μA, successfully yielding 81.4 GBq of 225Ac[27] roughly translating to an approximate daily output of 8140 MBq. A method for producing a 225Ac generator from thorium irradiated with protons has been developed at TRIUMF, which minimizes the undesirable 227Ac byproduct to a level of 0.1 − 0.3% relative to the 225Ac activity.[28] Another significant hurdle in this process is the isolation and refinement of 225Ac from the radionuclides that are coproduced.[29] A unique precipitation-based thorium debulking method is introduced for the chemical separation process to isolate 225Ac from most other elements and yield 225Ac with minimal 227Ac content. This procedure entails the precipitation of thorium peroxide, employing cation exchange to diminish the dimensions of chromatographic columns, processing durations, and the magnitude of liquid radioactive waste, along with the utilization of extraction chromatography for the isolation of 225Ac from other elemental constituents. Compared to other thorium precipitates, such as thorium oxalate or thorium iodate, this method offers better filtration performance and less interference.[13]
Actinium-225 production by electron accelerators
In an alternative method for generating 225Ac, a tungsten target is subjected to an incident electron beam, resulting in the production of bremsstrahlung photons. Employing a 20 mg 226Ra initiator positioned at a distance of 12.5 cm from the tungsten substrate, this procedure yields 2.44 MBq of 225Ac. Using this method, it is feasible to obtain a monthly yield of 48 GBq of 225Ac from a 1g 226Ra initiator.[30] This method necessitates a potent linear accelerator (LINAC) featuring an extended pulse duration, optimal current intensity, and practical high-frequency generation for efficient production. In addition, implementing this technique can contribute to the diminution of 226Ra nuclear waste.[31] Niowave’s superconducting linear accelerators demonstrate the capability to handle a significant annual production exceeding 500 curies of 225Ac, employing a 20 MeV, 210 kW beam, equivalent to approximately 50,684.9 MBq per day.[32] Hitachi reported that this effective technique yielded a substantial quantity of 63000 MBq of 225Ac, derived from a 226Ra target, utilizing electron linear accelerators operating at energy levels ranging from 27-44 MeV and irradiated by electron currents ranging from 61 to 160 μA for 24 h.[33] An alternative method for producing 225Ac involves utilizing a photonuclear reaction 226Ra(γ, n) 225Ra (β, 14.8 days) → 225Ac using either a microtron[34] or a linear electron accelerator.[30,31] When subjecting 226Ra to radiation, it undergoes a transformation into 225Ra by (γ, n) reaction, which requires a certain period of time after irradiation to naturally decay into 225Ac. This duration is known as the cooling time and is necessary for 225Ra to reach its peak activity before it can be utilized effectively.[35] One notable drawback of the procedure for producing 225Ac through photonuclear reactions is the utilization of highly radioactive and emanating targets, as well as the need for powerful electron accelerators. However, a significant advantage of its photonuclear production is the potential to make use of old radioactive waste that contains Ra. This means that existing radioactive waste, which may have limited practical applications, can be repurposed to produce valuable 225Ac through the photonuclear method.[36]
Actinium-225 production by proton accelerators
Several approaches have been developed to produce 225Ac using accelerators. Among these methods, the most favorable one for generating 225Ac on a large scale is the utilization of a cyclotron to irradiate a 226Ra target with protons, leading to the transformation of 226Ra into 225Ac through the process of 226Ra (p, 2n) 225Ac.[26] This method is used to generate 225Ac by providing photon energy of 16.8 MeV in a medical cyclotron, which is demonstrated experimentally for the first time.[15] The benefit of utilizing this reaction is that it does not coproduce any other long-lived actinium radioisotope, such as 227Ac, thereby ensuring the purity of the 225Ac produced.[19] This method is considered the most viable approach due to the utilization of low proton energy. The Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU) managed to produce approximately 485 MBq of 225Ac by subjecting a RaCl2 target to a 28 MeV beam for 45.3 h at a beam current of 50 μA, resulting in an estimated daily output of 4748.3 MBq of 225Ac.[27] Many cyclotrons are already being used worldwide where more than 550 cyclotrons have energy over 16MeV. Due to fulfilling the clinical needs of 225Ac in treatment, proton accelerators can provide a large number of productions of 225Ac. Theoretically, a single-energy beam of 20 MeV on 1g 226Ra can generate 4 TBq of 225Ac per month.[37]
Actinium-225 production in nuclear reactors and challenges of 226Ra irradiation
Nuclear reactors are the most popular source for medical isotopes. However, the production of 225Ac through reactors is still limited. 225Ra can be generated by 226Ra (n, 2n) 225Ra reaction and intense root of high (>6.4 MeV) neutrons that will be controlled by an extremely toxic actinium 227Ac (t1/2 ~ 21.8 y) isotope. This method is still not observed experimentally.[13] Although a sufficient amount of 225Ac could be possible to generate. Still, there are some challenges like safely handling the vast resource of 226Ra and production cost. In the 1920s, the extensive production of 226Ra, the only stable isotope closely related to 225Ac with a prolonged half-life, made it the primary radioactive material for meeting both medical and commercial needs. This is due to its suitability as a target material for the production of 225Ac, driven by the demand in the medical and commercial sectors. However, due to the severe radiotoxicity of the substance, its reactivity with liquids and gases, and its degradation into 222Rn gas, the production of the substance was discontinued in 1960.[38] The new source of extracting 226 Ra from uranium ore contains 257 mg of 226 Ra for each ton of U3O8,[39] which is almost 12.85 kg of 226Ra per year. However, the required infrastructure for this production is difficult and expensive.
