| 1. I prefer virtual slide to the glass slide |
2.43±1.1 |
| 2. The quality of the image of virtual slides is better than glass slide |
2.52±1.0 |
| 3. The identification of cells and structures in virtual slide is better than glass slide |
2.60±0.9 |
| 4. Navigation with virtual slide viewer is easier than with glass slide |
2.64±0.9 |
| 5. Virtual slide is easy to use and effective for the practical session. |
2.65±0.9 |
| 6. I liked the possibility to access the images anywhere and at any time |
2.94±0.9
|
| 7. I can quickly access virtual slides from any devise |
2.81±0.9 |
| 8. Virtual slide permits learning in less time |
2.76±0.8 |
| 9. I succeeded in covering session ILOs through using virtual slide |
2.48±0.9 |
| 10. Virtual slide improve my learning |
2.65±0.8 |
| 11. I recommend using virtual slide session in my upcoming practical pathology lesson |
2.66±0.9 |
| 12. Virtual slide only is optimal for pathology learning |
2.25±0.9 |
| 13. Virtual slide can improve student’s interactions and improve the interaction with the teachers when compared with glass slide |
2.41±1.0 |
