Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Jul 16;10(15):e34673. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34673

A narrative review on application of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in endodontics

Roohollah Sharifi a,b, Ahmad Vatani c, Amir Sabzi a, Mohsen Safaei a,d,
PMCID: PMC11320137  PMID: 39145007

Abstract

The distinct physicochemical and biological characteristics of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles have attracted considerable interest in various branches of dentistry as potential solutions to the problems associated with conventional dental treatments and to promote human health. Many scientists have been interested in nanoparticles for endodontic applications in the last several decades. Endodontic treatment is more likely to be successful when metal and metal oxide nanoparticles are used. Endodontic therapies often make use of nanoparticles made of metals and metal oxides. The effect of nano metals and metal oxide in endodontic treatments has not been published or is not widely available in the literature. Therefore, this paper aims to review recent studies on the development and application of some important metal and metal oxide nanoparticles such as silver and silver oxide, zinc oxide, zirconium oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium dioxide and other metal oxide nanoparticles in endodontic therapeutic procedures.

Keywords: Metal nanoparticles, Metal oxide nanoparticles, Dentistry, Endodontics, Human health

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology is recognized as a cutting-edge technology due to its rapid advancements [1]. Nanoparticles are central to nanotechnology, exhibiting distinct chemical, physical, mechanical, biological, thermal, and electrical properties that differ from those of their bulk counterparts [2,3]. The reduction in particle size to the nanoscale can also lead to remarkable magnetic and optical properties [4,5]. One way to classify nanoparticles is by their nanosystem, which might be metallic, bimetallic, metal oxide, or magnetic [2,6]. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles are the most common and are valued for their exceptional properties in various fields, including medicine and biology [7]. The synthesis of metallic nanoparticles typically involves metal salts, and their visible properties are influenced by surface characteristics (size, shape, and morphology) and physicochemical properties, making the choice of synthesis method critical [4]. Various methods can be used to prepare these nanoparticles, including green synthesis, conventional chemical and physical methods such as vapor deposition, thermal precipitation, photodeposition, sputtering, and pulsed electrodeposition [8,9]. These synthesized nanoparticles manifest enormous properties, namely great antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity, high stability, easy preparation processes, simple incorporation, and functionalization by various molecules [7]. Au, Ag, iron, Mg, Al, Ti, Pd, Pt, Cu, Al2O3, ZnO, TiO2, CuO, In2O3, Co3O4, MgO, ZrO2, SiO2, Cr2O3, Ni2O3, Mn2O3, and CoO, are the most widely used ones because of providing distinct properties [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. Using metal and metal oxide nanoparticles has great potential in medicine and dentistry. They can be embedded into dental materials to improve properties [14]. The aim of this overview is a general review of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in endodontics.

2. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in medicine

Nanoparticles made of metals or metal oxides are now essential in many areas of biomedicine, such as imaging, medication delivery, prostheses and implants, and diagnostic systems [15]. Beyond these uses, metal and metal oxide nanoparticles are utilized as antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-angiogenic agents [3]. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles have been approved for clinical diagnosis and treatment, and they exhibit great promise in research advancement in diagnostic or therapeutic abilities (Schematic 1) [6].

Schematic 1.

Schematic 1

Biomedical application of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles.

2.1. Diagnostic application

Recent years have seen tremendous advancements in the biomedical use of nanoparticles made of metals and metal oxides for diagnostic purposes, including molecular imaging and cancer diagnostics [7]. Modern diagnostic imaging tools often use metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, such as MRI and fluorescent-labeled particles [7]. One of the most essential uses of nanoparticles in medicine is as contrast agents in bio-imaging procedures like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography [16]. There has been much interest in the diagnostic potential of manipulating magnetic metal oxide nanoparticles using an external magnetic field since it is a novel approach to remotely controlling their position [17,18].

2.2. Therapeutic application

Several therapeutic applications are possible owing to the metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, including drug delivery, drug release control, hyperthermia, and anti-infection therapy [16]. The therapeutic field has the potential to benefit significantly from metal and metal oxide nanoparticles due to their ability to form nanocarrier structures that have high delivery efficiency, sustained and targeted delivery of multiple therapeutic agents, excellent pharmacological activity, good stability, and bioavailability [7]. To lessen the medication's overall dosage and, by extension, its negative effects, metal oxide nanoparticles can be used for targeted drug delivery [7]. Nanoparticles can effectively increase the drug delivered at the target tissue and tumor site [16].

Several studies showed that some metal oxide nanoparticles have been mostly used due to their great magnetic behavior [9,19]. Magnetic nanoparticles can be applied in hyperthermia therapy [17]. Magnetic hyperthermia, a promising cancer treatment option, aims to raise the temperature to the point where tumor cells die [16,17]. Recently, there have been many studies on hyperthermia therapeutics, all of which have revealed that many different optimized magnetic nanoparticles are helpful for magnetic hyperthermia treatment [6,17].

Nanoparticles can provide effective and broad-range neutralization against viral infection [20]. Most of the metal oxides NPs such as TiO2, MgO, Zinc oxide, CuO, Al2O3, ZrO2, Co3O4, In2O3, Cr2O3, SiO2, Ni2O3, and Mn2O3 NPs could kill bacterial cells [10,21]. Metal oxide NPs have shown promising antibacterial properties in multiple investigations [20].

3. Synthesizes of metal and metal oxide

Physiochemical characteristics, size, shape, and morphology are all affected by nanoparticle synthesis [19,22]. Nanoparticle production uses various techniques, the most common of which fall into one of three broad categories: physical, chemical, or biological (Schematic 2) [19,22]. These methods can prepare different nanoparticles with various sizes and morphologies [15]. Physical synthesis methods are commonly used to synthesize highly pure and ultra-thin nanostructures and nano-alloys [19]. The chemical synthesis of ions through a succession of reactions is the conventional way of producing nanoparticles and has been used to synthesize several nanoparticles [19]. New approaches to biological synthesis have recently evolved, addressing the issues of reaction complexity, high cost, and safety that have plagued traditional methods [4]. One appropriate synthesis process can be chosen for the manufacture of nanoparticles, depending on the desired nanoparticle qualities [4,19].

Schematic 2.

Schematic 2

Methods of nanoparticle synthesis.

Two main ways to approach synthesis are top-down and bottom-up [23]. Synthesis of complex nanostructures from atoms and molecules is known as a bottom-up technique while downsizing bulk particles to create small nano-sized particles with various properties is known as a top-down approach [19]. Nanostructured metal and metal oxide materials were synthesized using different concepts and processes [24]. Nanoparticle production of metals and metal oxides is detailed here, along with some of the most critical steps in the process.

3.1. Chemical method

As part of the chemical synthesis process, a reaction mixture is gradually heated from room temperature to a high temperature [15]. The chemical properties of surfactants, precursors, and high-boiling solvents are crucial to this process [15]. The chemical synthesis approach [15,24] can create metal oxide nanoparticles. It is possible to chemically produce nanoparticles of many metal oxides, including Fe2O3, Fe3O4, zinc oxide, magnesium oxide, titanium dioxide, cadmium oxide, cenoxite, and vanadium oxide [24].

3.2. Sol-gel procedure

Traditional and widely used in industry, the sol-gel process can produce nano and microstructures of excellent quality [4]. Zinc oxide, MgO, TiO2, ZrO2, CuO, Al2O3, TiO2–SiO2, and SiO2–Al2O3 with aluminum oxide are all manufactured using this system [2]. This process includes the steps of crystallization, aging, condensation, and drying [2].

  • A)

    Hydrolysis, which involves combining solvents with metal alkoxide (MA) precursors

  • B)

    The removal of solvents (condensation) leads to the formation of a polymer network composed of metal oxide connections.

  • b)

    As the solution ages, it forms a gel-like network with liquid and solid components.

  • d)

    Gels that dry, with the hydroxyl groups on their surfaces removed (drying)

  • c)

    Pressing it into a solid ceramic form or crystallizing it into a crystalline substance

3.3. Co-precipitation technique

This process involves dissolving the salt precursor (metal salts such as nitrates or chlorides) in an aqueous solution and then converting it to metal hydroxide by adding ammonium or sodium hydroxide [24]. The resulting salt is washed, and the metal oxide nanoparticles are obtained by heating to remove hydroxides [15]. For example, the co-precipitation approach can produce Fe3O4, BiVO4, SnO2, Co3O4, NiO, and ZrO2 nanoparticles [24]. Low synthesis temperature, simplicity of processing and scaling up, low cost, and flexibility in modulating core and surface properties are some of the possible benefits of this approach [24].

3.4. Hydrothermal method

Hydrothermal methods allow for the creation of binary metal oxide nanoparticles, such as CuO, by reacting vapors from aqueous solutions with solid materials at high temperatures and vapor pressures, resulting in the deposition of microscopic particles [15].

3.5. Sonochemical method

Sonochemical synthesis involves preparing nanomaterials for a chemical reaction using high-intensity ultrasound sonication of metal salts in solution with oxygen [15]. The sonochemical preparation of nanoparticles of metal oxides, including CuO, ZnO, NiO, and MnO, is somewhat recent [24].

3.6. Laser ablation method

A process known as laser ablation uses the irradiation of colloidal solution targets dissolved in solvents to reduce particle size to the nanometer range [25]. A number of factors, including laser wavelength, pulse duration and energy, ablation time, laser fluency, and surfactant effects, determine the characteristics of the metal particles that are created [4]. Cu, CuO, Cu2O, ZrO2, ZnO, Fe3O4, NiO, Al2O3, SnO2, and Au–SnO2 have also been synthesized by the laser ablation method [24].

3.7. Biosynthesis methods

Many different types of metal oxide nanoparticles can be synthesized by nature in natural settings [24]. The low energy need of biological synthesis compared to its physicochemical alternatives has recently piqued much interest in producing metal oxide nanoparticles employing various plant extracts, fungi, and bacteria [20]. Compared to physical and chemical approaches, the inability to achieve nanoparticles of desirable size and shape with a low yield is the greatest obstacle in biological synthesis [24]. many metal and metal oxide nanoparticles such as Au, Ag, Fe3O4, CuO, ZnO, MgO, and TiO2 can be synthesized by biosynthesis [15].

