. 2024 May 10;33(Suppl 1):e2013. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2013

TABLE 3.

Individual‐level concordance of mania/hypomania diagnoses based on the original and recalibrated CIDI compared to diagnoses based on the SCID in the clinical calibration sample (n = 485). ^a

Original CIDI

Recalibrated CIDI

Est

(SE)

Est

(SE)

Prevalence ^b

3.8

(0.5)

4.7

(0.7)

9.8

(5.4)

38.3

(13.2)

96.3

(0.5)

96.2

(0.6)

PPV

6.6

(3.3)

21.4

(6.6)

NPV

97.6

(0.8)

98.3

(0.7)

TCA

94.1

(0.9)

94.7

(0.9)

AUC

0.53

0.67

χ_{1}^{2}

6.6 ^c

20.9 ^c

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SE, standard error of Est; SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; TCA, total classification accuracy.

^{^a}

The calculations are based on a weighted version of the WMHQ clinical calibration sample that adjusted for the over‐sampling of respondents with CIDI diagnoses.

^{^b}

SCID prevalence is 2.6% (0.8).

^{^c}

Significant at the 0.05 level, two‐sided test.