Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 14;33(173):240035. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0035-2024

TABLE 4.

Impact of procedural and sampling variables on moderate-to-severe bleeding

Variable Moderate-to-severe bleeding (95% CI) p-value, R2 analogue#
2.4 mm versus 1.9 mm size of cryoprobe 0.12 (0.08–0.16) versus 0.05 (0.03–0.07) p=0.001
Use of BTS bleeding score versus non-BTS bleeding score 0.07 (0.02–0.13) versus 0.13 (0.11–0.15) p=0.04
Mean age Coefficient 0.0034 (−0.0006–0.0073) p=0.097, R2=0.0
GA versus sedation 0.11 (0.08–0.13) versus 0.15 (0.1–0.2) p=0.13
Lower lobes targeted versus no lobes targeted 0.15 (0.1–0.2) versus 0.12 (0.1–0.14) p=0.23
Mean DLCO Coefficient −0.0038 (−0.01–0.0028) p=0.26, R2=0.08
Fluoroscopy (sole imaging guidance) versus no imaging guidance 0.11 (0.09–0.13) versus 0.15 (0.08–0.22) p=0.26
Single lobe versus one or more lobe sampling 0.16 (0.01–0.3) versus 0.08 (0.06–0.1) p=0.29
Mean number of biopsies Coefficient 0.015 (−0.015–0.044) p=0.33, R2=0.0
Prophylactic EBB versus no EBB 0.14 (0.11–0.18) versus 0.13 (0.08–0.18) p=0.65
Mean FVC Coefficient −0.0001 (−0.0065–0.0062) p=0.97, R2=0.0

#: Reported for meta-regression analyses. BTS: British Thoracic Society; DLCO: diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; EBB: endobronchial blocker; FVC: forced vital capacity; GA: general anaesthesia.