Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 23;103(8):e36933. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036933

Table 2.

Major characteristics of the include study.

Study ID Study type Location Participants Characteristics BNP measurement method References
Male (%) Female (%) Age Case Control
Funayama 2011 Case-Control Japan 62.2 37.8 68.5 ± 10.5 HF Healthy NR [8]
Girerd 2022 Rct USA 76 24 67.55 ± 9.95 HF HF re-hospitalization with lower symptoms NR [9]
Chetran 2022 Case-Control Romania 63.8 36.3 65.18 ± 12.98 AHF ambulatory without HF CL-EIA [14]
Johansson 2022 Case-Control Sweden 36.3 63.7 78.3 ± 5.1 HFpEF Healthy NR [10]
Kang 2017 Case-Control China 35.4 64.6 64.05 ± 10.35 SHF No SHF ECLIA [15]
Kanukurti 2020 Cross-Sectional Study India 52 47 57 ± 0.165 HFpEF Healthy ECLIA [16]
Sultana 2010 Case-Control Bangladesh 56 44 39 ± 30 HF Healthy MEIA [11]
Sutter 2015 Cohort Case-Control Belgium 100 0 50 ± 3 HF/CHD Free from coronary event ECLA [12]
Yu 2017 Case-Control China 61.7 38.3 63.65 ± 7.85 CHF Healthy ELISA [13]

CHD = coronary heart disease, CHF = coronary heart failure, CL-EIA = chemiluminiscence enzyme immune assay, ECLA = electrochemiluminiscence assay, ECLIA = electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection factor, MEIA = microparticle enzyme immunoassay, NR = not reported, SHF = systolic heart failure.