RADIOCHEMISTRY
A radiopharmaceutical contains radioisotope discharge alpha, beta, or gamma particles for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. It is mandatory to study the physical and chemical properties of a radioisotope before clinical and preclinical assay. Most of the radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine are now based on radiometal that has four parts: a linker, a targeted biomolecule (proteins and lipids), a bifunctional chelating agent (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA] and n-hydroxyethyl ethylenediaminetriacetic acid), and the radionuclide (225Ac, 213Bi, 111In, and 117Lu).[40] All actinium found in an aqueous solution with oxidation number (III) are not stable and very much limited which demands a stable chelating agent between the radionuclide and carrier molecule. Furthermore, intravenously injected 225Ac’s high toxicity can be lessened by chelating. Mostly used bifunctional chelators are DTPA (Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, N3O5), DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid, N4O4), EDTA, PEPA (1,4,7,10,13 pentaazacyclopentadecane-N, N’, N”, N”’, N”“-pentaacetic acid, N5O5), CHX-A”-DTPA (cyclohexyl-diethylenetriaminepen- taacetic acid, N3O5), and HEHA, where few of them are in clinical trials. Among them, HEHA is the most favorable, which is a macrocycle compound with a maximum coordination number of 12, comprising 6 nitrogens and 6 carboxylates. Radiometals possessing an ionic radius exceeding 0.9 Å showed constant stability to HEHA, while the Ac3 + ionic radius is 1.12 Å which showed a fruitful result.[13] Another macrocyclic amide DOTA that has an intense affinity to trivalent ions is conjugated with 225Ac through the carboxyl group. 225Ac-DOTA expresses steadiness in preclinical studies which further led to study about effective DOTA derivatives like MeO-DOTA-NCS, creating the path to link with biomolecules through amino acid residues of antibodies.[41]
CLINICAL PERUSAL
The recent clinical state of 225Ac is given in Table 1. A clinical trial of a new treatment for neuroendocrine tumors using a small molecule with 225Ac attached to it, called 225Ac-DOTATOC, began in 2011 by a joint team from JRC Karlsruhe and University Hospital Heidelberg.[40] The investigation determined that the maximum dose that could be tolerated in a single administration was 40 MBq. Treatment was started with 39 patients where an initial dose of 18.5 MBq and a cumulative dose of 75 MBq were provided in a 2-month interval. Patients’ responses were obtained.
Table 1.
Recent clinical state of 225Ac
| Cancer type | Radio conjugate | Patients | Reference/government identifier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leukemia | 225Ac-anti-CD33-mAb | 76 | [44] |
| Glioma | 225Ac-substance P | 20 | [44] |
| Neuroendocrine tumors | 225Ac-DOTATOC | 39 | [44] |
| Prostate cancer | 225Ac-PSMA617 | 400 | [44] |
| mCRPC | 225Ac PSMA | 20 | NCT04225910 |
| AMI | 225Ac-HuM195 | 72 | NCT02575963 |
AML: Acute myeloid leukemia, mCRPC: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
For prostate cancer, treatment development of 225Ac-PSMA617 is considered a milestone in TAT. A clinical test of 225Ac-PSMA617 was started primarily by JRC Karlsruhe and University Hospital Heidelberg and they extended to Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, and Technical University, Munich, in 2013/2014. The presence of a substantial amount of PSMA617 enables the capture of decay daughters from 225Ac, leading to targeted cell death while mitigating the toxic effects of the daughter nuclides. 225Ac-PSMA617 was used in the clinical trial under some protocol based on dosimetry estimate, effective tolerability of salvage. A group of 14 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage prostate cancer underwent a treatment regimen involving the administration of 100 kBq/kg of 225Ac-PSMA617 per treatment cycle, which was repeated twice with an interval of 8 weeks between cycles. Due to xerostomia (dry mouth syndrome), 10% of patients’ treatments have to be discontinued. During the initial cycle of the subsequent investigation, a standardized dose of 8 MBq, equivalent to 100 kBq/kg based on the body weight of an average patient weighing 80 kg, was administered for further evaluation.[42] To minimize damage to the salivary glands, the subsequent cycles of administration were adjusted based on patient response, with reduced doses ranging from 7 to 4 MBq. The dosage de-escalation was implemented to mitigate potential harm while considering individual patient reactions.[43] Figure 3 shows such a case where 225Ac PSMA-617 appears to be effective against prostate cancer however this trial was stopped due to complexities developed in the patient.
Figure 3.
