Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;89(3):931–953. doi: 10.1177/00302228221085191

Table 2.

Quantitative Analysis Results.

MAiD (n = 25) NDPC (n = 35) Comparison between the groups (ANCOVA)
Measure Scale Range a M (SD) Range M (SD) Range Diff F Sign Effect Size
PG-13 (continuous score) b 11.00–55.00 22.52 (6.90) 12.00–38.00 22.11 (8.14) 11.00–43.00 0.41 0.215 0.645 0.004
RGEI – global score 22.00–132.00 57.52 (24.27) 22.00–104.00 56.40 (24.32) 22.00–104.00 1.12 0.534 0.468 0.009
Physical distress 7.00–42.00 16.32 (7.80) 7.00–30.00 15.74 (7.20) 7.00–32.00 0.58 0.992 0.324 0.017
Existential tension 6.00–36.00 15.32 (7.72) 6.00–33.00 14.40 (7.70) 6.00–31.00 0.92 0.712 0.402 0.013
Guilt 3.00–18.00 6.56 (3.37) 3.00–14.00 7.37 (3.70) 3.00–15.00 −0.81 0.191 0.664 0.003
Depression 6.00–36.00 19.32 (8.12) 6.00–34.00 18.89 (8.13) 6.00–32.00 0.43 0.395 0.532 0.007

MAiD = Medical assistance in dying; NDPC = Natural death assisted by palliative care; RGEI = Revised grief experience inventory; PG-13 = Prolonged Grief-13; ANCOVA = Analysis of covariance.

aScale range refers to minimum and maximum scores. Higher scores on the PG-13 and RGEI global score indicate greater grief distress/intensity. Higher scores on the RGEI subscales indicate that these grief dimensions are more problematic for the individual.

bThe cut-off score for Prolonged Grief Disorder’s diagnosis proposed by Pohlkamp and colleagues (2018) is 35.