Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 15;51(4):320–334. doi: 10.1159/000538550

Table 10.

Paired-sample area difference under the ROC curves – moderate/high risk cohort N = 65

Test result pair(s) AUC difference p value
VTId:VTIs versus AAo-DAo angle −0.18 <0.01
VTId:VTIs versus TAo-DAo angle −0.12 0.07
VTId:VTIs versus LVS −0.17 0.00
VTId:VTIs versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.13 0.22
VTId:VTIs versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.20 0.03
AAo-DAo angle versus TAo-DAo angle 0.06 0.16
AAo-DAo angle versus LVS 0.01 0.73
AAo-DAo angle versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.31 <0.01
AAo-DAo angle versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.38 <0.01
TAo-DAo angle versus LVS −0.06 0.22
TAo-DAo angle versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.25 0.01
TAo-DAo angle versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.32 <0.01
LVS versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.30 <0.01
LVS versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.37 <0.01
Combined mitral aortic Z-score versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.07 0.39

VTId:VTIs, velocity time interval diastolic to systolic ratio; AAo-DAo angle, ascending to descending aorta angle; TAo-DAo angle, transverse to descending aorta angle; LVS, left ventricular longitudinal strain; PFO, patent foramen ovale.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure