Abstract
Organic dusts are complex bioaerosol mixtures comprised of dust and particulate matter of organic origin. These include components from bacteria, fungi, pollen, and viruses to fragments of animals and plants commonplace to several environmental/occupational settings encompassing agriculture/farming, grain processing, waste/recycling, textile, cotton, woodworking, bird breeding, and more. Organic dust exposures are linked to development of chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, asthma-like syndrome, byssinosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Risk factors of disease development include cumulative dust exposure, smoking, atopy, timing/duration, and nutritional factors. The immunopathogenesis predominately involves Toll-like receptor signaling cascade, Th1/Th17 lymphocyte responses, neutrophil influx, and potentiation of manifestations associated with allergy. The true prevalence of airway disease directly attributed to organic dust, especially in a workplace setting, remains challenging. Diagnostic confirmation can be difficult and complicated by hesitancy from workers to seek medical care, driven by fears of potential labor-related consequence. Clinical respiratory and systemic presentations coupled with allergy testing, lung function patterns of obstructive versus restrictive disease, and radiological characteristics are typically utilized to delineate these various organic dust-associated respiratory diseases. Prevention, risk reduction, and management primarily focus on reducing exposure to the offending dust, managing symptoms, and preventing disease progression.
Keywords: organic dust, asthma, obstructive lung disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, fibrosis, occupational
INTRODUCTION
Organic dusts refer to a complex mixture of dust and particulate matter of organic origin including components from bacteria, fungi, pollen, and viruses to fragments of animals and plants (1). Organic dust exposures have been linked to development of chronic occupational airway diseases such as chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, asthma-like syndrome, byssinosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Establishing the true prevalence of airway disease directly attributed to organic dust, especially in a workplace setting, remains challenging. The diagnostic confirmation of occupational respiratory diseases can be difficult and complicated by hesitancy from workers to seek medical care, driven by fears of potential labor-related consequences (2). Workers with worsening symptoms tend to leave their jobs, and those without immediate symptoms remain in the workplace, which has been referred to as “the healthy worker effect” (3). This review will address risk factors contributing to disease development, immunopathogenesis, disease entities, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Industries commonly affected by organic dusts include agriculture and food production with high variability in concentration exposure typically related to tasks performed rather than herd size (3). In the dairy industry, milking and animal handling activities provided a higher risk of concentration exposure (3). In the avian industry, hatchery workers experience an increased prevalence of respiratory symptoms including cough and/or phlegm (4). Furthermore, workers assigned to avian sorting rooms also had a decrease of 11% in forced vital capacity (FVC) compared to those working in incubation rooms (4). Moreover, in a Norwegian study of farmers, livestock farmers had increased risk of chronic bronchitis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% confidence interval, CI): 1.9 (1.4–2.6) and COPD (aOR: 1.4 (1.1–1.7)) when compared to crop farmers after adjustment for potential confounders including age, gender, and smoking status (5). A meta-analysis by Guillien et al. demonstrated a positive association between farming exposure and airflow limitation or chronic bronchitis in 10 of 22 studies (OR: 1.77 (1.50–2.08)) with cattle, swine, poultry, and crop farming associated with either airflow limitation or chronic bronchitis (6).
In the waste and recycling sector, organic dusts and volatile organic compounds were the highest during the sorting of materials in compost stations (7). In the textile industry, recognized to have high endotoxin exposure, byssinosis is an occupational respiratory disease due to exposure to cotton, hemp, or flax. Hinson et al. reported a prevalence of byssinosis of 44% amongst workers directly exposed to cotton dust in a textile company in Benin, West Africa (8). In the wood processing sector, Neghab et al. observed that 35% of Iranian sawmill workers experienced a 5% cross-work shift decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). This occurred despite the existence of recommended occupational exposure limits and precautions offered by occupational safety organizations (9).
IMMUNOPATHOGENESIS
Organic dusts are bioaerosols comprised of a diverse and wide array of organic particles, encompassing fragments from both animal and plant sources, alongside pro-inflammatory mediators such as gram-negative endotoxins or lipopolysaccharides (LPS), gram-positive peptidoglycans, and fungal (1–3) b-D-glucans, amongst others (10, 11). These exposures induce release of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines that typically drive the recruitment and activation of neutrophils, induce airway hyperresponsiveness, generate free radicals, and promote lymphocyte activation (12, 13). With repetitive exposures, airway remodeling and chronic disease develops (14). Whereas LPS is a notable element within organic dust, it is the “whole” composition (as opposed to one isolated agent) of organic dust mixtures that drive pathogenesis. For example, individuals exposed to pig barn dust had a more pronounced inflammatory response as evidenced by elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and total cell counts in sputum samples as compared to exposure to LPS alone, despite the concentration of LPS being several fold higher than what is encountered in pig barns (15).
Organic dust engages innate signaling pathways, mainly through the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules typically by Toll-like receptors (TLRs). TLR2, TLR4, TLR9, and the common adaptor protein myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) have been implicated in the acute inflammatory response to agricultural-related organic dust exposures (16–21). In murine studies, swine confinement facility organic dust extract-induced acute airway inflammatory responses (i.e., neutrophil influx, release of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-6 and neutrophil chemoattractants, and airway hyper-responsiveness) were nearly completely abrogated in MyD88-deficient mice (18). Furthermore, striking reduction in airway inflammatory responses remained after daily exposure for one week in MyD88-deficient mice (22), but there was enhanced airway mucous cell metaplasia (23). Correspondingly, acute organic dust exposure in humans is also associated with cellular infiltration and increased cytokine production ascribed to TLR signaling. Namely, Hedelin et al. demonstrated increases in nasal lavage total and blood neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils following a 3-hour exposure to swine dust with associated increases in monocyte expression of TLR2 and TLR4 (24). This response was reduced following the installment of fine particle separators (24).
Highlighting the importance of TLR signaling pathways, a missense mutation in TLR4 (Asp299Gly) have been associated with hypo-responsiveness to inhalant LPS exposure with decreased NF-κB activity, decreased IL-1⍺ production, and decreased airway epithelial TLR4 receptor (25). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TLR10-TLR1-TLR6 gene cluster have also been associated with ex vivo whole blood IL-6 (but not TNF-⍺) hyper-responsiveness to organic dust and gram-positive components in agricultural workers (26). CD14 is a receptor for LPS, and the CD14/−159 T allele polymorphism has been associated with increased circulating levels of CD14 and increased prevalence of wheezing without association in lung function in farmers (27). In this same study, there was no association between TLR4/Asp299Gly and lung function or wheeze in farmers (27). Otherwise, there is a paucity of data understanding the role of genetic susceptibility in organic dust associated respiratory diseases.
As compared to the robust acute inflammatory response to a one-time organic dust exposure, repetitive exposures result in a comparative reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines levels but persistence of lung neutrophils, lymphocytes, and recruited monocyte/macrophages in animals studies, which has been termed the chronic inflammatory adaptation response (22, 28). Similarly, a one-time organic dust exposure induces an increase in airway hyper-responsiveness in mice, and this response is lost with repetitive exposures (29), consistent with the adaptation response but differs from experimental allergy asthma murine models. Correspondingly, pig farmers demonstrated an attenuation of symptoms, lung function, bronchial responsiveness, and markers of airway inflammation as compared to first-time exposed naïve individuals (15). Nevertheless, these pig farmers had markers of low grade, persistent inflammation as compared to never-exposed individuals (15).
Organic dust exposures can induce the recruitment of CD4+ T helper (Th) 1 cells, Th2 cells, Th17 cells, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), airway epithelial cells, and monocyte/macrophage activation responses (30–32). In animal models, organic dust extract exposure induces lung alarmin IL-33 release, Th1/Th17 responses, and increased serum IgE levels without evidence for a Th2-mediated response or airway eosinophil influx (22, 33). Th17 cells and IL-17 are recognized to induce the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages, contributing to the pathogenesis of asthma and COPD (34, 35). In Severe Equine Asthma Syndrome, a naturally occurring chronic organic dust airway disease in horses that shares similarities with asthma in humans, a similar Th17 response has also been demonstrated (36).
