Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 15;51(4):320–334. doi: 10.1159/000538550

Table 6.

Paired-sample area difference under the ROC curves – entire cohort (N = 110)

Test result pair(s) AUC difference p value
VTId:VTIs versus AAo-DAo angle −0.21 <0.01
VTId:VTIs versus TAo-DAo angle −0.17 0.01
VTId:VTIs versus LVS −0.21 <0.01
VTId:VTIs versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.09 0.33
VTId:VTIs versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.14 0.08
AAo-DAo angle versus TAo-DAo angle 0.05 0.17
AAo-DAo angle versus LVS 0.01 0.80
AAo-DAo angle versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.30 <0.01
AAo-DAo angle versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.35 <0.01
TAo-DAo angle versus LVS −0.04 0.28
TAo-DAo angle versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.26 <0.01
TAo-DAo angle versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.31 <0.01
LVS versus combined mitral aortic Z-score 0.30 <0.01
LVS versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.35 <0.01
Combined mitral aortic Z-score versus PFO or aortic arch flow reversal 0.05 0.46

VTId:VTIs, velocity time interval diastolic to systolic ratio; AAo-DAo angle, ascending to descending aorta angle; TAo-DAo angle, transverse to descending aorta angle; LVS, left ventricular longitudinal strain; PFO, patent foramen ovale.