Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 3;19(8):995–1004. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000458

Table 3.

eGFR slope during double-blind treatment using a random coefficient linear mixed-effect model (primary, N=30, and intention-to-treat, N=43, populations)

Primary Population (N=30)
Lademirsen (n=20) Placebo (n=10) Difference
LS mean (SEM) eGFR slope ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year −5 (1.9) −5 (2.7) −0 (3.3)
95% CI −8.7 to −1.1 −10.2 to 0.8 −6.9 to 6.5
ITT Population (N=43)
Lademirsen (n=29) Placebo (n=14) Difference
LS mean (SEM) eGFR slope ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year −9 (2.1) −7 (3.1) −2 (3.8)
95% CI −13.7 to −5.1 −13.2 to −0.7 −10.1 to 5.2

CI, confidence interval; ITT, intention to treat; LS, least squares.