A 79-year-old metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient (patient 11) with lymphatic and bone metastases. The patient received two cycles of 177Lu-PSMA RLT (cumulative activity, 10.5 GBq) after the failure of docetaxel and showed an initial response. However, disease progression was observed in January 2019 after two additional 177Lu-PSMA RLT cycles (cumulative activity, 12 GBq), and the patient was admitted for actinium-225-PSMA-I and T TAT. PSA follow-up and PSMA PET showed impressive response after two cycles (cumulative activity, 13.4 MBq). Unfortunately, the patient developed grade 3 leukocytopenia, and TAT could not be continued. Disease progression was observed in November 2019 after best supportive care (BSC)[49]
Humanized monoclonal antibody HuM195 (anti-CD33)
The effectiveness of this antibody has been scrutinized in clinical examinations, and deployed concomitantly with chemotherapeutic interventions, directed toward the cellular membrane antigen CD33 correlated with myelomonocytic differentiation. From November 1999 to April 2001, among 191 patients, almost 69 patients were treated with MEC (Mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2, Etoposide 80 mg/m2, and Cytarabine 1g/m2) (P = 0.28). Survivals were 156 days, including a few antibody reactions like toxicities, fever, chills, and hypotension. Patients with AML who did not respond to or came back after treatment had a poor chance of survival with humanized anti-CD33 therapy.[45] A new study tested 225Ac-lintuzumab, a different kind of Anti-CD33 drug, on 15 people with AML (aged 45-80 years) who had failed or relapsed after previous treatments. Dose level 18.5, 37, 74, 111, or 148 Kbq/kg total (851-14430 KBq) of 225Ac-lintuzumab was received by the oblations without any severe toxicity except myelosuppression and DLT in three patients which lasted for 35 days and died because of sepsis. In a span of four weeks, a decrease in bone marrow blasts was observed in 8 to 12 patients.[46]
Actinium-225-lintuzumab with low-dose cytarabine phases 2 trails
Eighteen patients of age 60 years or older who are not able to endure intensive chemotherapy were treated by 225Ac-lintuzumab together with low-dose cytarabine. 18.5, 37, and 55.5 KBq/kg/fraction with 20 mg BID (twice a day) doses received by patients within phase 1 and 2 trials. Toxicity febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia were seen. In 75% of patients, 68% of them had a reduction in bone marrow blast after one cycle.[47]
Actinium-225-PSMA-617
PSMA (prostatic-specific membrane antigen) constitutes a glycosylated protein situated at the cellular lipid bilayer, and its radioconjugate 225Ac-PSMA-617 is developed using a PSMA inhibitor sequence called glutamate-urea-lysine. This sequence is utilized for renal clearance, and DOTA is employed as a chelating agent in the radioconjugate.[48] 17 patients were medicated by 225Ac-PSMA-617 at Steve Biko Academic Hospital in Pretoria. The treatment has shown a substantial level of effectiveness in therapy, and its tolerability has been enhanced through the reduction of the dosage amount. In 70% of patients, the decrease of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 50% and a total of 83% of patients showed PSA decline.[43]
ONGOING CLINICAL TRAILS
225Ac is known for its ability to deliver highly localized radiation to cancer cells, thereby minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. The trials listed in table-2 span different medical settings and aim to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and potential applications of 225Ac in treating various types of cancer and other diseases.
Table 2.
Ongoing trials
| Drugs | Disease | Phase | Start date | End date | Participants | Study sponsor | Government identifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JNJ-69086420 | Adenocarcinoma and prostatic neoplasms | 1 | November 12, 2020 | Estimated primary completion: 2025-03-19 Estimated final completion: 2025-07-16 | 76 | Janssen Research and Development, LLC | NCT04644770 |
| 225Ac-J591 | Prostate cancer | 1 | October 10, 2017 | Primary - January 7, 2021 Final - July 2024 | 32 | Weill Medical College of Cornell University | NCT03276572 |
| 225Ac-PSMA617 68Ga-PSMA-11 | Prostatic neoplasms, castration-resistant | 1 | April 1, 2021 | November 12, 2025 | 60 | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | NCT04597411 |
| 225Ac-J591 Pembrolizumab | Prostate cancer | 1 and 2 | August 12, 2021 | Primary completion: June 2025 Final completion: June 2028 | 76 | Weill Medical College of Cornell University | NCT04946370 |
| [111ln]-FPI-1547 [225Ac]-FPI-1434 (multidose) Biological: FPI-1175 Infusion | Advance solid tumors | 1 and 2 | January 17, 2019 | Estimated primary completion: June 2024 Final completion: June 2026 | 253 | Fusion Pharmaceuticals Inc | NCT03746431 |
| 225Ac-J591 | Prostate cancer | 1 | August 18, 2020 | Estimated primary completion: June 30, 2025 Final completion: June 30, 2027 | 105 | Weill Medical College of Cornell University | NCT04506567 |
| 225Ac-J591 with 177Lu-PSMA-I and T 68Ga-PSMA-11 | Prostate cancer | 1 and 2 | June 30, 2021 | Primary completion: December 24, 2024 Final completion: December 27, 2027 | 48 | Weill Medical College of Cornell University | NCT04886986 |
| 225Ac-FPI-2059, 111In-FPI-2058 | NTSR1-expressing solid tumors | 1 | February 7, 2023 | Estimated primary completion: June 2025 Final: September 2025 | 42 | Fusion Pharmaceuticals Inc | NCT05605522 |
| 225Ac-FPI-2265 (PSMA-I and T) | mCRPC | 2 | December 16, 2021 | Estimated primary completion: December 16, 2023 Final: December 16, 2024 | 100 | Excel Diagnostics and Nuclear Oncology Centre | NCT05219500 |
| RYZ101, Everolimus 10 mg, Sunitinib 37.5 mg | GEP-NET | 3 | March 3, 2022 | Estimated primary completion: July 2027 Final: July 2028 | 288 | RayzeBio Inc | NCT05477576 |
| RYZ101 with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab | ES-SCLC | 1 | October 10, 2022 | Estimated primary completion: April 2024 Final: December 2026 | 31 | RayzeBio Inc | NCT05595460 |
| 225Ac-lintuzumab + cladribine, cytarabine, filgrastim, and mitoxantrone | Acute myeloid leukemia | 1 | May 22, 2018 | October 2024 | 26 | Medical College of Wisconsin | NCT03441048 |
| 225Ac-lintuzumab with venetoclax | Acute myeloid leukemia, relapsed adult AML | 1 and 2 | January 15, 2020 | Primary completion: November 2023 Final: June 2024 | 38 | Actinium Pharmaceuticals | NCT03867682 |
GEP-NET: Gastropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, ES-SCLC: Extensive stage small lung cancer, AML: Acute myeloid leukemia, mCRPC: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, NTSR1: Neurotensin receptor 1
PRECLINICAL PERUSAL
α particles have great potentiality as well as toxicity more than other particles. Consequently, preclinical trials are warranted to investigate the efficacy and to lead to future clinical prospects. A vast amount of preclinical trials have been done till now, and many of them are under observation. A few of them are enlisted [Table 3].