Regulators of organic dust-associated airway inflammatory response include the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In a cross-sectional study of 625 veterans with farming experience, higher baseline blood concentrations of IL-10 were associated with higher FEV1/FVC and inversely associated with whole blood stimulated ΔTNF-α and ΔIL-6 (37). In IL-10 deficient mice, organic dust extract-induced airway inflammation, neutrophil influx, and lung pathology were elevated, and this response was reversed with IL-10 supplementation (38). Furthermore, short-term, lung-delivered recombinant IL-10 favorably hastened airway inflammatory recovery processes following acute, high dose inhalant LPS exposure in mice (39). In addition, airway cathelicidin (LL-37), an antimicrobial and LPS neutralizing peptide implicated in tissue repair (40), was increased in farmers with and without COPD versus healthy urban persons (41). In advanced stages of COPD, LL-37 levels have been found to decrease, possibly highlighting the role of this peptide in antimicrobial protection (42).
RISK FACTORS
Cumulative exposure to organic dust represents an important factor in disease development. In a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia, there was a high incidence of chronic respiratory symptoms in flour mill workers (43). The presence of chronic respiratory symptoms was associated with working in the mixing department (aOR (CI): 5.3 (1.68–16.56)), work experience of 6–9 years (aOR: 5.1 (2.05–12.48)), work experience ≥10 years (aOR: 2.5, (1.01–6.11)), and working ≥8 hours per day (aOR: 2.4 (1.16–5.10)) (43). The degree of exposure is also important. Andersson et al. demonstrated that each year of high exposure to soft paper dust (defined as >5mg/m3) was associated with a 0.87% predicted decrease in FEV1 (CI: −1.39 to −0.35) and a 0.54% decrease in FVC (CI: −1.00 to −0.08) (44). In contrast, a Danish register-based cohort study did not find an association between the cumulative organic dust exposure and COPD in the farming or wood industry despite lagging their variables 10 years to consider the period of disease development of COPD and the healthy worker survivor effect (45). Instead, they noted a decreased risk of COPD in the highest exposed group (adjusted rate ratio:0.63 (0.56–0.70)) (45). However, it was suggested that tobacco smoke may have confounded the results to suggest need for additional longitudinal studies (45). Indeed, the co-influence of tobacco smoking is important. Guillam et al. demonstrated lower forced expiratory flow between 25–75% of vital capacity and forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity in duck hatchery workers who smoked compared to non-smoking workers (4).
The role of atopy as a risk factor is less clear. Dairy farmers who had persistent airflow limitation were more likely to have at least 3 positive tests for allergen-specific IgE when compared to dairy farmers without persistent airflow limitation (46). House dust endotoxin has been associated with atopic and non-atopic asthma in farming populations across the United States (U.S). In a large case-control study involving a cohort of farmers and their spouses, Carnes et al. demonstrated that increasing endotoxin levels was associated with higher odds of current asthma (unadjusted OR: 1.30 (1.14–1.47)), and moreover, endotoxin was associated with atopic asthma (aOR: 1.38 (1.09–1.74)) and non-atopic asthma (aOR: 1.24 (1.07–1.43)) after adjustment for sex, smoking status, race, and season (47).
Timing of exposure may also be important. Exposing mice to Amish organic dust extracts prior to the onset of experimental allergen-induced asthma sensitization and challenge resulted in reduced airway inflammatory outcomes (48). In contrast, when mice were exposed to swine confinement organic dust extracts after allergen-induced asthma sensitization and challenge phase, there was potentiation of airway inflammatory outcomes (49). Amongst U.S. farmers, a non-linear relationship between endotoxin and asthma was described, with higher endotoxin levels associated with current asthma (OR: 1.30 (1.14–1.47)) and modifiable by early-life farm exposure (47). Notably, the association between dust endotoxin and asthma was higher in individuals not born on a farm (OR: 1.67 (1.26–2.20)) compared to those who were (OR: 1.18 (1.02–1.37)). This highlights that the “protective effect” of early-life farming exposure may be linked to endotoxin exposure (47, 48).
The impact of age as a risk factor for the development of organic dust airway disease has been difficult to establish. Earlier studies (1990’s) demonstrated that a relative excess of respiratory symptoms and reduced lung function were higher among swine producers aged 26–35 years, which may have reflected more intense exposures (50). It has also been demonstrated that “young (7–9 week)” mice had a more robust inflammatory response to swine confinement organic dust exposures as compared to “older (12–14 month)” mice (51).
Micronutrient deficiencies represent global health concerns (52) and may represent an additional risk factor. Nutritional zinc insufficiency has been associated with lower pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC, p=0.03; trends for FEV1, p=0.056) among veterans with history of farm exposure in COPD individuals (53). In animal studies, dietary vitamin D (54) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, omega-3 fatty acid) (55) supplementation demonstrated reduced airway inflammatory indices following exposure to organic dust extracts. Thus, nutritional approaches may potentially reduce organic dust-associated airway inflammation, but future studies in humans are necessary. A summary of the risk factors and respiratory disease(s) associated with organic dust exposure is shown in Table I.
Table I.
Risk factors associated with development of organic dust associated respiratory diseases.
| Risk factor | Respiratory disease |
|---|---|
| Cumulative exposure | COPD/Chronic bronchitis Hypersensitivity pneumonitis Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis |
| Very high concentration, one-time exposure | Organic dust toxic syndrome Hypersensitivity pneumonitis |
| Tobacco smoking | COPD/Chronic bronchitis Byssinosis |
| Composition of organic dust (e.g., endotoxin) | Atopic and non-atopic asthma COPD/chronic bronchitis Byssinosis |
| Age* (e.g., young adults) | Obstructive lung disease |
| Atopy* | Asthma |
| Timing of exposure (e.g., late- vs. early-life exposure) | Atopic and non-atopic asthma COPD/Chronic bronchitis |
| Micronutrient deficiencies* (e.g., Zinc deficiency) | COPD/Chronic bronchitis |
Additional studies are needed to fully understand its impact in the development of respiratory diseases.
RESPIRATORY DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH ORGANIC DUST EXPOSURES
ORGANIC DUST TOXIC SYNDROME
Organic dust toxic syndrome (ODTS) is a complex disease entity that can develop acutely, usually occurring within hours of exposure to very high dust concentrations, also referred to as acute febrile syndrome or grain fever. The risk of its development increases with concentration and duration of exposure. Symptoms include fever with generalized malaise, myalgias, dyspnea, non-productive cough, chest tightness, and nausea (56). Laboratory testing typically reveals leukocytosis with neutrophilia. Chest imaging, oxygen saturation, and pulmonary function test may be unremarkable (57). Most cases of ODTS are mild, with symptoms usually resolving within 24 hours, but can persist for 2–5 days (56). In contrast to HP, ODTS lacks prior sensitization to antigens driving its pathogenesis. Furthermore, the role of corticosteroid therapy remains uncertain in ODTS (58).
ASTHMA
Adult exposure to organic dusts in industries such as farming, soft paper, and cotton are associated with an increased risk of developing asthma (59). A comprehensive meta-analysis revealed that exposure to dust from paper/wood, flour/grain, and textiles can raise the risk of asthma by 48% (60), but information regarding pre-existing asthma was not included. Reducing exposure also decreases the frequency of asthma exacerbations (61). The term “asthma-like syndrome” refers to acute, nonallergic airway responses commonly seen in agricultural settings, characterized by chest tightness, wheezing, and/or shortness of breath. This syndrome may also manifest as a cross-shift decline in FEV1, often linked to acute neutrophilic airway inflammation. Unlike classic asthma, this syndrome can occur upon first exposure, suggesting an inflammatory rather than an allergic reaction.