3.8. Other methods

Depending on the properties of the metal/metal oxide nanoparticles required for application, many other synthetic strategies such as the electrochemical method, polyol method, wet chemical method, microwave method, physical vapor deposition method, solvothermal method, microemulsion method, and combustion method can be used [4,16,20,23]. Choosing the right synthesis method for creating metal oxide nanostructures significantly affects their size, toxicity, monodispersity, and stability, as mentioned before [24].

4. Properties of metal oxide nanoparticles

Due to their exceptional physical and chemical characteristics, metal oxide nanoparticles are promising candidates for use in various biomedical contexts [26]. Several factors significantly impact the characteristics of metal oxide nanoparticles, including their toxicity, magnetic and optical properties, antibacterial capabilities, porosity, crystallinity, concentration, pH, temperature, and pressure (10). Nanoparticles' antibacterial activity can be enhanced by subjecting them to high heat conditions, large surface area, and low pH [10].

The antibacterial activity is enhanced due to the tiny particles' increased contact with bacteria and their bigger surface area [27]. Variations in nanoparticle concentration, shape, porosity, and surface roughness can affect the surface area-to-volume ratio [10].

Numerous studies have shown that their form can affect nanoparticles' antibacterial activity [10]. By manipulating the solvents employed, the concentration of those solvents, the temperature and pH of the preparation environment, and the synthesis procedure, a variety of nanoparticle shapes, sizes, and configurations can be created [10]. Nanoparticles in higher concentrations indicate better antibacterial activity [10].

Evidence shows poorly soluble compounds might induce a reduced cytotoxic response [28]. Acidic pH enhances Zinc oxide NP solubility, which in turn improves their hazardous characteristics, as demonstrated by Saliani et al. [29]. The antibacterial action of nanoparticles is improved when the pH of the medium is decreased to an acidic range, which releases ions from the nanoparticles. Bacteria also have their amino acids and peptides augmented when the nanoparticles dissolve in their bodies [29]. Hence, each nanostructure with different production conditions has unique antibacterial and toxicity properties [30].

4.1. Antibacterial properties

The antibacterial properties of some metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, such as gold, silver, copper, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, magnesium oxide, iron oxide, and cerium oxide, show great potential against various microorganisms [3]. Since microbial pathogens are unable to build resistance to them, they are extremely effective against bacteria that have developed resistance to different kinds of antibiotics [15]. Metal oxides can have antibacterial effects in both bulk powder and nanoparticulate form; iron oxide, for example, is solely bactericidal in its nanoparticulate form [31].

An assortment of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including A. actinomycetemcomitans, C. jejuni, E. coli, S. aureus, S. mutans, S. salivarius, S. sanguis, and P. gingivalis, have been demonstrated to exhibit antimicrobial activity by metal oxide nanoparticles in several investigations conducted during the last twenty years [31]. There are two potential ways in which these substances kill bacteria: (i) when the metal oxide comes into touch with the bacterial cell wall, destroying it through an oxidation reaction, and (ii) by producing more reactive oxygen species (ROS), primarily hydroxyl radicals and superoxide ions [8].

Factors affecting metal oxide nanoparticles' antibacterial efficacy include their size, shape, crystal structure, distribution, agglomeration, synthesis parameters, pH, and zeta [28].

There was a significant improvement in the inhibition of bacterial growth by smaller, more surface-to-volume-ratio metal oxide nanoparticles when compared to larger ones [10,15]. The difference in antimicrobial efficiency based on the size of the nanoparticles is due to an electrochemical interaction between the nanoparticles and the cell walls [28]. The contact between metal oxide nanoparticles and bacterial membranes is enhanced by their zeta potential, leading to the breakdown of membranes and the loss of intracellular contents [15].

4.2. Toxicity properties

There have been serious concerns about the toxicity of nanomaterials with increasing nanomaterial production rates [19, 32]. Developing novel nanomaterials that provide low toxicity and high biomedical performance is essential to achieve more efficacious therapy [19]. The leading cause of toxicity is producing reactive oxygen species, which can lead to inflammation, oxidative stress, and DNA, cell membrane, and protein damage [33]. Particle size, shape, distribution, aggregation mode, charge, chemical makeup, morphology, surface area, chemistry, and intrinsic qualities are among the several factors that significantly impact the hazardous effects [5]. Hence, creating nanoparticles with little or no toxicity requires careful regulation of their physicochemical characteristics. The toxicity phenomenon is very complicated, and nanoparticles with the same physical condition and chemical composition show other toxicological behaviors [5].

Since nanoparticle toxicity is strongly proportional to their size, bigger nanoparticles are safer than smaller ones [1]. The electrostatic interaction between the positively charged nanoparticles and the negatively charged cell membrane makes them far more hazardous than their negatively charged counterparts [15].

It is believed that the different crystal structures of the same nanoparticles can show different toxicity [5]. For example, among the different crystal structures of TiO2, the rutile form has more toxicity, while the anatase form does not show considerable toxicity [5].

The general absence of toxicity in the bulk material leads most scientists to conclude that metal oxide nanoparticles are not harmful [34].

According to Dasai et al. the toxicity ranking in low-light settings was as follows: ZnO > CuO > Co3O4 > TiO2 [35]. It was also demonstrated that, when exposed to light, the toxicity was as follows: ZnO > CuO > TiO2 > Co3O4 [35].

5. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in endodontic treatment

Utilizing nanoparticles as innovative dental materials offers a solution to numerous issues linked to conventional methods of treating oral disorders, thanks to their unparalleled physicochemical and biological characteristics [36,37]. Dental cavities, periodontal disease, sensitivity to the teeth, and precancerous and malignant mouth diseases can all develop due to an oral infection [36].‏

Potentially more effective antibacterial and antibiofilm treatment techniques based on metal oxide nanoparticles might be implemented in the dental field [38]. In recent years, many researchers have examined metal oxide nanoparticles as a novel treatment modality in dentistry. These nanoparticles have shown great promise in light polymerization composite resins and bonding systems, bioceramics, endodontic sealers, and coating materials for dental implants. Additionally, they have demonstrated superior antibacterial efficacy against pathogens [39].

Research in endodontics has demonstrated that certain metal oxide nanoparticles can enhance antibacterial effectiveness, restore mechanical integrity to damaged dentin matrix, and promote tissue regeneration [38]. Bacterial biofilms cause primary and secondary root canal infections [40].

The treatment may not be successful when germs remain in the root canal system after an endodontic treatment [41]. Consequently, antimicrobial irrigation and mechanical instrumentation are essential for effective endodontic therapy [41]. A root canal irrigation protocol, along with root canal cleaning and shaping, is crucial for reducing the number of microorganisms in the canal. However, it is impossible to eliminate dental infections due to the polymicrobial nature of endodontic infections, which include actinomyces, enterococcus, streptococcus, peptostreptococcus, and countless more [42,43].

Improving the eradication of endodontic infections and treatment requires the employment of novel nanomaterials [44]. Endodontic irrigants, endodontic sealers, and intracanal medicaments utilizing various carriers have been developed over the past ten years, employing multiple metal and metal oxide antibacterial nanoparticles [42]. Schematic 3 displays a selection of the crucial metal oxides utilized in endodontic treatment. There has been much interest in using nanoparticles to improve the mechanical characteristics and antibacterial capabilities of materials and in using these materials to regenerate sick tissue [45].

Schematic 3.

Schematic 3

Metal oxide nanoparticles in endodontic treatment.

5.1. Zinc oxide nanoparticles

Root canal sealers made of zinc oxide nanoparticles are popular because they prevent pulp chamber and apical microbiome leakage and invasion [38,46,47]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles are also shown to exhibit antibiofilm activity against many strains, such as Enterococcus faecalis. According to Kishen et al. antibacterial nanoparticles such as zinc oxide, chitosan/zinc oxide, or chitosan-layer-zinc oxide significantly decreased E. faecalis adhesion [48]. Regarding primary endodontic infections, S. aureus is among the most commonly isolated species [49]. Kozuszko et al. [49] made it easier for zinc oxide nanoparticles and graphite-type carbon microparticles to fight S. aureus bacteria while being biocompatible. One area where zinc oxide nanoparticles showed promise was in regenerative endodontics [49]. Zinc oxide nanoparticles were potential material in the regenerative endodontic field [49].

Endodontic treatment makes use of a variety of root canal sealers [50]. Through intra-canal administration, zinc oxide nanoparticles combined with polyethylene glycol and either calcium hydroxide or neither exhibited antibacterial action against Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus [39]. Researchers Versiani et al. examined how adding zinc oxide nanoparticles to Grossman sealer changed its physicochemical characteristics. Grossman sealer's flowability, solubility, dimensional stability, and radiopacity were all enhanced, and the setting time was reduced when 25 % of the usual zinc oxide powder was substituted with zinc oxide nanoparticles [46]. Hadi et al. sought to determine whether endodontic sealers containing zinc oxide nanoparticles could inhibit the growth of Candida and E. faecalis [51]. Antibacterial activity against Candida and E. faecalis strains was very good at all concentrations of zinc oxide nanoparticles [51].

The concentration of zinc oxide nanoparticles determines their antibacterial impact; a larger concentration shows a greater bactericidal action [45].

Researchers found that adding zinc oxide nanoparticles to silymarin-mediated HAP increased its antibacterial efficacy against several oral infections [52]. The success or failure of endodontic treatment is heavily dependent on endodontic sealers [43]. A sealer made of zinc oxide and silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles was tested for its antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli [43]. Research has shown that different nanoparticles add different levels of antibacterial activity to sealer. For example, sealer mixed with silver nanoparticles had the most potent antibacterial effect, while sealer mixed with zinc oxide nanoparticles had the weakest [43]. The effectiveness of a sealer containing calcium hydroxide, chitosan nanoparticles, and zinc oxide nanoparticles in inhibiting the growth of two different strains of Escherichia coli was assessed by Nair et al. [53]. Calcium hydroxide sealers containing zinc oxide nanoparticles had a much lower optical density value than those containing chitosan nanoparticles. Regarding endodontic sealers, zinc oxide nanoparticles have better antibiofilm efficacy than chitosan nanoparticles against both E. faecalis strains [53]. According to some reports, endodontic infection removal may be aided by irrigants' chemical characteristics and concentration [54]. Novel nanoparticle solutions have been developed during endodontic therapy due to the restricted disinfection activity induced by regularly used root canal irrigants [55]. Researchers Kishan et al. tested the efficacy of irrigant solutions containing zinc oxide nanoparticles and sealers based on zinc oxide against E. faecalis biofilms that develop on root dentin [48]. The results showed that the presence of zinc oxide nanoparticles increased the antibacterial activity of the zinc oxide-based sealer and reduced bacterial adhesion to the dentine wall by 95 % [48]. Furthermore, Sridevi et al. [56] also found similar outcomes. Here, Shertha et al. assessed the efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles as an irrigant solution against both planktonic and biofilm forms of Escherichia coli. The authors saw a decrease in biofilm thickness.

