Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Aug 9;19(8):e0308813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308813

Multiple risk factors are associated with an incremental increase in acute venous thromboembolism risk after total joint arthroplasty: A pearldiver cohort study

Mandeep Kumar 1,2,*, Regina O Kostyun 2, Matthew J Solomito 2, Mitchell McClure 1
Editor: Eyüp Serhat Çalık3
PMCID: PMC11315297  PMID: 39121075

Abstract

Introduction

Several risk factors are associated with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of literature regarding the cumulative impact of multiple risk factors. To address this gap, we utilized the PearlDiver database, an insurance billing claims database containing de-identified data from 91 million orthopedic patients.

Methods

The PearlDiver database was queried for records of patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty from 2010 to 2019 using ICD-10 and CPT codes. Twelve persistent and two transient risk factors were analyzed for their association with the occurrence of acute VTE within three months after surgery. Univariate and logistic regression analyses with odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted to determine the odds associated with each risk factor and the impact of multiple concurrent risk factors.

Results

A total of 988,675 patients who underwent hip and knee arthroplasty met the inclusion criteria, of whom 1.5% developed acute VTE after three months. The prevalence of VTE risk factors ranged from 0.2 to 38.6%. Individual, persistent risk factors demonstrated 14–84% increased odds of VTE compared to a 1.2% increase for a transient risk factor (acute myocardial infarction). Three or more persistent risk factors were associated with a higher risk of VTE.

Conclusion and relevance

Persistent risk factors were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative VTE than transient risk factors. An incremental increase in risk was noted if three or more persistent risk factors were present.

Introduction

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) promotes functional independence and improves the quality of life in patients with end-stage arthritis. Approximately 1.5 million lower extremity TJA procedures are performed in the United States annually [1]. A concerning postoperative complication is acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), estimated to occur in 0.6% to 3.0% of TJA cases [2]. Acute VTE events contribute to almost 100,000 deaths annually and add nearly $10 billion to healthcare costs [3]. Therefore, identification of at-risk patients is crucial to inform VTE prevention strategies.

The International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis suggests classifying VTE risks as persistent (i.e., age, weight, cancer diagnoses) or transient (e.g., surgical time, immobilization) [4]. Despite multiple studies evaluating VTE risk factors in patients with TJA, several gaps in literature remain. In a recent systematic review [5], older age [610], female sex [6], higher body mass index [9], bilateral procedures [9,11], and surgical times greater than two hours were reported as VTE risk factors. There are inconsistent findings or a lack of data on the role of diabetes mellitus [9,12], malignancy [9,12], VTE history [6,12], varicose veins [13], hypertension[9], and hormone replacement [14] on VTE risk. Some studies suggest that transient events, such as TJA [15,16] and acute myocardial infarction [17], may increase VTE risk for up to 6–12 months postoperatively. Several studies have examined these risk factors in isolation rather than the cumulative impact when more than one risk factor is present [8,18].

The primary goal of our study was to utilize the PearlDiver database to investigate the association between the cumulative effect of two or more VTE risk factors compared with TJA as an independent risk factor. National healthcare claims-based databases are valuable in providing the scale needed to explore low incidence events such as postoperative VTE, as this may not be feasible using data from one hospital or hospital system alone.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed using PearlDiver, a proprietary database containing de-identified and anonymized medical insurance billing claims from 91 million orthopedic patients with Commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance in the United States of America. This study was reviewed by the institutional review board of Hartford Healthcare and found to be exempt from review as the database utilized doesn’t contain identifiable protected health information. Informed consent was not required due to the anonymized nature of the data.

Patients who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between 2010 and 2019 were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 27130 (arthroplasty, acetabular and proximal femoral prosthetic replacement, with or without autograft or allograft) and 27447 (total knee arthroplasty). Patients were included in the final analysis if they (1) were 40–85 years of age and (2) had continuous insurance coverage for a year before and after the index procedure. Data analysis was performed from 4/17/2023 to 4/21/2023.

The primary outcome was the occurrence of acute VTE within three months of the index procedure. Data queries used the International Classification of Disease 9th Revision (ICD-9) and 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes to identify patients who developed acute pulmonary embolism (ICD-9 41.511; ICD-10 I26.99) or acute lower extremity DVT (ICD-9 45.340; ICD-10 I82.4Z9, I82.4Z3, I82.4Z2, I82.4Z1, I82.4Y9, I82.4Y3, I82.4Y2, I82.4Y1, I82.499, I82.493, I82.492, I82.491, I82.409, I82.403, I82.402, I82.401).