BYSSINOSIS
Byssinosis refers to a specific respiratory disease directly caused by cotton dust (textile industry). Breathlessness, cough, and chest tightness are more severe at the start of the workweek but may evolve to include productive cough and exertional dyspnea with repeated exposures (62). Tobacco smoking is an additional risk factor (63). Ocular and nasal irritation may also be present (64). Disease progression has been categorized into distinct stages. Initially, there is a stage of irritation (0–5 years), which often improves upon cessation of exposure. The next phase is temporary incapacity, usually occurring after 10+ years. The final stage involves complete disability, characterized by chronic bronchitis and emphysema (65). Diagnosis is based on the World Health Organization grading system and Schilling criteria that includes symptoms and the weekday affected (8). The severity of byssinosis correlates with a more rapid decline in pulmonary function (66, 67). Note, swine confinement workers also report worsening respiratory symptoms with weekday exposure and improvement when away from work (68) and these symptoms are rarely related to allergy to porcine proteins (69–71).
COPD/Chronic Bronchitis
The prevalence of COPD/chronic bronchitis among nonsmokers varies between 2 and 4.2% (72) with a systematic review demonstrating associations between farming exposure (i.e., cattle, swine, poultry and crop farming) and airflow limitation or chronic bronchitis (73). Livestock farmers were more likely to have chronic bronchitis (OR: 1.9 (1.4–2.6)) and COPD (OR: 1.4 (1.1 to 1.7)) as compared to crop farmers (74). Farmers with allergy have significantly lower FEV1, and the effects of farming and specific agents on COPD were substantially greater in farmers with atopy (74). Despite modernization efforts in the dairy industry that have reduced COPD prevalence (75, 76), traditional dairy farming remains a risk factor for COPD with additive smoking effects observed (77). In poultry work, prevalence rates of COPD were higher in individuals with longer exposure regardless of smoking status (78). In cotton work, particularly those exposed to both jute and hemp dust, the frequency of chronic bronchitis in retired workers who previously smoked was higher (20%) as compared to currently smoking workers (17%) (79). Working in dense dust areas, active smoking, being older than 40 years of age, being an ex-smoker, and working in the factory for a period exceeding 15 years were significantly associated with bronchitis and emphysema development (79).
ASTHMA-COPD OVERLAP
Asthma and COPD are prevalent respiratory conditions that can overlap in 15%−20% of patients (80), referred to as Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO). Individuals with COPD displaying asthmatic characteristics, as well as asthma patients with a history of smoking who develop non-fully reversible airflow obstruction, fall into this ACO category (81). Diagnosis of ACO in COPD patients typically reflects presence of reversible airflow obstruction, type 2 inflammation with airway or peripheral blood eosinophilia, or a previous physician’s diagnosis of asthma (82).
The association of ACO with work-related asthma (WRA) or organic dust exposure is not well-established. A U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey found that 51.9% of adults with WRA and 25.6% of those with non-WRA had also been diagnosed with COPD (83). Those with concurrent WRA and COPD experienced more severe asthma exacerbations and outcomes compared to those with non-WRA and no COPD. In a study identifying ACO in an OA cohort of 304 subjects by Ojanguren et al. in Montreal (84), 86% were diagnosed with OA alone and 14% with occupational ACO. The occupational ACO group was older, required higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids, had longer exposure to offending agents, was more frequently exposed to low molecular weight agents, and showed less atopy compared to the OA group (84). In Finland, a study highlighted the significant association between the risk of ACO and the presence of mold odor in the workplace (85). A Finnish study demonstrated that asthma patients exposed to vapors, gases, dust, or fumes in their occupation were more likely to develop ACO compared to those without such exposures (86).
HYPERSENSITIVITY PNEUMONITIS
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), also known as extrinsic allergic alveolitis, is a complex syndrome caused by a non-IgE-mediated allergic reaction to organic particles or low molecular weight agents involving type III (immune complex-mediated) and type IV (delayed-type hypersensitivity) reactions (87). Symptoms can vary widely depending on the duration and intensity of exposure and typically include cough, fever, chills, dyspnea, and fatigue. These symptoms can appear acutely, often 4–8 hours after exposure, or develop insidiously, particularly if the exposure to the antigen persists. Lung inflammation is characterized by lymphocytic and frequently granulomatous features that can result in lung fibrosis (87). The occupational causes of HP have been recently described in a systematic review (88), which includes farmers (farmer’s lung) and bird breeders or pet bird owners (bird fancier’s lung) as well as woodworking, cheese manufacturing, and textiles. Diagnosing HP involves a combination of clinical evaluation, lung imaging, lung function tests, and sometimes lung biopsies (89). The primary treatment for HP is avoidance of the offending antigen. Corticosteroids are often used. In advanced fibrotic stages, management is more complex, requiring additional intervention including possible lung transplantation.
IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause, primarily occurring in older adults. It is defined by the presence of radiological and/or histological usual interstitial pneumonia and has a poor prognosis with a median survival of 2.5–4 years (90). Although organic dust exposures have been proposed in the development and/or exacerbation of IPF, its direct link to IPF remains unclear (91). An international collaborative review and meta-analysis assigned an attributable fraction for occupational exposures to the burden of IPF of 26%, calculated from 11 studies (92). In this study, several exposure categories (vapors/gases/dust/fumes, metal dust, wood dust, silica dust) but not agricultural dust were significantly associated with IPF (92). However, a U.S. multicenter, case-control study identified several occupations which were associated with IPF that included farming, livestock, hairdressing, raising birds, stone cutting/polishing, and jobs with exposure to metal dust and vegetable/animal dust (93). Awadalla et al., in a multicenter, case-control study in Egypt, demonstrated that the risk of IPF was higher in females working in farming, raising birds, and with occupational exposures to animal feeds, dust, and pesticides (94). Moreover, a case-control study in Italy found that farmers, veterinarians, and gardeners had a particularly high risk of developing IPF, and the risk increased with increased lengths of exposure (95).
The issue of incorrectly diagnosing chronic HP as IPF has been raised. A 2013 study revealed that out of 46 patients initially diagnosed with IPF following established guidelines, 20 were later found to have HP (96). Many of these cases were associated with bird-related antigens, particularly from feather bedding (96). De Sadeleer et al. segmented 244 patients with IPF to demonstrate that IPF patients with a history of exposure to mold or birds had improved survival rates compared to those without such exposure, although survival was less than that of HP (97).
DIAGNOSTIC STRATEGIES
Presentation
Organic dust exposure generally triggers symptoms of cough, chest tightness, wheezing, mucus production, and shortness of breath, even in healthy individuals. In asthma and COPD, exposure can further exacerbate symptoms, reduce lung function, and increase in airway hyperresponsiveness (98). Flu-like symptoms can be found in ODTS and HP, and progression to irreversible pulmonary fibrosis, restriction, and diminished diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) can be seen in HP and IPF (87, 90). Clinical, functional, and radiological characteristics of organic dust-associated respiratory disease are summarized (Table II) (99).
Table II.
