Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Jul 23;39:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100917

Table 3.

The estimated effect of the tax among stores within 1-mile of Seattle’s northern or southern border.

DID (95 % CI)1,2 Percent
Pass-through1,3
Taxed Beverages4 (n = 6,922) 1.42 (1.07, 1.76) * 81 %
Non-taxed Beverages5 (n = 7,256) 0.24 (−0.06, 0.53)

CI = confidence interval; DID = difference-in-difference.

1

Balanced models include beverages (unique brand, specification and size) that were present in the same store at baseline and 6-month store audits.

2

Models include store fixed effects, beverage size, and beverage type as covariates. Standard errors are clustered at the store-level.

3

The percent of the 1.75 cents/ounce passed on to consumers.

4

Taxed beverages include: soda, sports beverages, energy beverages, juice beverages, bottled tea, and bottled coffee.

5

Non-taxed beverages include: diet soda, diet sports drinks, diet energy beverages, 100 % juice, milk, water, powered sugar-free beverages, sugar-free bottled tea, sugar-free prepared coffee.

*

p < 0.05.