Previously identified VTE risk factors from our literature review were investigated for their association with acute VTE after arthroplasty [5,19]. The ICD-9 and 10 codes used to identify the risk factors are outlined in S1 Table. Risk factors were categorized as transient (arthroscopic hip or knee surgery within the year leading up to arthroplasty surgery and acute myocardial infarction) or persistent (70 years of age or older, sex, atrial fibrillation, cancer, congestive heart failure, hormone replacement therapy, hypertension, obesity, previous VTE, tobacco use, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and varicose veins).

Descriptive statistics were calculated for all demographic and outcome data. Binary and frequency-based data were presented as the percentage of the total study group to provide an epidemiological description of VTE after orthopedic surgery. Risk factors were grouped into one to eight concurrent risk factors. The incidence of acute VTE within three months after arthroplasty was compared for each risk factor using chi-square tests. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the relative weights of each risk factor. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between cumulative number of risk factors and acute VTE. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio software version 3.6.1 embedded within the PearlDiver platform. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05.

Results

A total of 988,675 patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty met the inclusion criteria: 14,827 patients developed acute VTE within three months of surgery, with an incidence of 1.5%. Of the patients with acute postoperative VTE, 72.8% (10,799 patients) underwent TKA and 27.2% (4,028 patients) underwent THA. Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis occurred in 20% (2,967) and 80.0% (11,860) of the patients, respectively.

The prevalence of the risk factors among all patients with TJA is shown in Table 1. Of the identified risk factors, nine were associated with increased odds of developing acute VTE after arthroplasty (Table 2). Risk factors for hip or knee arthroscopy within the year leading up to arthroplasty (100 patients, p = 0.203), history of hormone replacement therapy (28 patients, p = 0.433), female sex (9,119 patients, p = 0.213), and history of varicose veins (36 patients, p = 0.070) were not associated with the development of acute VTE. A history of VTE before arthroplasty was associated with lower odds of recurrent VTE (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79–0.96, p = 0.006), with 1.3% of patients with a history of VTE developing an acute VTE compared to 1.5% of patients without a history who went on to develop a VTE.

Table 1. Prevalence of risk factors among all arthroplasty patients.

Risk Factor Arthroplasty Patients (%)
Persistent Count %
  Females 603,172 61.0%
  Age ≥ 70 382,017 38.6%
  Hypertension 145,856 14.8%
  Obesity 68,185 6.9%
  Type 2 Diabetes 52,003 5.3%
  Tobacco Use 47,389 4.8%
  History of VTE 32,686 3.3%
  Atrial Fibrillation 21,953 2.2%
  Cancer 19,712 2.0%
  Congestive Heart Failure 14,134 1.4%
  Hormone Replacement Therapy 2,162 0.2%
  Varicose Veins 1,783 0.2%
Transient
  Myocardial Infarction 12,108 1.2%
  Arthroscopy 5,880 0.6%

Table 2. Number of patients with persistent and transient risk factors and odds of developing Acute VTE after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Risk Factor n %a OR 95% CI p
Persistent          
  Congestive Heart Failure 381 2.7% 1.84 1.66–2.04 <0.001
  Obesity 1284 1.9% 1.29 1.21–1.36 <0.001
Hypertension 2,705 1.3% 1.29 1.24–1.35 <0.001
  Atrial Fibrillation 418 1.9% 1.28 1.16–1.42 <0.001
  Type 2 Diabetes 975 1.9% 1.27 1.19–1.36 <0.001
  Cancer 369 1.9% 1.26 1.13–1.40 <0.001
  ≥ 70 years of age 6371 1.7% 1.20 1.16–1.24 <0.001
  Tobacco Use 804 1.7% 1.14 1.06–1.23 <0.001
History VTE 431 1.3% 0.87 0.79–0.96 0.006
Transient          
  Acute MI 218 1.5% 1.21 1.05–1.38 0.006

aThe percentage is based on the number of patients with the risk factor who developed an acute VTE after surgery.

A total of 7.0% (1,036 patients) of the patients who developed acute VTE had no additional risk factors (Table 3). Among patients with multiple persistent risk factors, with TJA without any risk factors as the baseline, three or more risk factors were associated with an increased risk of developing acute VTE after surgery, with a stronger association noted with every additional risk factor (Fig 1).