Table 3.
Preclinical trials of 225Ac
| Bi-complex | Molecular target | Analysis in | Disease | Dose escalation | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [225Ac] Ac-DOTA-TDA-Lipiodol | HCT116 | Female and male NCG mice | Hepatic tumors | 37 kBq | Significant improvement was observed | [50] |
| [225Ac] Ac-SibuDAB | PSMA-positive PC-3 PIP and PSMA-negative PC-3 flu | Female FVB mice | Prostate cancer | 30 kBq | Increase the risk of radionephrotoxicity | [51] |
| 225Ac-PSMA-617 | RM1-PGLS cells | Mice | Prostate cancer | 30 kBq | Reduces tumor burden and improves TTP and survival | [52] |
| PSMA-positive PC-3 PIP and PSMA-negative PC-3 flu | Female FVB mice | Prostate cancer | 30 kBq | Increase the risk of radionephrotoxicity | [53] | |
| RM1-PSMA+++ | NSG mice | Prostate cancer | 40 kBq | Enhanced radiation-induced cytotoxicity | [54] | |
| C4-2, C4-2B, or 22Rv1 | NSG mice | Liver, lungs, spleen, stomach, and bone metastases | 40 kBq | Antitumor activity | [55] | |
| C4-2 cell | NSG mice | Prostate cancer | 20, 40, and 100 kBq/mouse | Significant tumor growth retardation and improved survival | [56] | |
| 225Ac-NZ-16 | NCL-H226 cell line | In vitro | Mesothelioma | 11.1 kBq, 18.5 kBq | Demonstrated a strong antitumor impact with minimal noticeable side effects | [57] |
| 225Ac-DOTA-SCN-antibody, 225Ac-DOTA | C4-2B, LNCaP, and PC3-PIP, PC3 | Male NSG mice | Prostate cancer | 4.63 kBq | Tumor was removed | [58] |
| 225Ac-crown-aMSH | B16F10 | In vivo (mice) | Melanoma tumors | 4.1±1.9 MBq/nmol | Displays exceptional ratios between target tissue and normal tissue | [59] |
| 225Ac-RPS-074 | LNCaP cells | In vitro, in vivo (male mice) | Prostate cancer | 148 kBq | Treatment was more effective and less harmful and almost 86% of tumor was reduced | [59] |
| 225Ac-Au@TADOTAGA | U-87 MG | Female SCID mice | Glioblastoma | 1 kBq | Retardation of tumor growth | [60] |
| [225Ac] [Ac (H4py4pa)] | HER-2 Cell line-SKOV-3 | Female NRG mice | Ovarian cancer | 10.1±0.7 kBq | Showed good response in vitro serum stability and tumor specificity | [61] |
| [225Ac]-PRIT 225Ac-DOTA-PEG7-Tz | Carbohydrate antigen 19.9 Cell line BxPC3 | Athymic nude mice (in biodistribution, ex vivo, vivo, dosimetry) | PDAC | 18.5 kBq In vivo (9.25, 18.5, or 37 kBq) | Showed higher accumulation on different organs. No significant tumor reduction was noticed | [62] |
| [225Ac] hu11B6 | Kallikrein peptidase 2(hK2) Cell line MFM-223 and BT-474 | Female athymic BALB/c nude mice | Breast cancer | A single dose of 11.1 kBq on 5 mg antibody) | No significant accumulation in any organ. Increased survival | [63] |
| [225Ac]-cixutumumab | IGF-1 | Mice | Breast cancer SUM149T | 0.15 kBq/mg, 8.325, 0.05 kBq, mg/kg and (8 kBq/mg, 8.325 kBq, 2.5 mg/kg) | Extended survival, with a median duration of 122 days, and 2/6 mice had complete tumor mitigation | [64] |
| [225Ac] Ac-DOTA-anti-VLA-4 | a4b1 integrin Cell line B16F10 | C57BL/6 male mice Age range (6–8) weeks | Melanoma | In biodistribution (14.8 kBq, 20 mg) | Increased survival with median survival rises 6–8 days. Dose limited hematopoietic toxicity was observed | [65] |
| [225Ac]-DOTA-MMA | DLL3 | NOD SCID female mice. Age range (5–7) weeks | SCLC | 296 kBq/kg MTD: 18.8–55.5 kBq | Showed tumor control. In a biodistribution study, this radiolabeled conjugate induced toxicity | [66] |