Core root filling products made of gutta-percha cones are popular because they are biocompatible, inexpensive, have a long shelf life in the clinic, and may have antibacterial qualities [57,58]. After endodontically treated roots were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Jowkar et al. tested the fracture resistance of the treated roots using root canal irrigants consisting of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, zinc oxide nanoparticles, and silver nanoparticle solution [54]. Endodontically treated roots were more resistant to fracture after nanoparticle irrigation of the channels [54]. In addition, Almeida et al. showed that traditional endodontic irrigants, solutions with silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles, and other antibacterial agents were effective against the root canal biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis [55]. Comparable to traditional endodontic irrigants, they discovered that 1 % Ag and 26 % Zinc oxide nanoparticles effectively removed E. faecalis biofilm [55]. Using a rapidly dissolving nanofibrous film, Chachlioutaki et al. assessed the efficacy of intracanal coadministration of zinc oxide nanoparticles, an anti-inflammatory drug, and ketoprofen [59]. Among the most common microorganisms found in the root canal area, they demonstrated that nanofibrous film was efficient against E. faecalis. Among the most common microorganisms found in the root canal area, they showed that nanofibrous film was efficient against E. faecalis [59]. According to Wang et al. zinc oxide nanoparticles have low cell cytotoxicity in vitro and exhibit outstanding antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis and A. naeslundii [60].

The success of root canal therapy depends on using an endodontic sealer with appropriate mechanical qualities [61]. The results showed no discernible change in the mechanical properties of dental adhesives and composite resins after adding zinc oxide nanoparticles [62]. The push-out binding strength of fiber posts to root dentin utilizing resin cement was investigated and compared by Jowkar et al. when intraarticular dentin pretreatment with silver, zinc oxide, and titanium oxide nanoparticles was applied [62]. Regarding the fiber posts, there were no discernible variations in push-out bond strength between the zinc oxide and titanium oxide nanoparticles, and the silver nanoparticles demonstrated the highest values compared to the other two types of nanoparticles [62]. According to Eskandarinezhad et al. zinc oxide nanoparticles added to mineral trioxide aggregate did not reduce the aggregate's compressive strength, and these nanoparticles can be utilized to alter the aggregate's other characteristics as well [63]. According to the measurements taken by Elkateb et al. [64], the zinc oxide-based Pulp Canal Sealer was found to have a deeper tubular penetration when combined with nanoparticles of zinc oxide, Ag, and doped zinc oxide-Ag. Their results demonstrated that the flowing qualities of endodontic sealer materials were enhanced by nanoparticle addition, with Ag nanoparticles exhibiting the deepest penetration [65]. Grossman Sealer's physicochemical characteristics were studied by Versiani et al. who studied the addition of zinc oxide nanoparticles in varying concentrations [47]. Comparatively, sealers containing 25 % zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibited far lower solubility levels and dimensional alteration [46]. The research on the use of zinc oxide nanoparticles in endodontic treatment is summarized in Table 1. Even though zinc oxide nanoparticles are one of the most cutting-edge new dental materials, using them as a root canal sealant to eradicate infected microbes during endodontic treatment is still challenging.

Table 1.

Research reviews on the use of zinc oxide nanoparticles for endodontic.

Formulations NPs Applications Findings ref
a sealer made of zinc oxide that contains nanoparticles of both zinc oxide and silver Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles have recently come into the spotlight in endodontic therapy Although the difference was insignificant, silver nanoparticles had superior antibacterial activity to zinc oxide nanoparticles. [43]
Small carbon particles with a graphite-type structure and zinc oxide nanoparticles Antibacterial effect and biocompatibility of Zinc oxide nanoparticles and graphite-type carbon microparticles against S. aureus Nanoparticles of zinc oxide showed promise as a material for regenerative endodontics. [49]
Zinc oxide nanoparticles with endodontic sealers Antibacterial activity of combination zinc oxide nanoparticles with endodontic sealers against E. faecalis and Candida All concentrations of Zinc oxide nanoparticles showed perfect antibacterial activity on E. faecalis and Candida strains. [51]
Zinc oxide nanoparticles and silymarin-mediated HAP Striking out S. aureus, S. mutans, E. faecalis, and Candida albicans as antibacterial agents Silymarin-mediated HAP and zinc oxide nanoparticles had antimicrobial activity against oral pathogens. [52]
Silicone sealant with chitosan and zinc oxide nanoparticles Effectiveness of a sealer including calcium hydroxide, chitosan nanoparticles, and zinc oxide nanoparticles against biofilms The efficacy of a sealant including nanoparticles of zinc oxide, chitosan, and calcium hydroxide in the presence of biofilms [53]
zinc oxide, Silver, and titanium dioxide
nanoparticles
Endodontically treated root fracture resistance as a function of three different nanoparticle solutions administered as final root canal irrigants Endodontically treated roots had improved fracture resistance.
Among the tested substances, NaOCl had the lowest FR value.
[54]
Silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles Endodontic irrigants formulated with silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles exert antibacterial action against the E. faecalis biofilm in root canals. E. faecalis biofilm was effectively inhibited by 1 % Ag nanoparticles and 26 % ZnO nanoparticles. [55]
nanoparticles of zinc oxide and fluorinated graphene combined with a ZnO-based sealant The effectiveness of a sealer including zinc oxide, fluorinated graphene, and zinc oxide nanoparticles against microorganisms Compared to pure ZnO-based sealer, the antibacterial impact of sealer blended with various nanoparticles was significantly better. [56]
Nanofibrous film of zinc oxide nanoparticles and ketoprofen Investigate the feasibility of intracanal coadministration of zinc oxide nanoparticles, an antibacterial, and ketoprofen, an anti-inflammatory, using the rapidly dissolving nanofibrous film. The nanofibrous film was effective against E. faecalis, [59]
zinc oxide nanoparticles Zinc oxide nanoparticles' impact on cell function, biofilm formation, and antibacterial activity in an infected root canal Zinc oxide nanoparticles had excellent antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis and A. naeslundii and had low cell cytotoxicity in vitro [60]
Zinc oxide nanoparticles Find out how well zinc oxide nanoparticles kill all the microbes in a root canal system, including E. faecalis and candida. An increase in concentration increased bacterial sensitivity to zinc oxide nanoparticles. [66]

5.2. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles

Nanosized titanium dioxide particles are biocompatible, nontoxic, and highly stable, with suitable photocatalytic and antibacterial properties [67]. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles are increasingly used in endodontic and root canal therapy (68). Developing nanoparticles in endodontics aims to enhance mechanical characteristics and antibacterial activity [38].

Table 2 summarizes the research on root canal treatment with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. According to many investigations, titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhanced traditional glass ionomer cement's mechanical and bactericidal properties [68]. Elsaka et al. demonstrated that conventional glass ionomers exhibited enhanced fracture toughness, flexural strength, and compressive strength characteristics, in addition to enhanced antibacterial capabilities against S. mutans, when 3 % and 5 % (w/w) titanium dioxide nanoparticles were added to them [68]. However, their mechanical characteristics were drastically diminished when glass ionomers were combined with 7 % (w/w) titanium dioxide nanoparticles [68]. The compressive strength of the modified calcium silicate-based cement may not be affected by the addition of nano-scale titanium dioxide particles within a concentration range of 1 %–5 %, according to specific reports [69]. Given the high failure rate of endodontic treatments, restoring teeth that have undergone this procedure is a significant concern [70]. Sihivahanan et al. improved the mechanical properties of MultiCore Flow and everX Flow composite resin by incorporating 2.5 % titanium dioxide nanoparticles as a filler [70]. Mineral trioxide aggregates are used in many challenging endodontic procedures [71].

Table 2.

Review of research on titanium dioxide's use in endodontic.

Formulations NPs Applications Findings ref
Silver/Zinc oxide/and Titanium dioxide Test the fracture resistance of roots that have undergone endodontic treatment using three different nanoparticle solutions that are utilized as final irrigants in root canals. Endodontically treated roots were more resistant to breakage after final treatment with nanoparticles. [54]
Silver/Zinc oxide/Titanium oxide nanoparticles + resin cements Evaluate the push-out bond strength of fiber posts with silver/zinc oxide/titanium oxide nanoparticles Intraradicular dentin pretreatment with silver/zinc oxide/titanium oxide nanoparticles did not interfere with using fiber posts' push-out bond strength [63]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles + composite resin with everX Flow and MultiCore Flow Evaluation of the mechanical properties of composite resins using nanoparticles of titanium dioxide The mechanical characteristics of composite resin were enhanced when 2.5 % titanium dioxide nanoparticles were added. [70]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles + conventional glass-ionomer Evaluate the physical and antibacterial properties GI-containing 3 % (w/w) TiO2 nanoparticles improved mechanical and antibacterial properties [68]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles + calcium silicate-based cement Test the impact of adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles to modified cement made of calcium silicate on its compressive strength. Incorporating titanium dioxide nanoparticles in a concentration range of 1 %–5 % does not affect the improved calcium silicate-based cement's compressive strength. [69]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles +
mineral trioxide aggregate
Titanium dioxide nanoparticle biocompatibility testing with mineral trioxide aggregate The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles at a weight percentage of 1 wt% did not affect the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate. [71]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles + mineral trioxide aggregate Analyze the titanium dioxide nanoparticle-aggregated mineral trioxide's physical characteristics. Setting time, working time, compressive strength, and push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate were all enhanced by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles with a weight ratio of 1 %.
Silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles + mineral trioxide aggregate Analyzing the cytotoxic effects of aggregates of mineral trioxide with nanoparticles of titanium dioxide and silver Mixing silver or titanium dioxide nanoparticles with mineral trioxide aggregate can improve antibacterial activity. [72]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles + fiber-reinforced composite The strength of fiber micro-tensile bonds was assessed. Surface treated with nanoparticles of titanium dioxide Out of all the materials tested, the composite resin with 5 % titanium dioxide nanoparticles bonded the best to the fiber-reinforced composite post. [73]
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles Root canal walls treated with a 4 % titanium tetrafluoride solution were examined for their impact. walls Endodontics might benefit from this framework. [74]

Zinc, silver, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles have been added to mineral trioxide aggregate to enhance its characteristics [71]. Samiei et al. found that including titanium dioxide nanoparticles at a weight ratio of 1 % improved the mineral trioxide aggregate's compressive strength, push-out bond strength, setting time, and working time [75].

Samiei et al. explored the biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate with 1 wt% titanium dioxide nanoparticles with human gingival fibroblasts [71]. According to their findings, titanium dioxide nanoparticles added to mineral trioxide aggregate at a concentration of 1 wt percent did not compromise its biocompatibility [71]. Endodontically treated teeth lacking coronal structure are the most common candidates for fiber-reinforced composite post-placement [63]. Jowkar et al. [63], with the help of silver, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles, studied the influence of fiber posts on the push-out bond strength to root canal dentin. The group that used silver nanoparticles outperformed the others [63]. A similar result was obtained by Dsouza et al., they exhibited that the addition of titanium dioxide nanoparticles into mineral trioxide aggregate showed favorable cell viability and biocompatibility [72].

Fiber posts have several desirable qualities, making them an excellent choice for endodontically treated tooth restoration. These include resistance to corrosion, improved dentin bonding, and a reduced risk of vertical root fracture [73]. Sihivahanan et al. assessed the experimental dental composite resin's micro tensile bond strength using fiber posts filled with titanium dioxide nanoparticles [73]. Compared to other conventional composite resins, such as Multicore Flow, the experimental resin with 5 % titanium dioxide nanoparticles formed a stronger bind to the fiber-reinforced composite post [73].

According to Ramya and Rajaseka [76], titanium dioxide nanoparticles have shown promising antimicrobial and antifungal effects against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. They also showed promising antibacterial action against S. mutans and lactobacillus.

The root canal space can be effectively cleaned, and biofilms can be better removed using root canal irrigation solutions [54]. Endodontists have long relied on a variety of irrigation treatments, but a new, non-toxic option has emerged: titanium dioxide nanoparticles [54]. Researchers Jowkar et al. found that endodontically treated roots were more resistant to fracture when final root canal irrigants made of silver, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide nanoparticle solutions were utilized [54].

In endodontics, titanium dioxide nanoparticles improve mechanical properties and remineralization of the tooth structure. This is achieved by lowering biofilm formation, inhibiting demineralization, and counteracting the ever-growing microorganisms related to caries and endodontics.

5.3. Silver and silver oxide nanoparticles

Silver and silver oxide nanoparticles were used in various medical areas because of their broad antimicrobial activity and low toxic effects on cells and tissues [77,78]. According to Takamiya et al., silver nanoparticles showed no cytotoxic effects at 25 mg/mL or lower concentrations [77]. Numerous studies have illustrated the potency of silver and silver oxide nanoparticles in endodontic therapy (Table 3).

Table 3.

Summary of studies that evaluated the application of silver and silver oxide in endodontic.

Formulations NPs Applications Findings ref
Silver nanoparticles Evaluate the cytotoxicity of different types of silver nanoparticles Silver nanoparticles had no cytotoxic at 25 mg/mL or lower concentrations. [77]
Silver oxide with graphene oxide nanocomposite Evaluation of antibacterial activity They are promising antibacterial and antibiofilm agents [79]
Silver nanoparticle confined mesoporous structured bioactive powder. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticle against E. faecalis -Antibacterial activities depended on the confining of silver nanoparticle position
- In a root canal infection, they were effective against E. faecalis bacteria.
[80]
A combination of silver nanoparticles and a Nd-YAG laser TThe combination of silver nanoparticles with Nd-YAG lasers has a bactericidal effect against Enterococcus faecalis. The presence or absence of Nd: YAG laser irradiation did not affect the efficacy of silver nanoparticles in killing E. faecalis. [81]
Silver nanoparticles The Inhibitory action of silver nanoparticles on microorganisms in the root canal, necrosis The use of these nanoparticles as an endodontic irrigation agent or sealer successfully decreased inflammation in the root canal. [82]
Dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate + silver nanoparticles Evaluation of long-lasting antibiofilm effects of new root canal sealer Endodontic sealer demonstrated strong antibiofilm capabilities while retaining its physical and sealing characteristics. [83]
Chitosan and silver nanoparticles coated Gutta-percha Evaluation of antibacterial activity for endodontic applications Higher antibacterial potency for a higher increase in the success rate of root canal therapies was accompanied by a rise in antibacterial potency. [84]
Silver nanoparticles are synthesized on an aqueous graphene oxide matrix. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticles synthesized on an aqueous graphene oxide matrix Graphene oxide nanoparticles produced in water significantly decreased total biovolumes. [85]
Silver and gold nanoparticles Evaluation of the
En-face optical coherence tomography analysis of silver and gold nanoparticles as irrigating solutions used in endodontic treatment.
Because of their optical opacity, both nanoparticles are used as root canal irrigants. [86]
Silver nanoparticles Detection of genes related to resistance to silver nanoparticles in bacteria from secondary endodontic infections A high frequency of silCBA silver resistance genes (73.3 %) was attained. [87]
Silver oxide nanoparticles Evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements Both GICs had their surface roughness improved by adding nanofillers. [88]
Silver nanoparticles Assessing the antimicrobial efficacy of photodynamically activated silver nanoparticles in root canal infections As an auxiliary tool for root canal system disinfection, it shows promise. [89]

By interacting with oxygen, silver forms various phases, such as Ag2O, AgO, Ag2O3, and Ag3O4. In the past decade, Ag2O nanoparticles have been widely investigated as interesting materials owing to their unique properties [90]. Silver oxide nanoparticles were found to have good antimicrobial activity [78]. In their investigation, Sondi and Salopek-Sondi demonstrated that silver oxide nanoparticles effectively inhibited the growth of E. coli bacteria. A graphene oxide nanocomposite adorned with silver oxide exhibited remarkable antibacterial and antibiofilm properties, as shown by Khan et al. [79]. This material could potentially be employed to impede the proliferation of human bacterial pathogens linked to long-term illnesses. Researchers Vithiya et al. [90] examined how well silver oxide nanoparticles killed harmful germs. Regarding effectiveness against bacteria, they demonstrated that silver oxide nanoparticles are on par with silver nanoparticles [90,91].

One potential endodontic use for silver nanoparticles is disinfection, specifically, their use in root canal procedures to flush out bacteria and other debris [77]. To avoid infection or re-infection of the root canal space, several endodontic materials, such as cement, root canal sealers, and gutta-percha, have silver nanoparticles added to them [92]. Kung et al. assessed the antimicrobial efficacy of a bioactive powder containing silver nanoparticles in a mesoporous structure against E. faecalis, a bacteria that infects root canal systems [80]. They found that the antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles were location-dependent, with intermesopore confinement producing the best results against E. faecalis infections in root canals [80]. When tested against S. mutans, other studies found that silver nanoparticles were more efficient than chlorhexidine as an antibacterial agent [93]. Combining silver nanoparticles with a Nd: YAG laser demonstrated antimicrobial properties, effectively eliminating biofilms and resistant bacteria lodged deep within the dentinal tubules, which are inaccessible to traditional disinfection methods [81].

An endodontic sealer's antibacterial properties can help eliminate those pesky root canal germs [94]. In endodontics, silver nanoparticles were used as a sealer or irrigating agent to eradicate specific bacterial and fungal species, such as Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus aureus sp., Candida sp., Actinomyces sp., Actinobacillus sp., and Bacillus sp [94]. A novel root canal sealer was created by combining dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate with silver nanoparticles. Baras et al. [83] found that adding silver nanoparticles enhanced the biofilm-inhibition performance of the sealer. According to their findings, a sealer containing 0.15 % silver nanoparticles and 5 % dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate significantly improved microbial clearance, warding off additional endodontic infections and potential root canal system recontamination in the future [83].

Because of its biocompatibility, pliability, dimensional stability, radio-opacity, and ease of removal, gutta-percha has been extensively investigated in endodontics as a root canal filler material [95,84]. As an antibacterial agent against E. faecalis, S. aureus, C. albicans, and E. coli, gutta-percha coated with silver nanoparticles has been developed for root canal treatment [96,97]. Adding chitosan and Ag nanoparticles to Gutta-percha demonstrated significant antibacterial effectiveness against E. faecalis [84]. covering gutta-percha with Ag nanoparticles has greater antibacterial activity than covering it with chitosan nanoparticles, according to Mohan et al. [84].

In addition, mineral trioxide aggregate is one bioactive endodontic cement that can be enhanced with silver nanoparticles to make it more efficient against endodontic pathogens [98]. To improve the effectiveness of pulp-capping, apexification, and closing perforations in teeth, mineral trioxide aggregate containing silver nanoparticles can inhibit bacterial recolonization [98]. Researchers Bahador et al. found that adding silver nanoparticles to mineral trioxide aggregate increased its antibacterial activity against anaerobic periodontal/endodontic bacteria [99].

There have been many attempts to make root canal irrigants more effective against germs by adding antibacterial chemicals to them [100]. Ag nanoparticles are a great option for endodontic treatment for intracanal irrigation [98]. Here, Ioannidis et al. compared sterile saline, EDTA 17 %, CHX 2 %, NaOCl 1 %, and 2.5 % as root canal irrigants against endodontic biofilms, as well as the antibacterial and biofilm disruption capabilities of a nano silver-graphene oxide combination [85]. While the authors found that 2.5 % NaOCl killed more microbes than the control groups, Ag-graphene could be a good substitute for NaOCl in root canal irrigation [85]. Another study evaluated the bactericidal activity of low-concentration Ag nanoparticles with that of 5.25 % NaOCl as an irrigation solution against E. faecalis, and the results showed that both solutions had comparable efficacy [101]. In a study conducted by Charannya et al. the antimicrobial effects of various solutions were compared. The results showed that the combination of 15 μg/mL Ag nanoparticles and 2 % CHX solution had the strongest antimicrobial effect, along with 85 % saline (control), 5 % NaOCl, 1 % NaOCl, 1 % Ag nanoparticles, and 26 % Zinc oxide nanoparticles solutions [102]. Topala et al. [86] assessed the efficacy of endodontic irrigating solutions containing gold and Ag nanoparticles using en-face optical coherence tomography. Endodontic irrigating solutions containing gold and Ag nanoparticles were used to clean and shape the root canal, as reported in the paper [86].

Despite all this research, Orozco et al. [87] found that endodontic bacteria can develop a resistance to Ag nanoparticles over time. Few studies have investigated the potential of silver nanoparticles for the long-term removal of bacteria from endodontic biofilms [100]. Hence, research into the potential uses of silver nanoparticles in endodontics needs to be maintained [103].

5.4. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles

The antibacterial action of magnesium oxide nanoparticles makes them a promising antimicrobial agent for treating endodontic infections [39].

While investigating the inhibitory effects of calcium hydroxide on E. faecalis species, Yousefshahi et al. compared the effects of copper, silver, magnesium oxide, and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Copper nanoparticles exhibited the best antibacterial properties when combined with calcium hydroxide, and combining 1 % of nanoparticles greatly enhanced antibacterial properties [104]. Dental cement that had been treated with zein-coated magnesium oxide nanoparticles was tested by Naguib et al. [105] for their antibacterial capabilities against S. mutants, S. aureus, E. faecalis, and C. albicans. The specific initial cement substrate influenced the antibacterial characteristics of dental cement incorporating Zein-modified magnesium nanoparticles [105]. According to a research study by Wu et al. modified resin composites with magnesium nanoparticles exhibited great antibacterial activity against S. mutans [106]. Zhu et al. reported that the silver-magnesium oxide nanocomposite exhibited effective antibacterial activity against E. coli, compared to pure magnesium oxide nanoparticles and equivalent silver nanoparticles alone [107].

Because of its outstanding physicochemical qualities, AH Plus has become the sealer of choice for root canal treatment [108]. Sun et al. enhanced AH Plus sealer's mechanical and bioactive properties by incorporating magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles. Their results demonstrated that modified AH Plus samples, particularly those containing 3 % magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles, exhibited remarkable biocompatibility and osteogenic characteristics, suggesting a high potential for use in endodontics [108]. Research by Meng et al. on the antibacterial properties of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles and modified AH Plus sealer with these nanoparticles found that the latter exhibited better antimicrobial activity against S. mutans [109]. At the same time, the former could be used to eliminate residual bacteria and prevent reinfection. Using S. mutans and S. sobrinus as examples, Noori et al. showed that GIC with up to 1 wt percent MgO nanoparticles had great antibacterial action [110,111].

The antimicrobial properties of magnesium oxide nanoparticles in water were demonstrated to be [112]. To combat endodontic infections such as Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis, Monzavi et al. tested aqueous solutions of magnesium oxide nanoparticles at concentrations of 10 and 5 mg/L [113]. Magnesium oxide nanoparticle solutions (10 and 5 mg/L), 5.25 % NaOCl solutions, and 2 % CHX gluconate solutions did not differ significantly in their antibacterial efficacies against the endodontic pathogens studied [113]. But compared to NaOCl (5.25 %), magnesium oxide nanoparticles (5 mg/L) demonstrated statistically significant long-term efficacy in E. faecalis removal in the root canal system, suggesting that these nanoparticles may be a novel option for root canal irrigation [113]. According to another study, the endodontic pathogen E. faecalis was successfully eradicated in endodontic therapy using magnesium oxide nanoparticles as an irrigant solution [114]. Table 4 shows that there is currently a lack of research in this area; hence, more studies are necessary.

Table 4.

Review of research on the use of MgO nanoparticles in endodontic.

Formulations NPs Applications Findings ref
dental cements modified + magnesium oxide nanoparticles Evaluation of antimicrobial properties Magnesium oxide nanoparticle-containing dental cement showed significant antibacterial capabilities against Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus. [105]
Light-cured resin composite + magnesium oxide nanoparticles Evaluation of antimicrobial properties Nanoparticles of magnesium oxide added remarkable antimicrobial and wear-resistant properties to resin composites. [106]
AH plus + magnesium oxide nanoparticles Evaluation of bioactivity Magnesium oxide nanoparticles with an AH content of 3 % demonstrated excellent osteogenic and biocompatibility characteristics. [108]
Calcium hydroxide + silver, copper, zinc oxide, or magnesium oxide nanoparticles Evaluation of antibacterial properties The antibacterial capabilities are enhanced when 1 % of the nanoparticles are combined. [104]
Magnesium oxide nanoparticles Test the efficiency of magnesium oxide nanoparticles as an antibacterial agent against the endodontic pathogen Enterococcus faecalis. Endodontic treatment may soon use magnesium oxide nanoparticles as an alternate irrigating fluid. [114]
AH Plus sealer + Magnesium Hydroxide nanoparticles Evaluation of antibacterial activity The antibacterial action of AH Plus was improved, and the antimicrobial effects were long-lasting when magnesium oxide nanoparticles were added to the solution. [109]
Magnesium oxide nanoparticles Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy against endodontic pathogens Aqueous solutions of magnesium oxide nanoparticles show promise as an antibacterial agent with low toxicity. [113]

5.5. Zirconium oxide nanoparticles

Due to their unusual characteristics, nanoparticles of zirconium oxide, a chemical oxide, have recently attracted much attention in endodontics [67]. Table 5 reviews research on endodontic uses of zirconium oxide nanoparticles.

Table 5.

Research summaries on zirconium oxide nanoparticles from endodontic.

Formulations NPs Applications Findings ref
Epoxy resin mixed with Portland cement and niobium or zirconium oxide nano-and microparticles Determine whether experimental root canal sealers can bioactivate. Root canal sealers exhibited a degree of bioactivity [115]
Adding radio-opacifier micro- and nanoparticles of zirconium oxide or niobium oxide to Portland cement Evaluate the dentine-root canal sealer interface with two experimental sealers: one made of epoxy-based Portland cement and the other of epoxy resin, AH Plus. The sealers showed promise and were similar to the AH Plus sealer. [116]
Calcium phosphosilicate glass named + zirconium oxide nanoparticles Developing a modern bioactive glass-based root canal sealer Modern bioactive glass-based root canal sealer as a potential candidate for endodontic treatments [117]
Portland cement + zirconium oxide nanoparticles Evaluate the hydration chemistry and biocompatibility The in vitro biocompatibility of zirconium oxide nanoparticles with MG63 osteosarcoma cells was positively affected. [118]
Zirconium Oxide and Zinc Oxide
Nanoparticles + Calcium Silicate-Based Material
Evaluate the Physicochemical Properties and Antibiofilm
Activity
Although adding ZnO (at concentrations of 5 % or 10 %) considerably reduced the materials' compressive strength, it did not affect the antibiofilm action and gave Portland cement radiopacity. [119]
Portland cement is associated with micro- and nanoparticles of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide Evaluate the radiopacity, pH, and antimicrobial activity of -All materials showed antimicrobial activity against the evaluated microorganisms
- ZrO2 and Nb2O5 could be alternative radio-opacifiers to be added to calcium silicate materials
[120])
Nanoparticles and microparticles of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) + white Portland cement Examine the influence of zirconium oxide (ZrO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), microparticles (MPs), and nanoparticles (NPs) mixed with white Portland cement. White Portland cement containing ZnO and ZrO2 enhanced the activity of alkaline phosphatase and the release of calcium ions from human dental pulp stem cells. [121]
Zirconium oxide/polyacrylamide nanocomposite Evaluate the characterized effect of zirconium oxide/polyacrylamide nanocomposite as a sealer in root canal treatments. Root canal-filling solutions made of nanocomposite have much promise. The sealers were clinically suitable, with sufficient setting periods and flowability. [122]
Experimental endodontic sealers based on Portland cement modified with zirconium oxide and niobium oxide. Determine the experimental endodontic sealers' physicochemical and mechanical qualities using Portland cement-based zirconium oxide and niobium oxide modifications. We achieved satisfactory compressive strength and low solubility with the sealers. The setting times and flowability were suitable for clinical application. [123]
Pulp capping material based on sodium trimetaphosphate + containing zirconium oxide and solution containing either chitosan or titanium oxide nanoparticles Evaluate the mechanical, physicochemical, and antimicrobial properties One possible substitute for the pulp complex protector is the cement, which contains nano- or microparticles of zirconium oxide, titanium oxide, and sodium trimetaphosphate. [122]

Nanoparticles of zirconium oxide have impressive physicochemical and mechanical characteristics, including high toughness, strength, corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and low cytotoxic effects [67]. Viapiana et al. [123] examined the mechanical and physicochemical characteristics of endodontic sealers made of Portland cement that contained nanoparticles of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide. The results demonstrated that the sealers met the necessary criteria for clinical application, including low solubility, appropriate flowability, and compressive strength [123]. Zirconium oxide did not change the physicochemical characteristics of calcium silicate-based cement compared to microparticulate forms, according to Martelo et al. [124]. In their study, Gowri et al. demonstrated that zirconium oxide nanoparticles added to PMMA enhanced mechanical qualities while decreasing C. albicans adhesion [120].

Zirconium oxide nanoparticles reduce bacterial adhesion because they are insoluble in water [125]. Endodontists frequently use zirconium oxide nanoparticles as an antibacterial agent due to their potent antimicrobial properties against dental pathogens, including E. faecalis [67]. Research has shown that using zirconium oxide nanoparticles can differentiate E. faecalis and other bacteria [126]. Zirconium oxide nanoparticles showed marginally increased antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa but no change in antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and E. coli, according to Li et al. [127]. Another study found that MG63 osteosarcoma cells were more viable in vitro when exposed to 20 wt% zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Additionally, the nanoparticles sped up the degree of hydration by 26 % in the first 24 h [118].

Because of its more significant control of root canal disinfection compared to typical calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament, triple or double antibiotic paste has been suggested as a better [128]. The antimicrobial activity of a double antibiotic paste comprising either zirconium oxide or barium sulfate was studied by Verma et al. [128]. Zirconium oxide nanoparticle-containing double antibiotic paste had vigorous antibacterial activity [128]. Using microparticulated and nanoparticulated zirconium or niobium oxide, Tanomaru et al. studied the characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement, which are calcium silicate materials [119]. All the materials had promising antibacterial action against Candida albicans, E. faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. mutans, and K. rhizophila, although mineral trioxide aggregate demonstrated the highest radiopacity [119].