Table 3. Impact of cumulative risk factors and odds of developing Acute VTE after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Risk Factor count n %a OR 95% CI p
TJA as independent risk factor 1,036 0.5%
TJA + 1 1,141 1.4% 0.61 0.58–0.64 <0.001
TJA + 2 3,250 1.6% 0.81 0.78–0.84 <0.001
TJA + 3 3,970 1.8% 1.04 1.01–1.08 0.01
TJA + 4 3,066 2.1% 1.36 1.31–1.41 <0.001
TJA + 5 1,569 2.4% 1.53 1.45–1.62 <0.001
TJA + 6 612 2.7% 1.78 1.64–1.93 <0.001
TJA + 7 154 3.0% 1.92 1.63–2.26 <0.001
TJA + 8 29 4.5% 2.98 2.00–4.24 <0.001

aThe percentage is based on the number of patients with risk factors developing an acute VTE after surgery.

Fig 1. Percentage of patients with one or more persistent risk factors, comparing those who developed acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) to those who remained VTE-free during the three months following total hip or knee arthroplasty (TJA).

Fig 1

Persistent risk factors in this analysis included age ≥ 70 years, cancer, congestive heart failure, obesity, persistent atrial fibrillation, tobacco use, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.

Discussion

This study explored the association of multiple concurrent VTE risk factors with the occurrence of acute VTE after arthroplasty in a PearlDiver database sample of 988,675 adults in the US. We found that three or more concurrent risk factors were associated with a higher risk than two or fewer risk factors, and a progressive increase in risk was noted with each additional risk factor.

Individual risk factors

Persistent risk factors were associated with higher odds of developing acute VTE. Patients with congestive heart failure had the highest odds of developing acute VTE within three months of surgery. Obesity, hypertension, persistent atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cancer were individually associated with a 26–29% increase in the odds of developing acute VTE. Our results are supported by other studies reporting an association between older age [6,7,9,10], obesity [20], and atrial fibrillation with the incidence of acute VTE.

There is ambiguity regarding the roles of sex, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, varicose veins, hypertension, and hormone replacement as risk factors. Several studies have reported a variable association between sex and VTE risk factor among arthroplasty patients [10,1719,21], whereas other authors found no association between sex and DVT [12,22]. We observed a similar incidence of acute VTE in males and females. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension are potential risk factors [19,2325]. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension may not directly cause thrombosis but can be associated with cardiovascular disease, which may contribute to an increased risk.

Addressing potentially modifiable VTE risk factors may be a plausible strategy for reducing the burden of acute VTE; however, this was not the focus of the present study. We identified obesity, tobacco use, and type 2 diabetes mellitus as potential risk factors. Weight loss strategies [26], smoking cessation treatments [27], and diabetes management [28] may play a role in decreasing VTE risk, which should be studied in future research.

Multiple risk factors

Arthroplasty is an independent transient risk factor for acute VTE. Anderson et al. [29] noted a higher risk of acute VTE with Hip and knee arthroplasty as an independent risk factor. Our results showed that TJA patients with no additional risk factors had similar odds of developing acute VTE compared to TJA patients with one or two risk factors; however, the risk increased when three or more persistent risk factors were present. Evaluating the cumulative impact of VTE risk factors on Acute VTE in a robust sample size was a unique aspect of our study.

Our study had several limitations secondary to the inherent limitations of utilizing a billing-based database. The Pearldiver database does not contain prescription data; therefore, we were unable to assess whether chemical prophylaxis with enoxaparin or another anticoagulant was prescribed or its postoperative duration. The lower odds of acute VTE with established risk factors, such as hormone replacement therapy and prior history of VTE, might have been due to the use of chemical prophylaxis. Additional limitations include the lack of clinical context and details on the status of persistent risks. For example, a diagnosis of diabetes is available, but appropriate laboratory values such as hemoglobin A1c are not available; hence, it is not feasible to determine whether diabetes is well-controlled or poorly controlled. Finally, due to the retrospective design, there is a possibility of selection bias and residual confounding. Despite these limitations, we believe that the robust sample size provides strength and validity to our findings regarding the cumulative impact of multiple concurrent risk factors.

