Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2021 Oct 5;34(10):2216–2226. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00253

Table 3:

Compounds in three chemical categories* as absolute number detected (percentage of total) percentages of total numbers of detected compounds, for three consecutive vaping intervals, in analyzed e-cig products.

Blu Lipid-like, % Condensed hydrocarbon-like, % Un-matched, %
E-Liquid 135 (6.3%) 383 (18%) 2123 (62%)
Aerosol 1 59 (3.5%) 296 (17%) 1687 (86%)
Aerosol 2 44 (2.9%) 258 (17%) 1532 (87%)
Aerosol 3 50 (3.4%) 242 (17%) 1450 (87%)
Juul
E-Liquid 71 (7.6%) 84 (9%) 927 (70%)
Aerosol 1 40 (4.0%) 115 (11%) 1001 (88%)
Aerosol 2 50 (5.2%) 96 (10%) 960 (85%)
Aerosol 3 40 (4.3%) 102 (11%) 938 (87%)
Mi-Salt (Smok)
E-Liquid 42 (5.5%) 61 (8%) 762 (73%)
Aerosol 1 39 (4.2%) 97 (11%) 913 (86%)
Aerosol 2 30 (3.6%) 91 (11%) 820 (86%)
Aerosol 3 35 (3.9%) 93 (10%) 896 (86%)
Vuse
E-Liquid 48 (5.5%) 98 (11%) 873 (69%)
Aerosol 1 35 (3.7%) 134 (14%) 944 (83%)
Aerosol 2 38 (4.2%) 131 (14%) 900 (84%)
Aerosol 3 36 (3.8%) 143 (15%) 931 (86%)
PG/VG Base
Pre-Vaped 127 (11.2%) 53 (5%) 1131 (62%)
Aerosol 1 145 (7.7%) 49 (3%) 1888 (79%)
*

Lipid-like and un-matched % are based on MSCC compound category criteria. Condensed hydrocarbon-like category was defined by the classical van Krevelen diagram criteria. Because four MSCC categories are not shown, row sums do not equal 100%. Refer to text for information about classification approaches.