One radio-opacifier that has shown promise in endodontic treatment is zirconium oxide nanoparticles added to white Portland cement [129]. A more consistent microstructure over the entire canal length was demonstrated by Viapiana et al. for sealers that incorporate radio-pacifier nanoparticles [116]. Zirconium oxide nanoparticle loading improved the retention and sealing ability of epoxy resin- and Portland-based sealers by allowing them to penetrate dentinal tubules at the apical third [116]. In a study miming real-life oral circumstances, researchers found that root canal-filling materials made of zirconium oxide nanoparticles and polyacrylamide nanocomposite hydrogels performed better regarding radiopacity and stability [122]. According to the research conducted by Hu et al. zirconia oxide nanoparticles have an excellent radiopacity of 3 mm [130], which is in line with the recommendations made by the ISO/ADA.

Root canal sealer and root end filler materials should have bioactivity due to their extended proximity to the periapical connective tissues [115]. By adding nano and microparticles of zirconium oxide radio-opacifiers to innovative root canal sealers made of a combination of Portland cement, epoxy resin, and radio-opacifier, Viapiana et al. enhanced the bioactivity potential of these sealers and compared them to AH Plus and MTA Fillapex. There was little correlation between particle size and chemical characteristics, as demonstrated by the innovative root canal sealers [115]. Research by Huang et al. showed that bioactive glass-based root canals enhanced with zirconia oxide nanoparticles had higher radiopacity, better flow, and thinner sealer films [117]. Researchers Rahimi et al. found that human dental pulp stem cells' alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium ion release improved when combining zirconium oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles [121]. Additional research is required to make these findings more applicable to endodontic therapy.

5.6. Other metal and metal oxide nanoparticles

Gold, nickel, iron, copper, calcium, and cerium oxide nanoparticles have demonstrated diagnostic and therapeutic potential in dentistry [8,130]. Most of these nanoparticles, consisting of metals and metal oxides, have strong antibacterial properties against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [7]. Nanoparticles' unique physicochemical, biological, and antimicrobial characteristics have piqued interest in using them as dental materials [8]. Metal and metal oxide nanoparticle activity is typically dose- and time-dependent, pH- and mixture concentration, and distribution-dependent [7]. However, there is a lack of information regarding the use of these nanoparticles in dental materials and procedures. Thus, additional research is needed in this area.

6. Conclusion

Metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles, including those of silver, copper, gold, platinum, aluminum oxide (Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), copper oxide (CuO), cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co3O4), indium oxide (In2O3), magnesium oxide (MgO), silicon dioxide (SiO2), zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), chromium (III) oxide (Cr2O3), nickel (III) oxide (Ni2O3), manganese (III) oxide (Mn2O3), cobalt oxide (CoO), and nickel oxide (NiO), are members of the broader nanomaterial category and have been utilized across various medical fields. The unique physical and chemical properties of metal oxide nanoparticles have garnered significant attention. Generally, when used in sufficient concentrations to eradicate bacteria, these nanoparticles present minimal risk to humans. Due to their biocompatibility and antibacterial properties, some of these metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles are particularly well-suited for applications in nano-dentistry. Despite their numerous advantages, these nanoparticles have a tendency to aggregate and adhere to each other. Nevertheless, additional research is required to develop strategies that minimize the risks associated with the use of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in dental treatments.

7. Future directions

In summary, nanomaterials offer significant hope for combating diseases caused by oral bacteria, with the possibility of leading to long-term, sustained enhancement of the oral microenvironment. Current research is concentrating on creating disinfectants and sealants at the nanoscale, which aim to eliminate persistent pathogens in endodontic treatments and ensure a durable seal to ward off reinfection. Furthermore, investigations are underway to assess the biocompatibility and bioactivity of these materials, with the goal of confirming that they not only address the disease but also facilitate the regeneration of dental tissues. With the progression of nanotechnology, we anticipate the emergence of more advanced and efficient interventions utilizing nano metals and metal oxide, which are poised to transform the treatment of endodontic diseases. These innovations are likely to provide patients with better results and could decrease the need for more invasive procedures.

Funding

This study was supported by Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.

