Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 30;14(8):5721–5736. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-457

Table 3. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of CEUS TI-RADS in nodules of different sizes.

Group SEN (%) SPE (%) ACC (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) AUC (95% CI) Cutoff P value
All 93.2 75.5 85.2 83.0 89.0 0.898 (0.867–0.924) 5 points <0.001
A 76.2 75.0 71.0 67.3 80.5 0.795 (0.721–0.857) 6 points <0.001
B 95.9 88.1 92.8 92.6 93.2 0.949 (0.916–0.971) 5 points <0.001
C 69.2 92.6 85.0 81.8 86.2 0.801 (0.644–0.910) 5 points <0.001

The nodules were grouped based on their size as follows: size ≤1 cm, group A; size >1 and ≤4 cm, group B; and size >4 cm, group C. CEUS TI-RADS, contrasted-enhanced ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; ACC, accuracy; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.