| [225Ac] DOTA-Bn | GPA33 antigen | Female athymic nude mice | Colorectal, breast, and neuroblastoma | 3.7 MBq | Showed different antitumor efficacy | [67] |
| 225Ac-proteus-DOTA | GPA33 antigen | In vitro, vivo, biodistribution, therapy | Colorectal, breast, and neuroblastoma | Up to 296 kBq/mouse | Increased overall survival | [68] |
| [225Ac]-FAPI-04 | FAP PANC-1 and MIA PaCa-2 cell line | Male nude mice | Pancreatic cancer | 10 kBq, 34 kBq/100 mL | Liver, kidney, and tumor showed high uptake, reduced tumor growth | [69] |
DLL3: Delta-like 3 protein, IGF-1: Insulin growth factor receptor 1, PDAC: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, SCLC: Small cell lung cancer, NOD: Nonobese diabetic, SCID: Severe combined immunodeficiency, PSMA: Prostatic-specific membrane antigen, TTP: Time To Progression, PGLS: 6-phosphogluconolactonase, LNCaP: Lymph Node Carcinoma of the Prostate, U-87 MG: Uppsala 87 Malignant Glioma, HER2: Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2, BALB: Bagg Albino, MTD: Maximum Tolerated Dose, PANC-1: Human Pancreatic cancer cell line, FAP: Fibroblast Activation Protein, PaCa-2: Pancreatic Carcinoma-2, PC-3 PIP: Prostate Cancer cell line- Performance Improvement Plan, FVB: Friend leukemia virus B
DISCUSSION
Normal vasculature is known as the circulatory system of a human body, where arterioles, veins, and capillaries are distributed at a successively equal distance, while a growing tumor or tumor vasculature can be defined as an unevenly gaped and disorganized system. A solid tumor consists of tumor cells, including immune cells, vasculature, and ECM. Several cell surface and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins like collagens, elastin, integrins, and glycoproteins are the main reasons for creating tumor vessels by forming progressive supermolecular platforms that further start to grow as new abnormal blood vessels that interrupt oxygen and drug transportation in the tumor cells. These unusual blood vessel enhancements are the major obstacle to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The highly active and energetic alpha particle-like 225Ac can easily penetrate those immature blood vessels and its suitable geometrical structure terminates tumor neovascular endothelium cells and their originators.[70] The high-linear-energy radiation decayed from alpha particles kills cancer cells while transiting through the blood and lymph systems and also stampedes the network of blood vessels within the tumor by destroying tumor capillary endothelial cells. Cancers like leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma emerged in the blood. The short-range alpha particles showed an effective outcome that was observed in a phase 1 trial. By manipulating the structure and properties of cell membranes, MABs control tumor growth, while radio conjugates of 225Ac target hormone receptors like estrogen (ER) and androgens, which are more effective in therapy.[71] Nude and transgenic mice have a similar immune system to a human where cancer can generate and are widely used for preclinical studies and many of those radioconjugates came to clinical trial successfully.
