Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 26;14(8):5358–5372. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1614

Table 4. Results of the univariate analysis and ROC analysis.

Parameter P value AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
DWI_maximum 0.0379 0.589 (0.513−0.663) 58.97 57.73 56.6
DWI_skewness 0.0185 0.601 (0.524−0.674) 67.96 51.55 56.6
D_kurtosis 0.0416 0.588 (0.511−0.662) 41.03 74.23 57.7
D_minimum 0.0130 0.604 (0.528−0.677) 76.92 44.33 57.1
D_skewness 0.0250 0.596 (0.519−0.669) 83.33 38.14 55.4
D*_energy 0.0063 0.621 (0.545−0.693) 38.74 87.63 65.1
D*_skewness 0.0081 0.613 (0.537−0.686) 76.92 49.48 57.7
f_minimum 0.0027 0.624 (0.548−0.696) 75.64 45.36 60.6
PCI 0.0002 0.645 (0.569−0.715) 53.85 71.13 64.0

ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; D, true diffusion coefficient; D*, pseudo-diffusion coefficient; f, perfusion fraction; PCI, percentage of rectal wall circumference invasion.