Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 14;24:264. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03329-1

Table 2.

Predictive factors for improvement of dysphagia score to ≤ 1 on univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI P Value OR 95% CI P Value
Age (years)

< 75

≥ 75

1

5.75

-

1.04–31.70

-

0.04

1

0.85

-

0.08–8.73

-

0.89

Sex

Male

Female

1

0.28

-

0.05–1.62

-

0.15

BMI, kg/m2

≥ 18.5

< 18.4

1

0.69

-

0.22–2.22

-

0.54

ECOG PS

2

3–4

1

0.42

-

0.13–1.39

-

0.16

Pathology

SCC

Others

1

1.30

-

0.20–8.59

-

0.79

Comorbidity index

0

≥ 1

1

0.96

-

0.30–3.08

-

0.94

Clinical T stage*

cT3

cT4

1

0.27

-

0.08–0.92

-

0.04

1

0.36

-

0.07–1.94

-

0.24

Clinical N stage*

N0

N1-3

1

1.25

-

0.31–5.08

-

0.76

Clinical M stage*

M0

M1

1

0.59

-

0.18–1.90

-

0.38

Dysphagia score

2

3–4

1

0.25

-

0.07–0.88

-

0.03

1

0.16

-

0.03–0.94

-

0.04

Primary tumor length, cm

< 7.0

≥ 7.0

1

0.37

-

0.11–1.26

-

0.11

Number of metastatic sites

0–1

≥ 2

1

0.63

-

0.16–2.44

-

0.50

Primary tumor location

Thoracic

GEJ

1

0.52

-

0.08–3.46

-

0.50

GPS

0

1–2

1

0.10

-

0.03–0.39

-

< 0.01

1

0.07

-

0.01–0.40

-

< 0.01

*Cancer staging followed the Union for International Cancer Control 8th edition guidelines. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; GEJ: gastro-esophageal junction; GPS: Glasgow Prognostic Score