Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 22;20(19):1351–1366. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-1065

Table 1.

1L treatment regimens (mutually exclusive).

Treatment regimens Patients treated with 1L treatment, n (%) (n = 1286)
All patients receiving PB-CT 825 (64.2)
  Cisplatin or carboplatin + gemcitabine 304 (23.6)
  Paclitaxel + carboplatin 14 (1.1)
  Paclitaxel + carboplatin + gemcitabine 2 (0.2)
  Oxaliplatin + gemcitabine 2 (0.2)
  Cisplatin or carboplatin (mono) 12 (0.9)
  Moderately complex and intensive block CT (OPS 8-543; MVAC or gemcitabine + cisplatin) 491 (38.2)
All patients receiving IO 139 (10.8)
  Atezolizumab 21 (1.6)
  Pembrolizumab 71 (5.5)
  Nivolumab 47 (3.7)
All patients receiving other non–PB-CT 322 (25.0)
  Gemcitabine 79 (6.1)
  Paclitaxel + gemcitabine 10 (0.8)
  Paclitaxel 8 (0.6)
  Docetaxel 23 (1.8)
  Vinflunine 7 (0.5)
  Vinflunine + gemcitabine 6 (0.5)
  Noncomplex CT (OPS 8-542; gemcitabine or paclitaxel + gemcitabine or paclitaxel) 189 (14.7)

IOs for use in the 1L and 2L settings were first approved in the European Union beginning in late 2017.

During the patient inclusion period (2015–2019), nivolumab was not approved as a 1L IO and was only approved for use in the 2L setting in the European Union.

1L: First-line; 2L: Second-line; IO: Immunotherapy; mono: Monotherapy; MVAC: Methotrexate + vinblastine + doxorubicin + cisplatin; OPS: Operations and procedures key; PB-CT: Platinum-based chemotherapy.