Skip to main content
. 2024 May 25;6(8):101125. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101125

Table 3.

Univariate Cox regression analysis for the evaluated BCA parameters.

Covariate HR 95% CI p value
SM normalized Continuous 0.9 0.8–0.9 <0.001
TAT normalized Continuous 0.9 0.8–1.0 0.013
IMAT normalized Continuous 1.0 0.9–1.0 0.310
SAT normalized Continuous 0.9 0.8–1.0 0.006
VAT normalized Continuous 0.9 0.9–1.0 0.150
SM/Bone (MBR) Continuous 0.7 0.6–0.8 <0.001
TAT/Bone Continuous 0.9 0.9–1.0 0.022
IMAT/Bone Continuous 0.1 0.0–92 0.300
SAT/Bone Continuous 0.3 0.1–1.0 0.057
VAT/Bone Continuous 0.4 0.1–2.3 0.280
Sarcopenia marker Continuous 0.7 0.6–0.9 <0.001
SM/height2∗∗ Continuous 1.0 0.9–1.0 0.0118
TAT/height2∗∗ Continuous 1.0 1.0–1.0 0.011
IMAT/height2∗∗ Continuous 0.5 0.1–1.6 0.210
SAT/height2∗∗ Continuous 0.8 0.6–0.9 0.009
VAT/height2∗∗ Continuous 0.8 0.6–1.1 0.110

p values in bold show significant values.

BCA, body composition assessment; IMAT, intermuscular adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; SM, skeletal muscle volume; TAT, total adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.

Normalized on the slice thickness.

∗∗

Height only available in n = 522 patients.