Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 14;33(173):240035. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0035-2024

TABLE 2.

Impact of procedural and sampling variables on diagnostic yield

Variable Diagnostic yield (95% CI) p-value, R2 analogue#
GA versus sedation 0.83 (0.81–0.85) versus 0.75 (0.69–0.80) p=0.007
ILD MDM prior to cryobiopsy versus no ILD MDM 0.82 (0.8–0.84) versus 0.76 (0.72–0.81) p=0.02
2.4 mm versus 1.9 mm size cryoprobe 0.82 (0.77–0.87) versus 0.75 (0.71–0.79) p=0.04
Higher mean FVC (% pred) Coefficient 0.0063 (0.0001–0.013) p=0.046, R2=0.24
Higher mean DLCO (% pred) Coefficient 0.0063 (0.0001–0.013) p=0.022, R2=0.35
Single lobe versus one or more lobes 0.74 (0.067–0.82) versus 0.81 (0.78–0.85) p=0.08
Mean number of biopsies Coefficient −0.017 (−0.055–0.022) p=0.40, R2=0.0
Lower lobes targeted for biopsy versus not targeted 0.81 (0.74–0.88) versus 0.79 (0.77–0.82) p=0.61
Review by a single pathologist versus >1 pathologist 0.78 (0.71–0.85) versus 0.80 (0.72–0.89) p=0.69
DPLD versus non-DPLD (inclusion criteria) 0.80 (0.75–0.85) versus 0.79 (0.77–0.82) p=0.79

#: Reported for meta-regression analyses. DLCO: diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; DPLD: diffuse parenchymal lung disease; FVC: forced vital capacity; GA: general anaesthesia; ILD: interstitial lung disease; MDM: multidisciplinary meeting.