Characteristics and diagnostic features associated with various organic dust-associated respiratory diseases
| Organic dust-associated disease | Clinical Symptoms | Causative Agents | Diagnostic procedures | Lung function testing | Imaging |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthma | Respiratory | Livestock & crop dusts, wood dust, cotton dust, mold, pollens, bacteria, chemicals | Possible eosinophilia ± Specific allergen sensitivity |
Variable obstructive pattern Cross-shift ↓ in FEV1 >10% |
Normal, bronchial wall thickening, air trapping |
| Asthma-like syndrome | Respiratory | Grain and farming dust, mold, bacteria, chemicals | Allergen skin testing is typically negative ±airway neutrophils |
Variable obstructive pattern Cross-shift ↓ FEV1, <10% |
Normal, bronchial wall thickening, air trapping |
| Byssinosis | Respiratory | Cotton dust | Allergen skin testing is typically negative | Variable airflow limitation Across workday variability |
Normal, bronchial wall thickening to opacities |
| Organic dust toxic syndrome | Respiratory & systemic | High concentrations of organic dust | Leukocytosis, specific IgE and IgG testing is typically negative | Normal with possible obstructive or restrictive pattern | Normal, ground-glass opacities possible |
| COPD, chronic bronchitis | Respiratory & systemic | Livestock & crop dust, wood dust, cotton dust, mold, bacteria, chemicals | ± Skin testing, may be positive in ACO | Obstructive pattern with limited reversibility | Air-trapping, bronchiectasis, emphysema |
| Hypersensitivity pneumonitis | Respiratory & systemic | Mold, bacteria, avian proteins, vegetable & animal dust, chemicals | Specific IgG detection, ↑BALF CD8+ T cells, airway neutrophils | Restrictive pattern, reduced DLCO | Mosaicism, ground-glass opacities, centrilobular nodules, reticulation, traction bronchiectasis |
| Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis | Respiratory & systemic | Vapors, gases, dust, fumes, metal dust, wood dust, silica dust | Allergy skin testing typically negative, UIP lung biopsy | Restrictive pattern (irreversible at late stage), reduced DLCO | Honeycombing, ground-glass opacities, traction bronchiectasis, reticulation |
COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, DLCO: Diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide, FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in one second, UIP: Usual interstitial pneumonia
TESTING
Lung function
Lung function testing is recommended in exposed, at-risk persons, as spirometry is particularly valuable for workers with pre-existing obstructive diseases or smokers (100, 101) to monitor lung function over time and establish a dose-response effect (102, 103). For example, swine confinement workers often exhibit an accelerated loss of lung function, evidenced by a decrease in FEV1 during a work shift (104, 105). Changes in lung function (FEV1) across a workweek, particularly in textile workers, aid in predicting disease (106). A restrictive ventilatory defect may also be observed in HP or IPF, as well as impaired gas exchange (reduced DLCO) and/or hypoxemia during exercise (107).
Measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may also be warranted. Exhaled NO increased from baseline value of 7.5 (5.7–13.7) to 13.4 (10.5–17.5) parts per billion after swine facility exposure (108). In addition, the rise in FeNO post-work shift, along with diminished pulmonary function, established across-shift FeNO as an effective, non-invasive method to assess airway inflammation in textile workers (109). Serial FeNO measurements at home versus work settings can further validate a dose-response relationship (110).
Laboratory tests
The detection of serum-specific IgE and IgG antibodies of organic dust components can be beneficial to establishing causation. For example, patients with grain dust-induced symptoms may be sensitized to dust mites or cereal flour proteins (i.e., wheat, rye, and barley) (111). However, the presence of specific IgE antibodies may not be indicative of symptomatic exposure, as in individuals exposed to corn dust, where specific IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibodies were identified in both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects (112). Conversely, a cohort study of workers with asthma-like symptoms following grain dust exposure, confirmed through inhalation challenges, lacked evidence for specific serum antibodies (113).
The identification of antigen-specific IgG antibodies is a key diagnostic criterion for HP (Table I). Elevated antibody titers following exposure, or a decrease in levels after avoiding exposure, can further support this diagnosis. However, the absence of these antibodies does not rule out the disease, and their presence alone is not definitive, as they may merely indicate exposure in asymptomatic individuals (87). In a study involving asymptomatic swine confinement workers, the presence of IgG antibodies to specific porcine proteins was noted, while IgE-mediated reactions to these proteins were rare (71).
Skin testing
Allergy skin prick testing may also be useful. Over 15% of grain handlers exhibiting airway symptoms demonstrated sensitization by skin testing to storage mites (Lepidoglyphus destructor and Acarus siro) and molds (Candida) (114). Additionally, skin test sensitization to wheat and rye has been linked to a decrease in lung function during a work shift in grain workers (102). However, the relationship between asthmatic response and symptoms with positive grain dust extract skin testing remains unclear (113, 114). An improvement of quality and standardization of these complex allergen extracts may potentially increase diagnostic accuracy (111).
Bronchoalveolar lavage
Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analyses represents an additional tool to characterize the pattern of airway inflammation. BALF from workers recently exposed to swine environments demonstrated increased levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages compared to those exposed for longer durations (115, 116). Moreover, higher BALF concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8/CXCL8, and TNF-α were demonstrated in exposed versus non-exposed individuals (117). Notably, swine workers with at least 1.6 years of exposure demonstrated increased levels of IL-6, whereas TNF-α was not detected following acute exposure (118). In chronic stages of exposure, BALF may reveal an increased concentration of total cells, neutrophils, albumin, fibronectin, and hyaluronan (104) and striking increases in BALF cell mRNA for IL-17A (119).
In HP, the BALF cellular profile is typically characterized by marked lymphocytosis (greater than 50%) and a predominance of CD8+ T cells (also reflected in a low CD4+/CD8+ ratio) (87). This pattern is common in the acute and subacute stages of the disease. Following intense exposure or during resolution stages, a significant increase in neutrophils may also be observed.
BALF can be used to distinguish between exposed workers who develop HP or alveolitis and those who remain asymptomatic. This distinction is based on a low CD4+/CD8+ ratio for HP and elevated levels of hyaluronan for alveolitis (87, 116). Despite these indicators, limited data have been demonstrated for significant differences in cell counts within BALF between farmers exhibiting respiratory symptoms and those without symptoms (120). This highlights a need for further research to validate the efficacy of BALF in differentiating symptomatic from asymptomatic exposed workers as most studies compare exposed workers (including symptomatic and asymptomatic workers) with unexposed controls (104, 116).
Inhalation challenges
Inhalation challenges have confirmed the capacity of organic dust to induce respiratory symptoms and enabled analysis of lung function and inflammation profiles (121, 122). Inhalation tests using extracts from durum wheat and corn dust have proven particularly useful in demonstrating airway hyperresponsiveness in grain handlers (123). These challenges have also been useful in assessing the impact of endotoxins and dust mites in triggering airway inflammation in sensitized patients, although the results have been mixed (113, 114, 124). In cases of suspected HP, inhalation challenges are recommended to help identify the specific causative agent. The effectiveness, applications, and safety of allergen challenge tests in respiratory disorders have been recently reevaluated (125). These tests are predominately viewed as tools for research purposes. In the United States, inhalation challenges to identify the cause of HP are generally not performed, primarily due to regulatory constraints.
Imaging
Chest imaging, notably high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), can assess the disease activity and aid in diagnosis (Table I) (99). Chest radiograph findings are often nonspecific, including patterns like ground-glass or interstitial opacities, consolidations, or micronodules, but may appear normal in many patients (87). HRCT is recommended for symptomatic individuals with abnormal lung function tests, and it is valuable in determining the necessity and location for lung biopsy (126). In the active or early stages of disease, transient pulmonary infiltrates, isolated diffuse ground-glass opacities, mosaicism, and centrilobular nodules may be observed (127). Bronchial wall thickening and air trapping can be identified in obstructive diseases like asthma and COPD/chronic bronchitis (128). In HP, mosaicism and diffuse ground-glass centrilobular nodules may indicate small airway involvement. During the fibrotic stages HP and IPF, features such as reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, and architectural distortion are observed, signaling irreversible disease (127).
MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
The management of airway diseases caused by organic dust involves both supportive care and standard medical interventions. The primary focus is on reducing exposure to the offending dust, managing symptoms, and preventing disease progression (Table III). Industries that have adopted newer built buildings with modern and presumedcleaner technologies have shown better respiratory health outcomes than older counterparts (129). Although personal protective equipment (PPE) such as respirators are recommended and can reduce airway inflammatory consequences in swine barn workers (130), PPE has not been shown to reduce swine barn air-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (130). Moreover, lung function decline occurs in cotton textile mill workers despite use of a face mask (62).