Availability of data and materials

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Roohollah Sharifi: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources. Ahmad Vatani: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation. Amir Sabzi: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Conceptualization. Mohsen Safaei: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Nikkerdar N., Golshah A., Mobarakeh M.S., Fallahnia N., Azizie B., Shoohanizad E., et al. Recent progress in application of zirconium oxide in dentistry. Journal of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry Research. 2024;6:1042–1071. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mallakpour S., Madani M. A review of current coupling agents for modification of metal oxide nanoparticles. Prog. Org. Coating. 2015;86:194–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Agarwal H., Nakara A., Shanmugam V.K. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of various metal and metal oxide nanoparticles synthesized using plant extracts: a review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;109:2561–2572. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moradpoor H., Safaei M., Mozaffari H.R., Sharifi R., Imani M.M., Golshah A., et al. An overview of recent progress in dental applications of zinc oxide nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2021;11(34):21189–21206. doi: 10.1039/d0ra10789a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Attarilar S., Yang J., Ebrahimi M., Wang Q., Liu J., Tang Y., et al. The toxicity phenomenon and the related occurrence in metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a brief review from the biomedical perspective. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8:822. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yadavalli T., Shukla D. Role of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles as diagnostic and therapeutic tools for highly prevalent viral infections. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2017;13(1):219–230. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nikolova M.P., Chavali M.S. Metal oxide nanoparticles as biomedical materials. Biomimetics. 2020;5(2):27. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics5020027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaudhary R.G., Bhusari G.S., Tiple A.D., Rai A.R., Somkuvar S.R., Potbhare A.K., et al. Metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: toxicity, applications, and future prospects. Curr. Pharmaceut. Des. 2019;25(37):4013–4029. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666191111091326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.El Shafey A.M. Green synthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles from plant leaf extracts and their applications: a review. Green Process. Synth. 2020;9(1):304–339. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoseinzadeh E., Makhdoumi P., Taha P., Hossini H., Stelling J., Amjad Kamal M. A review on nano-antimicrobials: metal nanoparticles, methods and mechanisms. Curr. Drug Metabol. 2017;18(2):120–128. doi: 10.2174/1389200217666161201111146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Annu Ali A., Ahmed Shakeel. Green synthesis of metal, metal oxide nanoparticles, and their various applications. Handbook of Ecomaterials. 2018;2018:1–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dizaj Solmaz Maleki, et al. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2014;44:278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vicario Parés U. 2016. Cellular and molecular responses of zebrafish to legacy and emerging pollutants: the specific cases of PAHs and metal oxide nanoparticles.https://ekoizpen-zientifikoa.ehu.eus/documentos/5ecb7f6b2999521315202cd1 [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Basque Country] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Safaei M., Moghadam A. Optimization of the synthesis of alginate-manganese oxide novel bionanocomposite by Taguchi design as antimicrobial dental impression material. Mater. Today Commun. 2022;31 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raghunath A., Perumal E. Metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: a promise for the future. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2017;49(2):137–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McNamara K., Tofail S.A. Nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Adv. Phys. X. 2017;2(1):54–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kwon H.J., Shin K., Soh M., Chang H., Kim J., Lee J., et al. Large‐scale synthesis and medical applications of uniform‐sized metal oxide nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2018;30(42) doi: 10.1002/adma.201704290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ivask A., Titma T., Visnapuu M., Vija H., Kakinen A., Sihtmae M., et al. Toxicity of 11 metal oxide nanoparticles to three mammalian cell types in vitro. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2015;15(18):1914–1929. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150506150109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jeevanandam J., Chan Y.S., Danquah M.K. Biosynthesis of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. ChemBioEng Rev. 2016;3(2):55–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Singh K.R., Nayak V., Singh J., Singh A.K., Singh R.P. Potentialities of bioinspired metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in biomedical sciences. RSC Adv. 2021;11(40):24722–24746. doi: 10.1039/d1ra04273d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ansarifard Elham, et al. Investigating the biocompatibility, flexural strength, and surface roughness of denture base resin containing copper oxide nanoparticles: an in vitro study. Heliyon. 2023;9(9) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19846. ‏. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chugh H., Sood D., Chandra I., Tomar V., Dhawan G., Chandra R. Role of gold and silver nanoparticles in cancer nano-medicine. Artif. Cell Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup1):1210–1220. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1449118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Medhi R., Marquez M.D., Lee T.R. Visible-light-active doped metal oxide nanoparticles: review of their synthesis, properties, and applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020;3(7):6156–6185. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stankic S., Suman S., Haque F., Vidic J. Pure and multi metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016;14(1):1–20. doi: 10.1186/s12951-016-0225-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Augustine R., Hasan A. Emerging applications of biocompatible phytosynthesized metal/metal oxide nanoparticles in healthcare. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020;56 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Razzaque S., Hussain S.Z., Hussain I., Tan B. Design and utility of metal/metal oxide nanoparticles mediated by thioether end-functionalized polymeric ligands. Polymers. 2016;8(4):156. doi: 10.3390/polym8040156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thambirajoo M., Maarof M., Lokanathan Y., Katas H., Ghazalli N.F., Tabata Y., et al. Potential of nanoparticles integrated with antibacterial properties in preventing biofilm and antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics. 2021;10(11):1338. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gold K., Slay B., Knackstedt M., Gaharwar A.K. Antimicrobial activity of metal and metal‐oxide based nanoparticles. Advanced Therapeutics. 2018;1(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saliani M., Jalal R., Goharshadi E.K. Effects of pH and temperature on antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanofluid against Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Staphylococcus aureus. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015;8(2) doi: 10.5812/jjm.17115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mohanraj R. Antimicrobial Nanoarchitectonics. Elsevier; 2017. Antimicrobial activities of metallic and metal oxide nanoparticles from plant extracts; pp. 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghiciuc C.M., Ghiciuc O.N., Ochiuz L., Lupuşoru C.E., editors. 2017 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB) IEEE; 2017. Antibacterial effects of metal oxides-containing nanomaterials in dentistry. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ng A.M.C., Guo M.Y., Leung Y.H., Chan C.M., Wong S.W., Yung M.M., et al. Metal oxide nanoparticles with low toxicity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015;151:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sengul A.B., Asmatulu E. Toxicity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020;18(5):1659–1683. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Djurišić A.B., Leung Y.H., Ng A.M., Xu X.Y., Lee P.K., Degger N., et al. Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles: mechanisms, characterization, and avoiding experimental artefacts. Small. 2015;11(1):26–44. doi: 10.1002/smll.201303947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dasari T.P., Pathakoti K., Hwang H.-M. Determination of the mechanism of photoinduced toxicity of selected metal oxide nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co3O4 and TiO2) to E. coli bacteria. J. Environ. Sci. 2013;25(5):882–888. doi: 10.1016/s1001-0742(12)60152-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bapat R.A., Joshi C.P., Bapat P., Chaubal T.V., Pandurangappa R., Jnanendrappa N., et al. The use of nanoparticles as biomaterials in dentistry. Drug Discov. Today. 2019;24(1):85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Al-Hijazi A.Y., Hasan N., Nasr B.K., Al-Khafaji H.H.J., Al-Khafaji B., Alanssari B.F.A., Jalil A.T. Recent advances in the use of inorganic nanomaterials as anti caries agents. Heliyon. 2023;9(4) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shrestha A., Kishen A. Antibacterial nanoparticles in endodontics: a review. J. Endod. 2016;42(10):1417–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ibrahim A., Petrik L., Moodley D., Patel N. Use of antibacterial nanoparticles in Endodontics. South African Dental Journal. 2017;72(3):105–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tong Z., Zhou L., Kuang R., Lv H., Qu T., Ni L. In vitro evaluation of MTAD and nisin in combination against common pathogens associated with root canal infection. J. Endod. 2012;38(4):490–494. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alsuraifi A. Metallic nanoparticles in dental biomaterials: a review. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020;3(1):27–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Behera K., Nasim I. Effect of nanoparticles based root canal disinfectants on Enterococcus faecalis-A systematic review. Int. J. Dent. Oral Sci. 2021;8(5):2898–2904. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hala F., Mohammed M., Thanaa I. Antibacterial effect of two types of nano particles incorporated in zinc oxide based sealers on Enterococcus faecalis (in vitro study) Alexandria Dental Journal. 2016;41(2):169–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wong J., Zou T., Lee A.H.C., Zhang C. The potential translational applications of nanoparticles in endodontics. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021;16:2087. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S293518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Palekar A., Garud S., Borse S., Deshpande Y., Palekar U., Biradar B. Nanoparticles and its implication in endodontics–A review. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2020:826–832. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Versiani M.A., Abi Rached-Junior F.J., Kishen A., Pécora J.D., Silva-Sousa Y.T., de Sousa-Neto M.D. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance physicochemical characteristics of Grossman sealer. J. Endod. 2016;42(12):1804–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Samiei M., Farjami A., Dizaj S.M., Lotfipour F. Nanoparticles for antimicrobial purposes in Endodontics: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2016;58:1269–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kishen A., Shi Z., Shrestha A., Neoh K.G. An investigation on the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of cationic nanoparticulates for root canal disinfection. J. Endod. 2008;34(12):1515–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kozuszko S.N., Sanchez M.A., de Ferro M.I.G., Sfer A.M., Madrid A.P.M., Takabatake K., et al. Antibacterial activity and biocompability of zinc oxide and graphite particles as endodontic materials. J. Hard Tissue Biol. 2017;26(4):311–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kontakiotis E.G., Tzanetakis G.N., Loizides A.L. A comparative study of contact angles of four different root canal sealers. J. Endod. 2007;33(3):299–302. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hadi S.A., Al-Mizraqchi A.S. Antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the growth of Enterococcus feacales, Candida and total root canal microbiota (in vitro study) Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2019;10(11) [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumar S.A., Dinesh S.S., George A.M., Jain R.K. Antimicrobial activity of silymarin mediated zinc oxide and hydroxy apatite nanoparticles against oral pathogens. Bioinformation. 2020;16(11):863. doi: 10.6026/97320630016863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nair N., James B., Devadathan A., Johny M.K., Mathew J., Jacob J. Comparative evaluation of antibiofilm efficacy of chitosan nanoparticle-and zinc oxide nanoparticle-incorporated calcium hydroxide-based sealer: an in vitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2018;9(3):434. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_225_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jowkar Z., Hamidi S.A., Shafiei F., Ghahramani Y. The effect of silver, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles used as final irrigation solutions on the fracture resistance of root-filled teeth. Clin. Cosmet. Invest. Dent. 2020;12:141. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S253251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.De Almeida J., Cechella B.C., Bernardi A.V., de Lima Pimenta A., Felippe W.T. Effectiveness of nanoparticles solutions and conventional endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2018;29(3):347. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_634_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sridevi A., Sindhu J., Naveen D., Nirupama D., Nainan M.T. Antibacterial effect of fluorinated graphene and zinc oxide nanoparticles incorporated in zinc oxide-based sealers on Enterococcus faecalis (in vitro study) Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences. 2019;6(2):81. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Alves M., Grenho L., Lopes C., Borges J., Vaz F., Vaz I., et al. Antibacterial effect and biocompatibility of a novel nanostructured ZnO-coated gutta-percha cone for improved endodontic treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2018;92:840–848. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chachlioutaki K., Karavasili C., Adamoudi E., Tsitsos A., Economou V., Beltes C., et al. Electrospun nanofiber films suppress inflammation in vitro and eradicate endodontic bacterial infection in an E. Faecalis-infected ex vivo human tooth culture model. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022;8(5):2096–2110. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang J., Du L., Fu Y., Jiang P., Wang X. ZnO nanoparticles inhibit the activity of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinomyces naeslundii and promote the mineralization of the cementum. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0780-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Javidi M., Zarei M., Omidi S., Ghorbani A., Gharechahi M., Rad M.S. Cytotoxicity of a new nano zinc-oxide eugenol sealer on murine fibroblasts. Iran. Endod. J. 2015;10(4):231. doi: 10.7508/iej.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jowkar Z., Omidi Y., Shafiei F. The effect of silver nanoparticles, zinc oxide nanoparticles, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020;12(3):e249. doi: 10.4317/jced.56126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Eskandarinezhad M., Ghodrati M., Azar F.P., Jafari F., Pakchin P.S., Abdollahi A.A., et al. Effect of incorporating hydroxyapatite and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the compressive strength of white mineral trioxide aggregate. J. Dent. 2020;21(4):300. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.82963.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.ElKateb W.M., Massoud A.G., Mokhless N.A., Shalaby T.I. Measurement of tubular penetration depth of three types of nanopartcles mixed with endodontic sealer using scanning electron microscope (an in vitro study) Journal of American Science. 2015;11(11):111–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Raura N., Garg A., Arora A., Roma M. Nanoparticle technology and its implications in endodontics: a review. Biomater. Res. 2020;24(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40824-020-00198-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hadi S.A., Al-Mizraqchi A.S. Antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles on the growth of Enterococcus feacales, Candida and total root canal microbiota (in vitro study) Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2020;11(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sihivahanan D., Nandini V.V. Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of titanium dioxide nanoparticle incorporated in composite resin as a core restorative material. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2021;22(6):686–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Elsaka S.E., Hamouda I.M., Swain M.V. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J. Dent. 2011;39(9):589–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Samiei M., Ghasemi N., Aghazadeh M., Divband B., Akbarzadeh F. Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate with TiO2 nanoparticles on human gingival fibroblasts. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017;9(2):e182. doi: 10.4317/jced.53126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Samiei M., Janani M., Asl-Aminabadi N., Ghasemi N., Divband B., Shirazi S., et al. Effect of the TiO2 nanoparticles on the selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2017;9(2) doi: 10.4317/jced.53166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Amin S.A.W. Influence of titanium dioxide incorporation on the compressive strength of modified calcium silicate-based cement. Egyptian dental journal. Dental Materials, Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2018;64:2737–2745. 3-July (Fixed Prosthodontics. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dsouza T.S., Hegde M.N., Radhakrishna V., Dsouza N., Kumari S. In vitro cytotoxic evaluation of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate with silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. World. 2019;10(6):433. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ramya G., Rajasekar A. Enhanced antibacterial effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles mediated grape seed extract on oral pathogens--Streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus. J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2021;10(22):1656–1662. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Şen B.H., Büyükyilmaz T. The effect of 4% titanium tetrafluoride solution on root canal walls—a preliminary investigation. J. Endod. 1998;24(4):239–243. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kanathila H., Pangi A.M., Patil S., Shirlal S., Jaiswal R. An insight in to various metallic oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobials and their applications in dentistry. J. Evol. Med. Dent. Sci. 2021;10(33):2803–2809. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sihivahanan D., Maniyan Vijayakumari M., Yadalam P.K., Boreak N., Binalrimal S., Alqahtani S.M., et al. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strength of fibre post with titanium dioxide nanoparticles as fillers in experimental dental composite resin. Materials. 2022;15(9):3312. doi: 10.3390/ma15093312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Takamiya A.S., Monteiro D.R., Bernabé D.G., Gorup L.F., Camargo E.R., Gomes-Filho J.E., et al. In vitro and in vivo toxicity evaluation of colloidal silver nanoparticles used in endodontic treatments. J. Endod. 2016;42(6):953–960. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vithiya K., Kumar R., Sen S. Antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized silver oxide nanoparticles. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2014;4:3263–3268. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sondi I., Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275(1):177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kung J.-C., Chen Y.-J., Chiang Y.-C., Lee C.-L., Yang-Wang Y.-T., Hung C.-C., et al. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) confined mesoporous structured bioactive powder against Enterococcus faecalis infecting root canal systems. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2018;502:62–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ambalavanan N., Kavitha M., Jayakumar S., Raj A., Nataraj S. Comparative evaluation of bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticle in combination with Nd-YAG laser against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2020;21(10):1142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kadhim W.A., Daily Z.A., Mohsen S.F., Chasib Y.H., editors. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2021. The inhibitory action of (Ag-nanoparticles) on microorganism in the root canal necrosis. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Corrêa J.M., Mori M., Sanches H.L., Cruz ADd, Poiate E., Poiate I.A.V.P. Silver nanoparticles in dental biomaterials. International journal of biomaterials. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/485275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mohan A., Dipallini S., Lata S., Mohanty S., Pradhan P., Patel P., et al. Oxidative stress induced antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan and silver nanoparticles coated Gutta-percha for endodontic applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2020;17 [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Dianat O., Ataie M. Gutta-percha coated with nanosilver particles. Invention registered. 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Charannya S., Duraivel D., Padminee K., Poorni S., Nishanthine C., Srinivasan M.R. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of silver nanoparticles and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate when used alone and in combination assessed using agar diffusion method: an in vitro study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2018;9(Suppl 2):S204. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_869_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Oncu A., Huang Y., Amasya G., Sevimay F.S., Orhan K., Celikten B. Silver nanoparticles in endodontics: recent developments and applications. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2021;46(3) doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.AlMufareh N.A., AlQhtani F.A., AlKhureif A. Comparing the effects of carbon-and silver oxide-particles on the physical and mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro study. Materials Express. 2021;11(2):271–277. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yousefshahi H., Aminsobhani M., Shokri M., Shahbazi R. Anti-bacterial properties of calcium hydroxide in combination with silver, copper, zinc oxide or magnesium oxide. European journal of translational myology. 2018;28(3) doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Naguib G.H., Nassar H.M., Hamed M.T. Antimicrobial properties of dental cements modified with zein-coated magnesium oxide nanoparticles. Bioact. Mater. 2022;8:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Khan A., Ameen F., Khan F., Al-Arfaj A., Ahmed B. Fabrication and antibacterial activity of nanoenhanced conjugate of silver (I) oxide with graphene oxide. Mater. Today Commun. 2020;25 [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Salas-Orozco M., Niño-Martínez N., Martínez-Castañón G.-A., Méndez F.T., Jasso M.E.C., Ruiz F. Mechanisms of resistance to silver nanoparticles in endodontic bacteria: a literature review. J. Nanomater. 2019;2019 [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Besinis A., De Peralta T., Handy R.D. The antibacterial effects of silver, titanium dioxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles compared to the dental disinfectant chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans using a suite of bioassays. Nanotoxicology. 2014;8(1):1–16. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2012.742935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Al-Khatib Z.Z., Baum R.H., Morse D.R., Yesilsoy C., Bhambhani S., Furst M.L. The antimicrobial effect of various endodontic sealers. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1990;70(6):784–790. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(90)90022-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Baras B.H., Melo M.A.S., Sun J., Oates T.W., Weir M.D., Xie X., et al. Novel endodontic sealer with dual strategies of dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate and nanoparticles of silver to inhibit root canal biofilms. Dent. Mater. 2019;35(8):1117–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Behnaz M., Kasraei S., Yadegari Z., Zare F., Nahvi G. 2021. Effects of Orthodontic Bonding Containing TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles on Prevention of White Spot Lesions: an in Vitro Study. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yin I.X., Zhang J., Zhao I.S., Mei M.L., Li Q., Chu C.H. The antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles and its application in dentistry. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020;15:2555. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S246764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bahador A., Pourakbari B., Bolhari B., Hashemi F.B. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of nanosilver-mineral trioxide aggregate against frequent anaerobic oral pathogens by a membrane-enclosed immersion test. Biomed. J. 2015;38(1):77–83. doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.132901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Prasad G., Govula K., Anumula L., Kumar P. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of silver nanoparticles, ascertaining their safety in the field of endodontic therapy. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization. 2021;13(2):109. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ioannidis K., Niazi S., Mylonas P., Mannocci F., Deb S. The synthesis of nano silver-graphene oxide system and its efficacy against endodontic biofilms using a novel tooth model. Dent. Mater. 2019;35(11):1614–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Lotfi M., Vosoughhosseini S., Ranjkesh B., Khani S., Saghiri M., Zand V. Antimicrobial efficacy of nanosilver, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate against Enterococcus faecalis. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011;10(35):6799–6803. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Topala F., Nica L.-M., Boariu M., Negrutiu M.L., Sinescu C., Marinescu A., et al. En-face optical coherence tomography analysis of gold and silver nanoparticles in endodontic irrigating solutions: an in vitro study. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;22(3):1–6. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Salas-Orozco M.F., Martínez N.N., Martínez-Castañón G.-A., Méndez F.T., Patiño-Marín N., Ruiz F. Detection of genes related to resistance to silver nanoparticles in bacteria from secondary endodontic infections. J. Nanomater. 2019;2019 [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Aydin H., Er K., Kuştarci A., Akarsu M., Gencer G., Er H., et al. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles activated by photodynamic therapy in infected root canals. Dental and Medical Problems. 2020;57(4) doi: 10.17219/dmp/123615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wu Z., Xu H., Xie W., Wang M., Wang C., Gao C., et al. Study on a novel antibacterial light-cured resin composite containing nano-MgO. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2020;188 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zhu X., Wu D., Wang W., Tan F., Wong P.K., Wang X., et al. Highly effective antibacterial activity and synergistic effect of Ag-MgO nanocomposite against Escherichia coli. J. Alloys Compd. 2016;684:282–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sun X., Sun A., Jia X., Jin S., Zhang D., Xiao K., et al. In vitro bioactivity of AH plus with the addition of nano-magnesium hydroxide. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8(6) doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Meng Y., Zhang D., Jia X., Xiao K., Lin X., Yang Y., et al. Antimicrobial activity of nano-magnesium hydroxide against oral bacteria and application in root canal sealer. Med. Sci. Mon. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res.: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2020;26:e922920–e922921. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Noori A.J., Kareem F.A. Setting time, mechanical and adhesive properties of magnesium oxide nanoparticles modified glass-ionomer cement. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020;9(2):1809–1818. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Noori A.J., Kareem F.A. The effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement. Heliyon. 2019;5(10) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ibrahim A.I. 2019. Nanoparticles as Advanced Treatment Modalities to Disinfect the Root Canal System. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Monzavi A., Eshraghi S., Hashemian R., Momen-Heravi F. In vitro and ex vivo antimicrobial efficacy of nano-MgO in the elimination of endodontic pathogens. Clin. Oral Invest. 2015;19(2):349–356. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1253-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Shorey P., Sidhu K., Bhushan J., Chhibber S., Bhardwaj S.B. Ex-Vivo evaluation of Nano-MgO in the elimination of Endodontic pathogen-E. faecalis. IP Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. 2022;6(4):222–227. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Viapiana R., Flumignan D., Guerreiro‐Tanomaru J., Camilleri J., Tanomaru‐Filho M. Physicochemical and mechanical properties of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide modified P ortland cement‐based experimental endodontic sealers. Int. Endod. J. 2014;47(5):437–448. doi: 10.1111/iej.12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Bosso-Martelo R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Viapiana R., Berbert F.L.C., Duarte M.A.H., Tanomaru-Filho M. Physicochemical properties of calcium silicate cements associated with microparticulate and nanoparticulate radiopacifiers. Clin. Oral Invest. 2016;20(1):83–90. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1483-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Rahimi S., Salarinasab S., Ghasemi N., Rahbarghazi R., Shahi S., Divband B., et al. In vitro induction of odontogenic activity of human dental pulp stem cells by white Portland cement enriched with zirconium oxide and zinc oxide components. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects. 2019;13(1):3. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hu C., Sun J., Long C., Wu L., Zhou C., Zhang X. Synthesis of nano zirconium oxide and its application in dentistry. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2019;8(1):396–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Franzin N.R.S., Sostena M.M.D.S., Santos ADd, Moura M.R., Camargo ERd, Hosida T.Y., et al. Novel pulp capping material based on sodium trimetaphosphate: synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial properties. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2022;30 doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Tanomaru J.M.G., Storto I., Da Silva G.F., Bosso R., Costa B.C., Bernardi M.I.B., et al. Radiopacity, pH and antimicrobial activity of Portland cement associated with micro-and nanoparticles of zirconium oxide and niobium oxide. Dent. Mater. J. 2014:2013–2328. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Viapiana R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J., Tanomaru-Filho M., Camilleri J. Interface of dentine to root canal sealers. J. Dent. 2014;42(3):336–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Priyadarsini S., Mukherjee S., Mishra M. Nanoparticles used in dentistry: a review. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. 2018;8(1):58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Khan S.T., Al-Khedhairy A.A. Elsevier; 2017. Metals and Metal Oxides: Important Nanomaterials with Antimicrobial Activity. Antimicrobial Nanoarchitectonics; pp. 195–222. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Viapiana R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Hungaro-Duarte M.A., Tanomaru-Filho M., Camilleri J. Chemical characterization and bioactivity of epoxy resin and Portland cement-based sealers with niobium and zirconium oxide radiopacifiers. Dent. Mater. 2014;30(9):1005–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Gowri S., Gandhi R.R., Sundrarajan M. Structural, optical, antibacterial and antifungal properties of zirconia nanoparticles by biobased protocol. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014;30(8):782–790. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Turo CT, Liguori F, Ciardelli G, Ferreira L, Rai A. Role of LL37-AuNPs in Antimicrobial Activity and Dental Application.
  • 125.Li Q., Coleman N.J. Hydration kinetics, ion-release and antimicrobial properties of white Portland cement blended with zirconium oxide nanoparticles. Dent. Mater. J. 2014;33(6):805–810. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Li Q., Deacon A.D., Coleman N.J. The impact of zirconium oxide nanoparticles on the hydration chemistry and biocompatibility of white Portland cement. Dent. Mater. J. 2013;32(5):808–815. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Verma R., Fischer B.I., Gregory R.L., Yassen G.H. The radiopacity and antimicrobial properties of different radiopaque double antibiotic pastes used in regenerative endodontics. J. Endod. 2018;44(9):1376–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Abou El Nasr H.M., Akbulut M.B. Dental Applications of Nanotechnology. Springer; 2018. Advanced nanomaterials and their functionalization in clinical endodontics; pp. 37–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Li W.J., Ma W.J., Meng Z.Q., Xia M.G., Wang X.F., Zhu M.F., editors. Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publ; 2015. Investigation of zirconia/polyacrylamide (ZrO2/PAAm) based nanocomposite hydrogels with enhanced X-ray radiopacity. [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Huang G., Liu S.-Y., Wu J.-L., Qiu D., Dong Y.-M. A novel bioactive glass-based root canal sealer in endodontics. J. Dent. Sci. 2022;17(1):217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES