Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e38970. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038970

Table 2.

Comparative evaluation of patient characteristics before and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Before POEM Post-POEM P value
Pre-procedure 95% CI 3 days post-POEM 95% CI 12 months post-POEM 95% CI Pre-POEM vs 3 days post-POEM Pre-POEM vs 12 months post-POEM
Abnormal contraction lenght
3.2 + 0.4 cm [2.974–3.426] 0.2 ± 0.5 cm [0.083–0.483] 0.3 ± 0.6 cm [0.039–0.639] 0.0001 0.0001
Width of esophagus
3.7 ± 0.5 cm [3.417–3.983] 2.2 ± 0.4 [1.974–2.426] 2.0 ± 0.2 [1.887–2.113] 0.0001 0.0001
Contrast delay
22.3 ± 7.0 sec [18.339–26.261] 1.7 ± .3.7 sec [0.393–3.793] 2.1 ± .4.7 sec [0.559–4.759] 0.0001 0.0001
High resolution-manometory (IRP) mm Hg
26.8 ± 5.4 [21.508–32.092] NA NA 10.8 ± 1.1 [9.722–11.878] NA 0.0001
Eckardt score
7.0 ± 1.0 [6.434–7.566] 1.0 ± 1.7 [0.0382–1.962] 1.0 ± 1.7 [0.0382–1.962] 0.0001 0.0001