CONCLUSION
Targeted radiotherapy has taken the attention to a fight against cancer worldwide. In a large amount of clinical and preclinical studies, radiochemistry of α emitters has been demonstrated in recent days. Their unique specifications, stability with a chelator, targeting capability to specific cells, cross dose, and bystander effects gave the ability to capitalize on cancer treatment. The utilization of 225Ac in TAT shows great potential in the development of novel therapeutic radiopharmaceutical drugs. The remarkable effectiveness of 225AcPSMA-617 in treating prostate cancer has generated substantial international attention and has sparked interest in employing 225Ac as a therapeutic isotope for cancer treatment through TAT. As presented above in this review, we tried to delineate the production, clinical and preclinical studies, and currently ongoing clinical investigation of 225Ac radionuclide. Because of its vast amount of preclinical trials and undergoing clinical investigation in which some of them are completed, 225Ac is considered to be a reliable option for cancer treatment, yet production is an obstacle to overcome.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Morgenstern A, Abbas K, Bruchertseifer F, Apostolidis C. Production of alpha emitters for targeted alpha therapy. Curr Radiopharm. 2008;3:135–43. [Google Scholar]
- 2.McDevitt MR, Sgouros G, Finn RD, Humm JL, Jurcic JG, Larson SM, et al. Radioimmunotherapy with alpha-emitting nuclides. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:1341–51. doi: 10.1007/s002590050306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Radchenko V, Mastren T, Meyer CA, Ivanov AS, Bryantsev VS, Copping R, et al. Radiometric evaluation of diglycolamide resins for the chromatographic separation of actinium from fission product lanthanides. Talanta. 2017;175:318–24. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McDevitt MR, Sgouros G, Sofou S. Targeted and nontargeted α-particle therapies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2018;20:73–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Poty S, Francesconi LC, McDevitt MR, Morris MJ, Lewis JS. α-Emitters for radiotherapy: From basic radiochemistry to clinical studies-part 1. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:878–84. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Geerlings MW, Kaspersen FM, Apostolidis C, van der Hout R. The feasibility of 225Ac as a source of alpha-particles in radioimmunotherapy. Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:121–5. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199302000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miederer M, Scheinberg DA, McDevitt MR. Realizing the potential of the actinium-225 radionuclide generator in targeted alpha particle therapy applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1371–82. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McDevitt MR, Ma D, Lai LT, Simon J, Borchardt P, Frank RK, et al. Tumor therapy with targeted atomic nanogenerators. Science. 2001;294:1537–40. doi: 10.1126/science.1064126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Song H, Hobbs RF, Vajravelu R, Huso DL, Esaias C, Apostolidis C, et al. Radioimmunotherapy of breast cancer metastases with alpha-particle emitter 225Ac: Comparing efficacy with 213Bi and 90Y. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8941–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thiele NA, Wilson JJ. Actinium-225 for targeted α therapy: Coordination chemistry and current chelation approaches. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2018;33:336–48. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2018.2494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grimes WR. Chemical Research and Development for Molten-Salt Breeder Reactors. Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States) 1972 [doi:10.2172/4622532] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Norenberg J, Staples P, Atcher R, Tribble R, Faught J, Riedinger L. Workshop on the nation's need for isotopes:present and future. Department of Energy, Rockville, MD, DOE/SC--0107. 2008 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Robertson AK, Ramogida CF, Schaffer P, Radchenko V. Development of (225) Ac radiopharmaceuticals: TRIUMF perspectives and experiences. Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11:156–72. doi: 10.2174/1874471011666180416161908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Griswold JR, Medvedev DG, Engle JW, Copping R, Fitzsimmons JM, Radchenko V, et al. Large scale accelerator production of (225) Ac: Effective cross sections for 78-192MeV protons incident on (232) th targets. Appl Radiat Isot. 2016;118:366–74. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Apostolidis C, Molinet R, McGinley J, Abbas K, Möllenbeck J, Morgenstern A. Cyclotron production of Ac-225 for targeted alpha therapy. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005;62:383–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jalloul W, Ghizdovat V, Stolniceanu CR, Ionescu T, Grierosu IC, Pavaleanu I, et al. Targeted alpha therapy: All we need to know about (225) ac's physical characteristics and production as a potential theranostic radionuclide. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023;16:1679. doi: 10.3390/ph16121679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhuikov BL, Kalmykov SN, Ermolaev SV, Aliev RA, Kokhanyuk VM, Matushko VL, et al. Production of 225Ac and 223Ra by irradiation of th with accelerated protons. Radiochemistry. 2011;53:73–80. [doi:10.1134/S1066362211010103] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Engle JW, Mashnik SG, Weidner JW, Wolfsberg LE, Fassbender ME, Jackman K, et al. Cross sections from proton irradiation of thorium at 800 MeV. Phys Rev. 2013;88:014604. [doi:10.1103/physrevc. 88.014604] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hoehr C, Bénard F, Buckley K, Crawford J, Gottberg A, Hanemaayer V, et al. Medical isotope production at TRIUMF –From imaging to treatment. Phys Procedia. 2017;90:200–8. [doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2017.09.059] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dos Santos Augusto R, Buehler L, Lawson Z, Marzari S, Stachura M, Stora T, et al. CERN-medicis (medical isotopes collected from isolde): A new facility. APSC. 2014;4:265–81. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guseva LI, Dogadkin NN. Development of a tandem generator system 229Th/225Ac/213Bi for repeated production of short-lived α-emitting radionuclides. Radiochemistry. 2009;51:169–74. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boll RA, Malkemus D, Mirzadeh S. Production of actinium-225 for alpha particle mediated radioimmunotherapy. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005;62:667–79. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Apostolidis C, Molinet R, Rasmussen G, Morgenstern A. Production of Ac-225 from Th-229 for targeted alpha therapy. Anal Chem. 2005;77:6288–91. doi: 10.1021/ac0580114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Samsonov MD, Nerozin NA, Podsoblyaev DA, Prokof’ev IV, Tkachev SV, Khamianov SV, et al. Isolation of alpha-emitting radionuclides for nuclear medicine in JSC “SSC RF–IPPE.”. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Targeted Alpha Therapy, Kanazawa, Japan. 2017;30 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rubira L, Deshayes E, Santoro L, Kotzki PO, Fersing C. (225) Ac-labeled somatostatin analogs in the management of neuroendocrine tumors: From radiochemistry to clinic. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1051. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Griswold, Justin Reed. Actinium-225 Production via Proton Irradiation of Thorium-232. PhD diss., University of Tennessee. 2016. [[Last accessed on 2024 Jun 09]]. Available from: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3918 .
