Table 2.
Comparison results of algorithms in terms of accuracy, Fitness, and the number of selected features.
| BLOEO | GOW | HHO | DE | SSA | SCA | Measures | Datasets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.958 | 0.943 | 0.942 | 0.939 | 0.922 | 0.942 | Accuracy | NSL-KDD |
| 0.042 | 0.057 | 0.058 | 0.061 | 0.078 | 0.058 | Fitness | |
| 14.3 | 19.6 | 16.4 | 17.2 | 18.5 | 14.7 | # Features | |
| 0.945 | 0.896 | 0.889 | 0.903 | 0.863 | 0.891 | Accuracy | CICIDS2017 |
| 0.055 | 0.104 | 0.111 | 0.097 | 0.137 | 0.109 | Fitness | |
| 18.4 | 23.5 | 24.7 | 27.9 | 25.5 | 24.1 | # Features | |
| 0.976 | 0.912 | 0.931 | 0.880 | 0.882 | 0.925 | Accuracy | UNSW-NB15 |
| 0.024 | 0.088 | 0.069 | 0.120 | 0.118 | 0.075 | Fitness | |
| 10.8 | 13 | 11.7 | 14.6 | 18.8 | 12.6 | # Features |