Conclusion

This study adds to the current understanding of persistent and transient risk factors for patients undergoing lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty in a large sample size (988,675 patients). Most individual persistent risk factors increase the odds of acute VTE by 20–30%. Three or more concurrent persistent risk factors were associated with a higher increased risk of postoperative VTE, with an incremental increase in risk with each additional risk factor. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to report that the risk of VTE progressively increases in the presence of multiple risk factors.

Supporting information

S1 Table. International classification of disease versions 9 and 10 and current procedural terminology used to query risk factors.

(DOCX)

pone.0308813.s001.docx (13.7KB, docx)

Data Availability

The data is owned by PearlDiver, a proprietary database containing de-identified and anonymized medical insurance billing claims from 91 million orthopedic patients with Commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance in the United States of America. Data cannot be shared publicly to protect patient privacy. Researchers may buy a subscription and analyze the data within their proprietary platform. https://pearldiverinc.com/contact/ Email - info@pearldiverinc.com.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by an internal grant # 126736 from the Hartford Hospital medical staff (The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript).

References

  • 1.Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD. Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020–2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample. J Rheumatol. 2019;46: 1134–1140. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bawa H, Weick JW, Dirschl DR, Luu HH. Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis and Deep Vein Thrombosis Rates After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26: 698–705. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beckman MG, Hooper WC, Critchley SE, Ortel TL. Venous Thromboembolism: A Public Health Concern. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010;38: S495–S501. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kearon C, Ageno W, Cannegieter S, Cosmi B, Geersing G, Kyrle P, et al. Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14: 1480–1483. doi: 10.1111/jth.13336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang ZH, Shen B, Yang J, Zhou ZK, Kang P De, Pei FX. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of evidences in ten years. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015;16: 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0470-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Keeney JA, Clohisy JC, Curry MC, Maloney WJ. Efficacy of Combined Modality Prophylaxis Including Short-Duration Warfarin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2006;21: 469–475. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.SooHoo NF, Lieberman JR, Ko CY, Zingmond DS. Factors Predicting Complication Rates Following Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2006;88: 480–485. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Samama CM, Ravaud P, Parent F, Barré J, Mertl P, Mismetti P. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism after lower limb arthroplasty: The FOTO study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2007;5: 2360–2367. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02779.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mraovic B, Hipszer BR, Epstein RH, Pequignot EC, Parvizi J, Joseph JI. Preadmission Hyperglycemia is an Independent Risk Factor for In-Hospital Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism After Major Orthopedic Surgery. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2010;25: 64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khatod M, Inacio M, Bini S, Paxton E. Prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93: 1767–72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barrett J, Baron JA, Losina E, Wright J, Mahomed NN, Katz JN. Bilateral total knee replacement: Staging and pulmonary embolism. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A. 2006;88: 2146–2151. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pedersen AB, Sorensen HT, Mehnert F, Overgaard S, Johnsen SP. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement and receiving routine thromboprophylaxis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2010;92: 2156–2164. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dua A, Neiva S, Sutherland A. Does previous varicose vein surgery alter deep vein thrombosis risk after lower limb arthroplasty? Orthopaedic surgery. 2012;4: 222–226. doi: 10.1111/os.12003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schiff RL, Kahn SR, Shrier I, Strulovitch C, Hammouda W, Cohen E, et al. Identifying Orthopedic Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Despite Thromboprophylaxis. Chest. 2005;128: 3364–3371. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Werner BC, Burrus M, Novicoff W, Browne J. Total knee arthroplasty within six months after knee arthroscopy is associated with increased postoperative complications. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30: 1313–6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lemme N, Veeramani A, Yang D, Tabaddor R. Daniels AH, Cohen EM. Total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy has increased complications and revision risk. The Journal of Arthroplasty2. 2021;36: 3922–7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rinde L, Lind C, Småbrekke B, Njølstad I, Mathiesen E, Wilsgaard T, et al. Impact of incident myocardial infarction on the risk of venous thromboembolism: the Tromsø Study. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14. doi: 10.1111/jth.13329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Singh JA, Jensen MR, Harmsen WS, Gabriel SE, Lewallen DG. Cardiac and thromboembolic complications and mortality in patients undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011;70: 2082–2088. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.148726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Walter A, Becattini C, Brighton T, Selby R, Kamphuisen PW. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Venous Thromboembolism A Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2007;117: 93–102. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.709204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eichinger S, Hron G, Bialonczyk C, Hirschl M, Minar E, Wagner O, et al. Overweight, obesity, and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2008;168: 1678–1683. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lemme NJ, Veeramani A, Yang DS, Tabaddor RR, Daniels AH, Cohen EM. Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy Has Increased Complications and Revision Risk. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36: 3922–3927.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leizorovicz A, Turpie AGG, Cohen AT, Wong L, Yoo MC, Dans A. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in Asian patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery without thromboprophylaxis. The SMART Study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2005;3: 28–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01094.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Colwell J, Nesto R. The platelet in diabetes: focus on prevention of ischemic events. Diabetes care. 2003;26: 2181–8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.7.2181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferroni P, Basili S, Falco A, Davì G. Platelet activation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2004;2: 1282–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00836.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sakkinen P, Wahl P, Cushman M, Lewis M, Tracy R. Clustering of procoagulation, inflammation, and fibrinolysis variables with metabolic factors in insulin resistance syndrome. American journal of epidemiology. 2000;152: 897–907. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.10.897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Seward MW, Chen AF. Arthroplasty Obesity, preoperative weight loss, and telemedicine before total joint arthroplasty: a review. Arthroplasty. 2022; 2–9. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00102-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bedard NA, Demik DE, Owens JM, Glass NA, Deberg J, Callaghan JJ. Tobacco Use and Risk of Wound Complications and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2019;34: 385–396.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rudy MD, Ahuja NK, Aaronson AJ. Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Lower-Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty: Clinical Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Management. JBJS reviews. 2018. p. e10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Anderson FA, Spencer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Eyüp Serhat Çalık

