Table 2.
In silico docking analysis of binding affinity and pose fitness between novel annulated Benzo[h]chromenes and C. pipiens neural targets (AChE, nAChRs, and VGSC α subunit).
| Compd | AChE | nAChRs | VGSC α subunit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *S | **RMSD Refine | S | RMSD Refine | S | RMSD Refine | |
| 1a | − 6.73 | 1.85 | − 5.55 | 1.61 | − 5.99 | 0.98 |
| 1b | − 6.63 | 1.11 | − 5.65 | 0.83 | − 5.30 | 1.34 |
| 3 | − 6.86 | 1.94 | − 5.99 | 1.14 | − 6.04 | 1.69 |
| 5a | − 6.64 | 1.76 | − 5.91 | 1.51 | − 5.83 | 1.90 |
| 5b | − 7.15 | 1.08 | − 6.19 | 1.56 | − 5.66 | 0.85 |
| 6 | − 8.11 | 1.31 | − 6.27 | 1.20 | − 6.42 | 1.81 |
| 7 | − 7.40 | 1.01 | − 6.67 | 1.35 | − 6.18 | 1.73 |
| 8 | − 6.61 | 1.41 | − 5.48 | 1.19 | − 5.49 | 1.32 |
| 9 | − 7.25 | 1.32 | − 6.44 | 1.06 | − 6.09 | 1.14 |
| 10 | − 8.33 | 1.61 | − 6.74 | 1.34 | − 6.28 | 1.62 |
| 11b | − 8.01 | 1.89 | − 7.10 | 1.52 | − 6.74 | 1.90 |
| 12 | − 7.90 | 1.12 | − 5.88 | 1.39 | − 6.24 | 1.55 |
| 13 | − 7.88 | 1.66 | − 6.04 | 0.72 | − 6.20 | 1.64 |
| 14 | − 7.60 | 1.80 | − 6.40 | 1.72 | − 6.74 | 0.77 |
| 16 | − 8.28 | 1.50 | − 6.79 | 1.64 | − 6.56 | 1.00 |
| Reference insecticide | Chlorpyrifos | Nitenpyram | Indoxacarb | |||
| − 6.89 | 1.27 | − 6.04 | 1.78 | − 6.61 | 1.55 | |
*S: Docking Score, kcal/mol.
**RMSD: Root mean square deviation, Å.