Table III.
Exposure reduction and environmental controls for management and prevention strategies of organic dust exposure-associated lung disease.
| Focus Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Environmental Risk Assessment | Applicable to agriculture, textile, woodworking, and construction industries. Avoidance of high dust and endotoxin exposure tasks. However, this may not be socio-economically feasible (137). |
| Environmental Monitoring | Regular air quality monitoring. Use of air sampling devices to measure the concentration of organic dust particles. |
| Environmental Controls | Implementation of engineering controls -Improving ventilation systems (138). -Incorporating dust extraction and collection systems. -Using mobile recirculating ventilation systems (139). -Ensuring that machinery and equipment are well-maintained. |
| Work Practice Controls | Modification of task execution to reduce dust exposure. -Wetting down surfaces to prevent dust from becoming airborne. -Using tools and machinery that produce less dust. -Ensuring proper cleaning and maintenance procedures. -Adopting newer, cleaner technologies (129). |
| Personal Protective Equipment: | Incorporation of PPE: masks, respirators, and protective clothing. -Proper training and education are required. |
| Education and Training | Workers should be educated on: - Risks of organic dust exposure. - Recognizing hazardous conditions. - Proper use of control measures and PPE. Regular training sessions can reinforce this knowledge and keep workers informed about new practices or equipment. |
| Policy and Regulation Compliance | -Compliance with local and international health and safety regulations. -Adherence to occupational exposure limits for different types of dust. -Implementation of recommended safety practices. |
| Worker Health Surveillance and Education | -Baseline/pre-work health examinations. -Regular health examinations, including lung function tests, chest x-rays, and allergy testing. -Education on trigger avoidance and proper medication use. -Support groups and counseling can also be beneficial. -Smoking cessation, as smoking represents an additive effect. -Medical plan with rescue inhalers, bracelets as necessary. |
PPE: Personal protective equipment
Pharmacological Treatment
Pharmacologic treatment can be dependent upon the severity and type of airway disease. Available therapies include bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and antihistamines; however, there is no evidence that use of inhaled bronchodilators alleviates symptoms or slows disease progression (99). Biologics including the anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, omalizumab, has been successfully used in cases of severe occupational asthma caused by cereal allergens (131–133) and low molecular weight agents (134). Given that workers exposed to organic dust typically exhibit a neutrophilic asthma phenotype/endotype (as opposed to eosinophilic phenotype), there may be theoretical benefit with treatments effective in Type-2-low asthma, such as tezepelumab (135). However, this therapy has not been specifically explored in symptomatic workers.
In severe HP or IPF, immunosuppressant agents including azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil may be used. Antifibrotic agents pirfenidone and nintedanib have also been utilized to slow the progression of IPF and lung function decline (136).
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Pulmonary rehabilitation may be necessary for those with significant respiratory impairment. This includes exercises to strengthen the respiratory muscles, improve lung function, and help with breath control.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The future research directions in the field of airway diseases associated with organic dust exposure are broad and multifaceted (Table IV). Advancements are necessary to improve the prevention, early detection, and effective management of airway diseases associated with organic dust exposure, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes for affected individuals.
Table IV.
Key Areas of future research and development to advance knowledge and care of individuals with organic dust-associated respiratory disease.
| Focus Area | Comment |
|---|---|
| Mechanism of Disease |
|
| Long-term Health Effects |
|
| Genetic and Environmental Interactions |
|
| Improved Diagnostic Tools |
|
| Better Exposure Assessment Methods |
|
| Preventive Strategies and Interventions |
|
| Treatment Modalities |
|
| Impact of Climate Change |
|
| Public Health Policies |
|
| Global Perspectives |
|
IPF: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, ILD: Interstitial lung disease
Acknowledgement:
The authors would like to thank Marie Nguyen for her assistance with manuscript preparation and submission.
Funding and Disclosures of potential conflict of interest:
J. A. Poole is funded by grants through the Department of Defense (PR200793) and National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (R01OH012045). JAP has received research regents (anti-IL-33/ST2 blocking antibody reagent, no monies) from AstraZeneca and is site recruiter (no monies) for clinical industry studies for asthma, sinus disease, and urticaria (GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, CellDex Therapeutics).
S. Quirce has received speaking and consulting honoraria from ALK, Allergy Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GSK, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva.
J.L. Zamora-Sifuentes has no conflicts of interests to declare.
L. de las Vecillas has no conflicts of interest to declare related to this work.
Abbreviations:
- AHR
Airway hyperresponsiveness
- BALF
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
- COPD
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- CI
Confidence interval
- FEV1
Forced expiratory volume in one second
- FVC
Forced volume capacity
- FeNO
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide
- HP
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis
- IPF
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- IL
Interleukin
- ILC
Innate lymphoid cells
- LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
- MyD88
Myeloid differentiation factor 88
- OR
Odds ratio
- aOR
adjust odds ratio
- ODTS
Organic dust toxic syndrome
- PPE
Personal protective equipment
- TLR
Toll-like receptor
- TNF
Tumor necrosis factor
- U.S.
United States
- WRA
Work-related asthma
Footnotes
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, or the United States government.
REFERENCES
- 1.Després V, Huffman JA, Burrows SM, Hoose C, Safatov A, Buryak G, et al. Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review. Tellus Series B, Chemical and physical meteorology. 2012;64(1):15598. [Google Scholar]
- 2.da Paz ER, de Lima CMF, Felix SN, Schaeffer B, Galvao CES, Correia AT, et al. Airway inflammatory profile among cleaning workers from different workplaces. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seidel J, Magzamen S, Wang YH, Neujahr V, Schaeffer JW. Lessons from Dairy Farmers for Occupational Allergy and Respiratory Disease. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2023;23(6):325–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guillam MT, Martin S, Le Guelennec M, Puterflam J, Le Bouquin S, Huneau-Salaun A. Dust exposure and health of workers in duck hatcheries. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(3):360–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eduard W, Pearce N, Douwes J. Chronic bronchitis, COPD, and lung function in farmers: the role of biological agents. Chest. 2009;136(3):716–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guillien A, Soumagne T, Dalphin JC, Degano B. COPD, airflow limitation and chronic bronchitis in farmers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(1):58–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Poole CJM, Basu S. Systematic Review: Occupational illness in the waste and recycling sector. Occup Med (Lond). 2017;67(8):626–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hinson AV, Lokossou VK, Schlunssen V, Agodokpessi G, Sigsgaard T, Fayomi B. Cotton Dust Exposure and Respiratory Disorders among Textile Workers at a Textile Company in the Southern Part of Benin. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Neghab M, Jabari Z, Kargar Shouroki F. Functional disorders of the lung and symptoms of respiratory disease associated with occupational inhalation exposure to wood dust in Iran. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sauvé J-F, Locke SJ, Josse PR, Stapleton EM, Metwali N, Altmaier RW, et al. Characterization of inhalable endotoxin, glucan, and dust exposures in Iowa farmers. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2020;228:113525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Poole JA, Dooley GP, Saito R, Burrell AM, Bailey KL, Romberger DJ, et al. Muramic acid, endotoxin, 3-hydroxy fatty acids, and ergosterol content explain monocyte and epithelial cell inflammatory responses to agricultural dusts. Journal of toxicology and environmental healthPart A. 2010;73(10):684–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ferretti S, Bonneau O, Dubois GR, Jones CE, Trifilieff A. IL-17, produced by lymphocytes and neutrophils, is necessary for lipopolysaccharide-induced airway neutrophilia: IL-15 as a possible trigger. J Immunol. 2003;170(4):2106–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boots AW, Gerloff K, Bartholome R, van Berlo D, Ledermann K, Haenen GR, et al. Neutrophils augment LPS-mediated pro-inflammatory signaling in human lung epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(7):1151–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Savov JD, Gavett SH, Brass DM, Costa DL, Schwartz DA. Neutrophils play a critical role in development of LPS-induced airway disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;283(5):L952–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sundblad BM, von Scheele I, Palmberg L, Olsson M, Larsson K. Repeated exposure to organic material alters inflammatory and physiological airway responses. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(1):80–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Poole JA, Wyatt TA, Kielian T, Oldenburg P, Gleason AM, Bauer A, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 regulates organic dust-induced airway inflammation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45(4):711–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bailey KL, Poole JA, Mathisen TL, Wyatt TA, Von Essen SG, Romberger DJ. Toll-like receptor 2 is upregulated by hog confinement dust in an IL-6-dependent manner in the airway epithelium. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294(6):L1049–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bauer C, Kielian T, Wyatt TA, Romberger DJ, West WW, Gleason AM, Poole JA. Myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent signaling is critical for acute organic dust-induced airway inflammation in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013;48(6):781–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ren Y, Ichinose T, He M, Youshida S, Nishikawa M, Sun G. Co-exposure to lipopolysaccharide and desert dust causes exacerbation of ovalbumin-induced allergic lung inflammation in mice via TLR4/MyD88-dependent and -independent pathways. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019;15:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Charavaryamath C, Juneau V, Suri SS, Janardhan KS, Townsend H, Singh B. Role of Toll-like receptor 4 in lung inflammation following exposure to swine barn air. Exp Lung Res. 2008;34(1):19–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Casanova JL, Abel L, Quintana-Murci L. Human TLRs and IL-1Rs in host defense: natural insights from evolutionary, epidemiological, and clinical genetics. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:447–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Johnson AN, Dickinson J, Nelson A, Gaurav R, Kudrna K, Evans SE, et al. Effect of epithelial-specific MyD88 signaling pathway on airway inflammatory response to organic dust exposure. J Immunotoxicol. 2023;20(1):2148782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Johnson AN, Harkema JR, Nelson AJ, Dickinson JD, Kalil J, Duryee MJ, et al. MyD88 regulates a prolonged adaptation response to environmental dust exposure-induced lung disease. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hedelin AS, Sundblad BM, Sahlander K, Wilkinson K, Seisenbaeva G, Kessler V, et al. Comparing human respiratory adverse effects after acute exposure to particulate matter in conventional and particle-reduced swine building environments. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(10):648–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Arbour NC, Lorenz E, Schutte BC, Zabner J, Kline JN, Jones M, et al. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat Genet. 2000;25(2):187–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smith LM, Weissenburger-Moser LA, Heires AJ, Bailey KL, Romberger DJ, LeVan TD. Epistatic effect of TLR-1, −6 and −10 polymorphisms on organic dust-mediated cytokine response. Genes and immunity. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.LeVan TD, Von Essen S, Romberger DJ, Lambert GP, Martinez FD, Vasquez MM, Merchant JA. Polymorphisms in the CD14 gene associated with pulmonary function in farmers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(7):773–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Poole JA, Wyatt TA, Oldenburg PJ, Elliott MK, West WW, Sisson JH, et al. Intranasal organic dust exposure-induced airway adaptation response marked by persistent lung inflammation and pathology in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009;296(6):L1085–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Poole JA, Wyatt TA, Oldenburg PJ, Elliott MK, West WW, Sisson JH, et al. Intranasal Organic Dust Exposure-Induced Airway Adaptation Response Marked By Persistent Lung Inflammation and Pathology in Mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009;296(6):L1085–L95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barnes PJ. Inflammatory mechanisms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(1):16–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Keddache S, Laheurte C, Boullerot L, Laurent L, Dalphin JC, Adotevi O, Soumagne T. Inflammatory and immunological profile in COPD secondary to organic dust exposure. Clin Immunol. 2021;229:108798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yi S, Zhai J, Niu R, Zhu G, Wang M, Liu J, et al. Eosinophil recruitment is dynamically regulated by interplay among lung dendritic cell subsets after allergen challenge. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Poole JA, Gleason AM, Bauer C, West WW, Alexis N, Reynolds SJ, et al. alphabeta T cells and a mixed Th1/Th17 response are important in organic dust-induced airway disease. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology : Official Publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2012;109(4):266–73.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mannion JM, McLoughlin RM, Lalor SJ. The Airway Microbiome-IL-17 Axis: a Critical Regulator of Chronic Inflammatory Disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023;64(2):161–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Martonik D, Parfieniuk-Kowerda A, Rogalska M, Flisiak R. The Role of Th17 Response in COVID-19. Cells. 2021;10(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Korn A, Miller D, Dong L, Buckles EL, Wagner B, Ainsworth DM. Differential Gene Expression Profiles and Selected Cytokine Protein Analysis of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes of Horses with Chronic Recurrent Airway Obstruction (RAO) Support an Interleukin-17 Immune Response. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.LeVan TD, Romberger DJ, Siahpush M, Grimm BL, Ramos AK, Johansson PL, et al. Relationship of systemic IL-10 levels with proinflammatory cytokine responsiveness and lung function in agriculture workers. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wyatt TA, Nemecek M, Chandra D, DeVasure JM, Nelson AJ, Romberger DJ, Poole JA. Organic dust-induced lung injury and repair: Bi-directional regulation by TNFalpha and IL-10. J Immunotoxicol. 2020;17(1):153–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Poole JA, Gaurav R, Schwab A, Nelson AJ, Gleason A, Romberger DJ, Wyatt TA. Post-endotoxin exposure-induced lung inflammation and resolution consequences beneficially impacted by lung-delivered IL-10 therapy. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):17338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Durr UH, Sudheendra US, Ramamoorthy A. LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758(9):1408–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Golec M, Reichel C, Mackiewicz B, Skorska C, Curzytek K, Lemieszek M, et al. Cathelicidin LL-37, granzymes, TGF-beta1 and cytokines levels in induced sputum from farmers with and without COPD. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2009;16(2):289–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Uysal P, Simsek G, Durmus S, Sozer V, Aksan H, Yurt S, et al. Evaluation of plasma antimicrobial peptide LL-37 and nuclear factor-kappaB levels in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:321–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lagiso ZA, Mekonnen WT, Abaya SW, Takele AK, Workneh HM. Chronic respiratory symptoms, lung function and associated factors among flour mill factory workers in Hawassa city, southern Ethiopia: “comparative cross-sectional study”. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Andersson E, Sallsten G, Lohman S, Neitzel R, Toren K. Lung function and paper dust exposure among workers in a soft tissue paper mill. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93(1):105–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vested A, Basinas I, Burdorf A, Elholm G, Heederik DJJ, Jacobsen GH, et al. A nationwide follow-up study of occupational organic dust exposure and risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(2):105–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Veil-Picard M, Soumagne T, Vongthilath R, Annesi-Maesano I, Guillien A, Laurent L, et al. Is atopy a risk indicator of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in dairy farmers? Respir Res. 2019;20(1):124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carnes MU, Hoppin JA, Metwali N, Wyss AB, Hankinson JL, O’Connell EL, et al. House Dust Endotoxin Levels Are Associated with Adult Asthma in a U.S. Farming Population. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(3):324–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stein MM, Hrusch CL, Gozdz J, Igartua C, Pivniouk V, Murray SE, et al. Innate Immunity and Asthma Risk in Amish and Hutterite Farm Children. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):411–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Warren KJ, Dickinson JD, Nelson AJ, Wyatt TA, Romberger DJ, Poole JA. Ovalbumin-sensitized mice have altered airway inflammation to agriculture organic dust. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zejda JE, Hurst TS, Rhodes CS, Barber EM, McDuffie HH, Dosman JA. Respiratory health of swine producers. Focus on young workers. Chest. 1993;103(3):702–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Poole JA, Romberger DJ, Wyatt TA, Staab E, VanDeGraaff J, Thiele GM, et al. Age Impacts Pulmonary Inflammation and Systemic Bone Response to Inhaled Organic Dust Exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2015;78(19):1201–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ritchie H, Roser M. Micronutrient Deficiency. Our World in Data. 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Knoell DL, Smith DA, Sapkota M, Heires AJ, Hanson CK, Smith LM, et al. Insufficient zinc intake enhances lung inflammation in response to agricultural organic dust exposure. J Nutr Biochem. 