Table 3. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of CEUS TI-RADS in nodules of different sizes.
Group | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | ACC (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | AUC (95% CI) | Cutoff | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 93.2 | 75.5 | 85.2 | 83.0 | 89.0 | 0.898 (0.867–0.924) | 5 points | <0.001 |
A | 76.2 | 75.0 | 71.0 | 67.3 | 80.5 | 0.795 (0.721–0.857) | 6 points | <0.001 |
B | 95.9 | 88.1 | 92.8 | 92.6 | 93.2 | 0.949 (0.916–0.971) | 5 points | <0.001 |
C | 69.2 | 92.6 | 85.0 | 81.8 | 86.2 | 0.801 (0.644–0.910) | 5 points | <0.001 |
The nodules were grouped based on their size as follows: size ≤1 cm, group A; size >1 and ≤4 cm, group B; and size >4 cm, group C. CEUS TI-RADS, contrasted-enhanced ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; ACC, accuracy; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.