Table 2.
Major characteristics of the include study.
| Study ID | Study type | Location | Participants Characteristics | BNP measurement method | References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (%) | Female (%) | Age | Case | Control | |||||
| Funayama 2011 | Case-Control | Japan | 62.2 | 37.8 | 68.5 ± 10.5 | HF | Healthy | NR | [8] |
| Girerd 2022 | Rct | USA | 76 | 24 | 67.55 ± 9.95 | HF | HF re-hospitalization with lower symptoms | NR | [9] |
| Chetran 2022 | Case-Control | Romania | 63.8 | 36.3 | 65.18 ± 12.98 | AHF | ambulatory without HF | CL-EIA | [14] |
| Johansson 2022 | Case-Control | Sweden | 36.3 | 63.7 | 78.3 ± 5.1 | HFpEF | Healthy | NR | [10] |
| Kang 2017 | Case-Control | China | 35.4 | 64.6 | 64.05 ± 10.35 | SHF | No SHF | ECLIA | [15] |
| Kanukurti 2020 | Cross-Sectional Study | India | 52 | 47 | 57 ± 0.165 | HFpEF | Healthy | ECLIA | [16] |
| Sultana 2010 | Case-Control | Bangladesh | 56 | 44 | 39 ± 30 | HF | Healthy | MEIA | [11] |
| Sutter 2015 | Cohort Case-Control | Belgium | 100 | 0 | 50 ± 3 | HF/CHD | Free from coronary event | ECLA | [12] |
| Yu 2017 | Case-Control | China | 61.7 | 38.3 | 63.65 ± 7.85 | CHF | Healthy | ELISA | [13] |
CHD = coronary heart disease, CHF = coronary heart failure, CL-EIA = chemiluminiscence enzyme immune assay, ECLA = electrochemiluminiscence assay, ECLIA = electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection factor, MEIA = microparticle enzyme immunoassay, NR = not reported, SHF = systolic heart failure.