Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 13;280(3):452–462. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006387

TABLE 2.

Wound Characteristics

Total N=53 >Nonburn N=36 Burn N=17 P
Wound depth, N (%) <0.001
 Full-thickness 41 (77.4) 34 (94.4) 7 (41.2)
 Partial and full thickness 12 (22.6) 2 (5.6) 10 (58.8)
MESS grade (30 trauma patients) N=30 N=13 N=17
 Mean 3.87 4.85 3.11 0.01
 SD 1.96 1.68 1.87
 1 (no. patients, %) 4 (13.3) 0 (0) 4 (23.5)
 2 4 (13.3) 0 (0) 4 (23.5)
 3 6 (20) 4 (30.8) 2 (11.8)
 4 5 (16.7) 2 (15.4) 3 (17.6)
 5 4 (13.3) 2 (15.4) 2 (11.8)
 6 4 (13.3) 3 (23.1) 1 (5.9)
 7 2 (6.7) 1 (7.7) 1 (5.9)
 8 1 (3.3) 1(7.7) 0 (0)
Wound preparation, N (%) 0.07
 Allograft 11 (20.8) 6 (16.7) 5 (29.4)
 Integra 3 (5.6) 3 (8.3) 0
 Kerecis 26 (49.1) 21 (58.3) 5 (29.4) 0.05
 Myriad 1 (1.9) 1 (2.8) 0
 None 12 (22.6) 5 (13.9) 7 (41.2)
Wound size, cm2 (Med, IQR) 350 (154, 610) 400 (149, 691) 296 (158, 420) 0.12
Donor size, cm2 (Med, IQR) 175 (77, 300) 180 (79, 350) 120 (70, 210) 0.10
Recell size, cm2 (Med, IQR) 498 (220, 915) 590 (236, 993) 436 (213, 630) 0.10
Donor site coverage, n (%) 0.70
 Kerecis 29 (54.7) 21 (58.3) 8 (47.1)
 Suprathel 17 (32.1) 11 (30.6) 6 (35.3)
 Xeroform 7 (13.2) 4 (11.1) 3 (17.7)
EBL, mL (Med, IQR) 50 (25, 100) 50 (23, 75) 50 (30, 100) 0.42

EBL indicates estimated blood loss.