8 Apr 2024

PONE-D-24-03155Multiple risk factors are associated with an incremental increase in Acute Venous Thromboembolism risk after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A PearlDiver Cohort StudyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by May 23 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Eyüp Serhat Çalık

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

Internal institutional funding from our hospital medical staff

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In the online submission form, you indicated that Aggregate data available with a subscription to PearlDiver

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval. 

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

Additional Editor Comments:

I congratulate the esteemed authors for this important study. Venous thromboembolism (VT) remains a common and important complication after total joint arthroplasty surgeries. I think it was important that your study revealed a significantly increased incidence of VT, especially when there are three or more cumulative risk factors. Although the insurance billing database you mentioned in the limitation section has limitations, we kindly request you to expand the results section by providing more detailed information about risk factors in line with the suggestions of the reviewers and discuss them in the discussion section. Good luck.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Needs more elaboration on the risk factors , and almost the risk factors are not well categorized this format the paper would provides incomplete and even non specific information about DVT particularly and specifically about post operative DVT.

Reviewer #2: Acute venous thromboembolism(VTE) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) was clinically very dangerous. Several risk factors are associated with it. t is very important to study the risk factors of the disease and carry out effective prevention, so this paper is of great significance and value to the clinic. The author's final conclusion was: persistent risk factors were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative VTE than transient risk factors. An incremental increase in risk was noted if three or more persistent risk factors were present. This is obvious and not particularly new. The article would be more meaningful if the various risk factors could be classified and the risk level or probability of each risk factor for VTE could be assessed.

Reviewer #3: This is an unprecedented and groundbreaking study that shows a risk score specific to total joint arthroplasty with respect to Acute VTE, which is good news for the field of total joint arthroplasty, where VTE is known to be common. The risk factors are expressed in terms of numbers, which is simplied and easy to understand. Independent factors have different risks, and I am not sure if this should be expressed in the same score. However, the simplified scores are extremely clear and easy to understand.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Aram Baram

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Eyüp Serhat Çalık

30 Jul 2024

Multiple risk factors are associated with an incremental increase in Acute Venous Thromboembolism risk after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A PearlDiver Cohort Study

PONE-D-24-03155R1

Dear Dr. Kumar,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Eyüp Serhat Çalık

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Eyüp Serhat Çalık

1 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-03155R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Eyüp Serhat Çalık

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. International classification of disease versions 9 and 10 and current procedural terminology used to query risk factors.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0308813.s001.docx (13.7KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers 5-29-2024.docx

    pone.0308813.s002.docx (18.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The data is owned by PearlDiver, a proprietary database containing de-identified and anonymized medical insurance billing claims from 91 million orthopedic patients with Commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid insurance in the United States of America. Data cannot be shared publicly to protect patient privacy. Researchers may buy a subscription and analyze the data within their proprietary platform. https://pearldiverinc.com/contact/ Email - info@pearldiverinc.com.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES