A comparison of photocatalytic activity related to WO3 immobilized on diatomite substrate and photocatalyst degradation tetracycline.
| Catalyst | Organic contaminant (ppm) | Light source | Catalyst dosage (g L−1) | Time (h) | Degradation efficiency (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2/WO3/diatomite (T25-W5/Di) | Paraquat/12.6 | Solar (400 W) | 1.4 | 3.0 | 80 | 24 |
| WO3/Fe3O4/diatomite (WO3/Fe3O4/DT) | Rhodamine B/5 | Xenon (500 W) | 0.3 | 0.6 | 78 | 42 |
| Methyl orange/5 | 95 | |||||
| Methylene blue/5 | 83 | |||||
| PVDF-TiO2@g-C3N4 | Tetracycline/50 | Vis (300 W) | 1.0 | 5 | 97 | 43 |
| Bi2WO6/g-C3N4 | Tetracycline/10 | Sunlight (35 W) | 1.0 | 1.5 | 95 | 44 |
| Ag/Bi2Sn2O7–C3N4 | Tetracycline/20 | UV (400 W) | 1.0 | 1.5 | 89 | 45 |
| 10% WO3/diatomite + 3 mM PMS | Tetracycline/40 | Vis (300 W) | 0.2 | 3.0 | 80 | This work |