2019;70:56–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Golden GA, Wyatt TA, Romberger DJ, Reiff D, McCaskill M, Bauer C, et al. Vitamin D treatment modulates organic dust-induced cellular and airway inflammatory consequences. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2013;27(1):77–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nordgren TM, Friemel TD, Heires AJ, Poole JA, Wyatt TA, Romberger DJ. The omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid attenuates organic dust-induced airway inflammation. Nutrients. 2014;6(12):5434–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Seifert SA, Von Essen S, Jacobitz K, Crouch R, Lintner CP. Organic dust toxic syndrome: a review. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(2):185–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.VE SG, A CI, S LM. Organic dust toxic syndrome: A noninfectious febrile illness after exposure to the hog barn environment. J Swine Health Prod. 2005;13(5):273–6. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rivoire B, Attucci S, Anthonioz P, Carre P, Lemarie E, Hazouard E. Occupational acute lung injury due to Alternaria alternata: early stage of organic dust toxic syndrome requires no corticosteroids. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(7):1236–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wunschel J, Poole JA. Occupational agriculture organic dust exposure and its relationship to asthma and airway inflammation in adults. J Asthma. 2016;53(5):471–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang Y, Ye B, Zheng H, Zhang W, Han L, Yuan P, Zhang C. Association Between Organic Dust Exposure and Adult-Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2019;11(6):818–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kim JL, Henneberger PK, Lohman S, Olin AC, Dahlman-Hoglund A, Andersson E, et al. Impact of occupational exposures on exacerbation of asthma: a population-based asthma cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16(1):148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dangi BM, Bhise AR. Cotton dust exposure: Analysis of pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms. Lung India. 2017;34(2):144–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Berry G, McKerrow CB, Molyneux MK, Rossiter CE, Tombleson JB. A study of the acute and chronic changes in ventilatory capacity of workers in Lancashire cotton mills. Br J Ind Med. 1973;30(1):25–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Noweir MH, el-Sadek Y, el-Dakhakhny AA. Exposure to dust in the cottonseed oil extraction industry. Arch Environ Health. 1969;19(1):99–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.A Review of the Literature Relating to Affection of the Respiratory Tract in Individuals Exposed to Cotton Dust. [press release]. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1949. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schilling RS. Byssinosis in cotton and other textile workers. Lancet. 1956;271(6937):261–5; contd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schilling RS. Byssinosis in cotton and other textile workers. Lancet. 1956;271(6938):319–24; concl. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Von Essen S, Donham K. Illness and injury in animal confinement workers. Occup Med. 1999;14(2):337–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, Jorres R, Monso E, Opravil U, et al. Respiratory symptoms in European animal farmers. Eur Respir J. 2001;17(4):747–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Harries MG, Cromwell O. Occupational asthma caused by allergy to pigs’ urine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6319):867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Matson SC, Swanson MC, Reed CE, Yunginger JW. IgE and IgG-immune mechanisms do not mediate occupation-related respiratory or systemic symptoms in hog farmers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983;72(3):299–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bang KM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in nonsmokers by occupation and exposure: a brief review. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine. 2015;21(2):149–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Guillien A, Soumagne T, Dalphin J-C, Degano B. COPD, airflow limitation and chronic bronchitis in farmers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2019;76(1):58–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Eduard W, Pearce N, Douwes J. Chronic bronchitis, COPD, and lung function in farmers: the role of biological agents. Chest. 2009;136(3):716–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sikkeland LIB, Eduard W, Skogstad M, Alexis NE, Kongerud J. Recovery from workplace-induced airway inflammation 1 year after cessation of exposure. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(10):721–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jouneau S, Marette S, Robert A-M, Gouyet T, Guillot S, Chapron A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in dairy farmers: AIRBAg study. Environmental research. 2019;169:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Marescaux A, Degano B, Soumagne T, Thaon I, Laplante JJ, Dalphin JC. Impact of farm modernity on the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in dairy farmers. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2016;73(2):127–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Viegas S, Faísca VM, Dias H, Clérigo A, Carolino E, Viegas C. Occupational exposure to poultry dust and effects on the respiratory system in workers. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A. 2013;76(4–5):230–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Er M, Emri SA, Demir AU, Thorne PS, Karakoca Y, Bilir N, Baris IY. Byssinosis and COPD rates among factory workers manufacturing hemp and jute. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016;29(1):55–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.GINA GOLD. Diagnosis of Diseases of Chronic Airflow Limitation: Asthma, COPD, and Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS). 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sin DD, Miravitlles M, Mannino DM, Soriano JB, Price D, Celli BR, et al. What is asthma-COPD overlap syndrome? Towards a consensus definition from a round table discussion. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(3):664–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Christenson SA, Steiling K, van den Berge M, Hijazi K, Hiemstra PS, Postma DS, et al. Asthma-COPD overlap. Clinical relevance of genomic signatures of type 2 inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(7):758–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dodd KE, Mazurek JM. Prevalence of COPD among workers with work-related asthma. J Asthma. 2020;57(11):1179–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ojanguren I, Moullec G, Hobeika J, Miravitlles M, Lemiere C. Clinical and inflammatory characteristics of Asthma-COPD overlap in workers with occupational asthma. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jaakkola MS, Lajunen TK, Jaakkola JJK. Indoor mold odor in the workplace increases the risk of Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome: a population-based incident case-control study. Clin Transl Allergy. 2020;10:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tommola M, Ilmarinen P, Tuomisto LE, Lehtimaki L, Kankaanranta H. Occupational exposures and asthma-COPD overlap in a clinical cohort of adult-onset asthma. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Quirce S, Vandenplas O, Campo P, Cruz MJ, de Blay F, Koschel D, et al. Occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis: an EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2016;71(6):765–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kongsupon N, Walters GI, Sadhra SS. Occupational causes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a systematic review and compendium. Occup Med (Lond). 2021;71(6–7):255–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, Myers JL, Kreuter M, Vasakova M, et al. Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):e36–e69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Walters GI. Occupational exposures and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;20(2):103–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Trethewey SP, Walters GI. The Role of Occupational and Environmental Exposures in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Narrative Literature Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2018;54(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Blanc PD, Annesi-Maesano I, Balmes JR, Cummings KJ, Fishwick D, Miedinger D, et al. The Occupational Burden of Nonmalignant Respiratory Diseases. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(11):1312–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Baumgartner KB, Samet JM, Coultas DB, Stidley CA, Hunt WC, Colby TV, Waldron JA. Occupational and environmental risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter case-control study. Collaborating Centers. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(4):307–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Awadalla NJ, Hegazy A, Elmetwally RA, Wahby I. Occupational and environmental risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Egypt: a multicenter case-control study. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2012;3(3):107–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Paolocci G, Folletti I, Toren K, Ekstrom M, Dell’Omo M, Muzi G, Murgia N. Occupational risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Southern Europe: a case-control study. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Morell F, Villar A, Montero MA, Munoz X, Colby TV, Pipvath S, et al. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective case-cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(9):685–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.De Sadeleer LJ, Verleden SE, De Dycker E, Yserbyt J, Verschakelen JA, Verbeken EK, et al. Clinical behaviour of patients exposed to organic dust and diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2018;23(12):1160–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kim Y, Park TS, Kim TH, Rhee CK, Kim C, Lee JS, et al. Impact of Previous Occupational Exposure on Outcomes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Poole JA, Quirce S, Siracusa A, Cruz Carmona MJ, Johnson AN, Malo JL, Bernstein DI. Airway Diseases Due to Organic Dust Exposure. In: Susan MT, Vandenplas O, Bernstein DI, Malo JL, editors. Asthma in the Workplace. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2021. p. 293–302. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zejda JE, Hurst TS, Rhodes CS, Barber EM, McDuffie HH, Dosman JA. Respiratory health of swine producers. Focus on young workers. Chest. 1993;103(3):702–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Senthilselvan A, Dosman JA, Kirychuk SP, Barber EM, Rhodes CS, Zhang Y, Hurst TS. Accelerated lung function decline in swine confinement workers. Chest. 1997;111(6):1733–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Chan-Yeung M, Bernstein IL. Airway diseases due to organic dust exposure. In: Bernstein IL, Malo JL, editors. Asthma in the Workplace. 4th ed. London: CRC Press; 2013. p. 357. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Imbus HR, Suh MW. Byssinosis: a study of 10,133 textile workers. Arch Environ Health. 1973;26(4):183–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Schwartz DA, Landas SK, Lassise DL, Burmeister LF, Hunninghake GW, Merchant JA. Airway injury in swine confinement workers. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116(8):630–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kirychuk S, Senthilselvan A, Dosman JA, Zhou C, Barber EM, Rhodes CS, Hurst TS. Predictors of longitudinal changes in pulmonary function among swine confinement workers. Can Respir J. 1998;5(6):472–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Cooper JAJ. Occupational asthma, byssinosis, and industrial bronchitis. Fishman’s pulmonary diseases and disorder. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 915–24. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, Myers JL, Kreuter M, Vasakova M, et al. Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(3):e36–e69. Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(1):150–151. Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med.2;206(4):518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Sundblad BM, Larsson BM, Palmberg L, Larsson K. Exhaled nitric oxide and bronchial responsiveness in healthy subjects exposed to organic dust. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(2):426–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Safaei S, Nodoushan MS, Jahromi MT. Across-shift changes of exhaled nitric oxide and spirometric indices among cotton textile workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014;27(5):707–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Lipinska-Ojrzanowska A, Marcinkiewicz A, Walusiak-Skorupa J. Usefulness of Biomarkers in Work-Related Airway Disease. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2017;4(2):181–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Quirce S, Diaz-Perales A. Diagnosis and management of grain-induced asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2013;5(6):348–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Park HS, Nahm DH, Kim HY, Suh CH, Kim KS. Role of specific IgE, IgG and IgG4 antibodies to corn dust in exposed workers. Korean J Intern Med. 1998;13(2):88–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Chan-Yeung M, Wong R, MacLean L. Respiratory abnormalities among grain elevator workers. Chest. 1979;75(4):461–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Warren CP, Holford-Strevens V, Sinha RN. Sensitization in a grain handler to the storage mite Lepidoglyphus destructor (Schrank). Ann Allergy. 1983;50(1):30–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Larsson KA, Eklund AG, Hansson LO, Isaksson BM, Malmberg PO. Swine dust causes intense airways inflammation in healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(4):973–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Larsson K, Eklund A, Malmberg P, Belin L. Alterations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid but not in lung function and bronchial responsiveness in swine confinement workers. Chest. 1992;101(3):767–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Poole JA, Romberger DJ. Immunological and inflammatory responses to organic dust in agriculture. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;12(2):126–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hoffmann HJ, Iversen M, Sigsgaard T, Omland O, Takai H, Bonefeld-Jorgensen E, et al. A single exposure to organic dust of non-naive non-exposed volunteers induces long-lasting symptoms of endotoxin tolerance. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005;138(2):121–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Ivanov S, Palmberg L, Venge P, Larsson K, Linden A. Interleukin-17A mRNA and protein expression within cells from the human bronchoalveolar space after exposure to organic dust. Respir Res. 2005;6(1):44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pedersen B, Iversen M, Bundgaard Larsen B, Dahl R. Pig farmers have signs of bronchial inflammation and increased numbers of lymphocytes and neutrophils in BAL fluid. The European respiratory journal : official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology. 1996;9(3):524–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jagielo PJ, Thorne PS, Watt JL, Frees KL, Quinn TJ, Schwartz DA. Grain dust and endotoxin inhalation challenges produce similar inflammatory responses in normal subjects. Chest. 1996;110(1):263–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Von Essen SG, O’Neill DP, McGranaghan S, Olenchock SA, Rennard SI. Neutrophilic respiratory tract inflammation and peripheral blood neutrophilia after grain sorghum dust extract challenge. Chest. 1995;108(5):1425–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.doPico GA, Jacobs S, Flaherty D, Rankin J. Pulmonary reaction to durum wheat; a constituent of grain dust. Chest. 1982;81(1):55–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Clapp WD, Thorne PS, Frees KL, Zhang X, Lux CR, Schwartz DA. The effects of inhalation of grain dust extract and endotoxin on upper and lower airways. Chest. 1993;104(3):825–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Gauvreau GM, Davis BE, Scadding G, Boulet LP, Bjermer L, Chaker A, et al. Allergen provocation tests in respiratory research: building on 50 years of experience. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Satija B, Kumar S, Ojha UC, Gothi D. Spectrum of high-resolution computed tomography imaging in occupational lung disease. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23(4):287–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Matyga AW, Chelala L, Chung JH. Occupational Lung Diseases: Spectrum of Common Imaging Manifestations. Korean J Radiol. 2023;24(8):795–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Mansouri F, Pili JP, Abbasi A, Soltani M, Izadi N. Respiratory problems among cotton textile workers. Lung India. 2016;33(2):163–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Saha A, Das A, Chattopadhyay BP, Alam J, Dasgupta TK. A Comparative Study of Byssinosis in Jute Industries. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2018;22(3):170–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Sundblad BM, Sahlander K, Ek A, Kumlin M, Olsson M, Larsson K, Palmberg L. Effect of respirators equipped with particle or particle-and-gas filters during exposure in a pig confinement building. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(2):145–53. Erratum in: Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007 Apr;33(2):160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Olivieri M, Biscardo CA, Turri S, Perbellini L. Omalizumab in persistent severe bakers’ asthma. Allergy. 2008;63(6):790–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Lavaud F, Bonniaud P, Dalphin JC, Leroyer C, Muller D, Tannous R, et al. Usefulness of omalizumab in ten patients with severe occupational asthma. Allergy. 2013;68(6):813–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Quirce S, Sastre J. Occupational asthma: clinical phenotypes, biomarkers, and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2019;25(1):59–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Olle-Monge M, Cruz MJ, Gomez-Olles S, Ojanguren I, Vanoirbeek J, Munoz X. Effect of anti-IgE in occupational asthma caused by exposure to low molecular weight agents. Allergy. 2017;72(11):1720–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Miralles-Lopez JC, Antolin-Amerigo D, Garcia-Moguel I, Dominguez-Ortega J, Delgado-Romero J, Quirce S. Positioning of Tezepelumab in severe asthma. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2023:0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Selvarajah B, Plate M, Chambers RC. Pulmonary fibrosis: Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Mol Aspects Med. 2023;94:101227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Sigsgaard T, Basinas I, Doekes G, de Blay F, Folletti I, Heederik D, et al. Respiratory diseases and allergy in farmers working with livestock: a EAACI position paper. Clin Transl Allergy. 2020;10:29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Daba Wami S, Chercos DH, Dessie A, Gizaw Z, Getachew A, Hambisa T, et al. Cotton dust exposure and self-reported respiratory symptoms among textile factory workers in Northwest Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018;13:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Sousan S, Anthony TR, Altmaier R, Gibbs J, Nonnenmann M. Use of prototype side stream filtration system to control dust levels in a commercial swine farrowing building. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2023:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