- 27.Ju K, Kim Y. Feasibility of a novel photoproduction of 225Ac and 227Th with natural thorium target. Sci Rep. 2022;12:372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04339-9. [doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04339-9] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Robertson AK, Ladouceur K, Nozar M, Moskven L, Ramogida CF, D’Auria J, et al. Design and simulation of a thorium target for 225Ac production. AIP Conf Proc. 2017 [doi:10.1063/1.4983550] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dhiman D, Vatsa R, Sood A. Challenges and opportunities in developing actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl Med Commun. 2022;43:970–7. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Melville G, Meriarty H, Metcalfe P, Knittel T, Allen BJ. Production of Ac-225 for cancer therapy by photon-induced transmutation of Ra-226. Appl Radiat Isot. 2007;65:1014–22. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Melville G, Allen BJ. Cyclotron and linac production of Ac-225. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:549–55. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.NioWave. Alpha Emitters. [[Last accessed on 2024 Jan 19]]. Available from: https://www.niowaveinc.com /index.php/alpha-emitters/
- 33.Mourtada F, Tomiyoshi K, Sims-Mourtada J, Mukai-Sasaki Y, Yagihashi T, Namiki Y, et al. Actinium-225 targeted agents: Where are we now? Brachytherapy. 2023;22:697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Maslov OD, Sabel’nikov AV, Dmitriev SN. Preparation of 225Ac by 226RA(γ, n) photonuclear reaction on an electron accelerator, MT-25 microtron. Radiochemistry. 2006;48:195–7. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Szabo T, Neto FB, Guillaumon P, De Moraes IS, Oliveira HC. FLUKA Simulations of 225Ac Production Using Electron Accelerators: Validation through Comparison with Published Experiments. 12th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC'21), Campinas, SP, Brazil. 2021:24–8. 1226-8. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kazakov AG, Ekatova TY, Babenya JS. Photonuclear production of medical radiometals: A review of experimental studies. J Radioanal Nucl Ch. 2021;328:493–505. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schaffer P, Bénard F, Bernstein A, Buckley K, Celler A, Cockburn N, et al. Direct production of 99mTc via 100Mo (p, 2n) on small medical cyclotrons. Phys Procedia. 2015;66:383–95. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pettersson BG. Nature and Magnitude of the Problem of Spent Radiation Sources., Vienna: IAEA TECDOC-620. 1991 [Google Scholar]
- 39.VanSant PD. Medical Isotope Production of Actinium-225 by Linear Accelerator Photon Irradiation of Radium-226. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sarko D, Eisenhut M, Haberkorn U, Mier W. Bifunctional chelators in the design and application of radiopharmaceuticals for oncological diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:2667–88. doi: 10.2174/092986712800609751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McDevitt MR, Ma D, Simon J, Frank RK, Scheinberg DA. Design and synthesis of 225Ac radioimmunopharmaceuticals. Appl Radiat Isot. 2002;57:841–7. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(02)00167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Bronzel M, Apostolidis C, Weichert W, et al. Targeted α-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with (225) Ac-PSMA-617: Dosimetry estimate and empiric dose finding. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1624–31. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Knoesen O, Reyneke F, Lawal I, Lengana T, et al. (225) Ac-PSMA-617 in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced prostate cancer: A pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:129–38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4167-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Bruchertseifer F. Supply and clinical application of actinium-225 and bismuth-213. Semin Nucl Med. 2020;50:119–23. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feldman EJ, Brandwein J, Stone R, Kalaycio M, Moore J, O’Connor J, et al. Phase III randomized multicenter study of a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, lintuzumab, in combination with chemotherapy, versus chemotherapy alone in patients with refractory or first-relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4110–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jurcic JG, Rosenblat TL, McDevitt MR, Pandit-Taskar N, Carrasquillo JA, Chanel S, et al. Phase I trial of the targeted alpha-particle nano-generator actinium-225 (225Ac)-lintuzumab (anti-CD33;HUM195) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Blood. 2011;118:768. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Atallah E, Orozco JJ, Craig M, Levy M, Finn L, Khan SS, et al. Aphase 2 study of actinium-225 (225Ac)-lintuzumab in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) –Interim analysis of 1.5 μci/Kg/Dose. Blood. 2018;1457;132(Suppl 1) [Google Scholar]
- 48.Benešová M, Bauder-Wüst U, Schäfer M, Klika KD, Mier W, Haberkorn U, et al. Linker modification strategies to control the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting and pharmacokinetic properties of DOTA-conjugated PSMA inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2016;59:1761–75. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zacherl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Mittlmeier L, Böning G, Gosewisch A, Wenter V, et al. First clinical results for PSMA-targeted α-therapy using (225) Ac-PSMA-I and T in advanced-mCRPC patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:669–74. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Josefsson A, Cortez AG, Rajkumar H, Latoche JD, Jaswal AP, Day KE, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and therapeutic efficacy for the α-particle-emitting transarterial radioembolization (αTARE) agent [(225) Ac] Ac-DOTA-TDA-Lipiodol(®) against hepatic tumors. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2023;8:19. doi: 10.1186/s41181-023-00205-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Busslinger SD, Tschan VJ, Richard OK, Talip Z, Schibli R, Müller C. (225) AcAc-SibuDAB for targeted alpha therapy of prostate cancer: Preclinical evaluation and comparison with [(225) Ac] Ac-PSMA-617. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:5651. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Czernin J, Current K, Mona CE, Nyiranshuti L, Hikmat F, Radu CG, et al. Immune-checkpoint blockade enhances (225) Ac-PSMA617 efficacy in a mouse model of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:228–31. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Current K, Meyer C, Magyar CE, Mona CE, Almajano J, Slavik R, et al. Investigating PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy efficacy as a function of cellular PSMA levels and intratumoral PSMA heterogeneity. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:2946–55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Stuparu AD, Meyer CA, Evans-Axelsson SL, Lückerath K, Wei LH, Kim W, et al. Targeted alpha therapy in a systemic mouse model of prostate cancer –A feasibility study. Theranostics. 2020;10:2612–20. doi: 10.7150/thno.42228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Meyer C, Stuparu AD, Liu W, Capri J, Le T, Radu CG, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and dosimetry of targeted alpha therapy using 225Ac-PSMA-617 in a murine model of prostate cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat. 2019;50:S24. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sudo H, Tsuji AB, Sugyo A, Kaneko MK, Kato Y, Nagatsu K, et al. Preclinical evaluation of podoplanin-targeted alpha-radioimmunotherapy with the novel antibody NZ-16 for malignant mesothelioma. Cells. 2021;10:2503. doi: 10.3390/cells10102503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Salerno D, Howe A, Bhatavdekar O, Josefsson A, Pacheco-Torres J, Bhujwalla ZM, et al. Two diverse carriers are better than one: A case study in α-particle therapy for prostate specific membrane antigen-expressing prostate cancers. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022;7:e10266. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yang H, Zhang C, Yuan Z, Rodriguez-Rodriguez C, Robertson A, Radchenko V, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of a macrocyclic actinium-225 chelator, quality control and in vivo evaluation of (225) Ac-crown-αMSH peptide. Chemistry. 2020;26:11435–40. doi: 10.1002/chem.202002999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kelly JM, Amor-Coarasa A, Ponnala S, Nikolopoulou A, Williams C, Jr, Thiele NA, et al. Asingle dose of (225) Ac-RPS-074 induces a complete tumor response in an LNCaP xenograft model. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:649–55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.219592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Salvanou EA, Stellas D, Tsoukalas C, Mavroidi B, Paravatou-Petsotas M, Kalogeropoulos N, et al. Aproof-of-concept study on the therapeutic potential of au nanoparticles radiolabeled with the alpha-emitter actinium-225. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:188. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li L, Rousseau J, Jaraquemada-Peláez MG, Wang X, Robertson A, Radchenko V, et al. (225) Ac-H (4) py4pa for targeted alpha therapy. Bioconjug Chem. 2021;32:1348–63. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Poty S, Carter LM, Mandleywala K, Membreno R, Abdel-Atti D, Ragupathi A, et al. Leveraging bioorthogonal click chemistry to improve (225) Ac-radioimmunotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:868–80. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Thorek DL, Ku AT, Mitsiades N, Veach D, Watson PA, Metha D, et al. Harnessing androgen receptor pathway activation for targeted alpha particle radioimmunotherapy of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:881–91. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Solomon VR, Alizadeh E, Bernhard W, Hartimath SV, Hill W, Chekol R, et al. (111) In- and (225) Ac-labeled cixutumumab for imaging and α-particle radiotherapy of IGF-1R positive triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Pharm. 2019;16:4807–16. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cortez A, Josefsson A, McCarty G, Shtekler AE, Rao A, Austin Z, et al. Evaluation of [(225) Ac] Ac-DOTA-anti-VLA-4 for targeted alpha therapy of metastatic melanoma. Nucl Med Biol. 2020;88-9:62–72. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lakes AL, An DD, Gauny SS, Ansoborlo C, Liang BH, Rees JA, et al. Evaluating (225) Ac and (177) Lu radioimmunoconjugates against antibody-drug conjugates for small-cell lung cancer. Mol Pharm. 2020;17:4270–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cheal SM, McDevitt MR, Santich BH, Patel M, Yang G, Fung EK, et al. Alpha radioimmunotherapy using (225) Ac-proteus-DOTA for solid tumors –Safety at curative doses. Theranostics. 2020;10:11359–75. doi: 10.7150/thno.48810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Watabe T, Liu Y, Kaneda-Nakashima K, Shirakami Y, Lindner T, Ooe K, et al. Theranostics targeting fibroblast activation protein in the tumor stroma:(64) Cu- and (225) Ac-labeled FAPI-04 in pancreatic cancer xenograft mouse models. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:563–9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Qin Y, Imobersteg S, Blanc A, Frank S, Schibli R, Béhé MP, et al. Evaluation of actinium-225 labeled minigastrin analogue [(225) Ac] Ac-DOTA-PP-F11N for targeted alpha particle therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:1088. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Singh Jaggi J, Henke E, Seshan SV, Kappel BJ, Chattopadhyay D, May C, et al. Selective alpha-particle mediated depletion of tumor vasculature with vascular normalization. PLoS One. 2007;2:e267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Allen BJ, Huang CY, Clarke RA. Targeted alpha anticancer therapies: Update and future prospects. Biologics. 2014;8:255–67. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S29947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



