Table A2. Quality of quantitative studies reviewed using the Effective Public Healthcare Panacea Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool (n=7).
Study (in alphabetical order) |
Selection bias | Study design | Confounding | Blinding | Data collection method | Withdrawal | Final rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Khani Jeihooni et al., 2021 | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Moderate |
Chu et al., 2021 | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Weak | Strong | Weak |
Larkey et al., 2012 | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Weak |
Lee et al., 2018 | Weak | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Weak | Strong | Weak |
Ma et al., 2022 | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Weak | Strong | Weak |
McDonough et al., 2016 | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Weak | Weak |
Olubodun et al., 2022 | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Weak |