. 2024 May 10;33(Suppl 1):e2013. doi: 10.1002/mpr.2013

TABLE 4.

Individual‐level concordance of panic disorder diagnoses based on the original and recalibrated CIDI compared to diagnoses based on the SCID in the clinical calibration sample (n = 485). ^a

Original CIDI

Recalibrated CIDI

Est

(SE)

Est

(SE)

Prevalence ^b

3.3

(0.5)

2.0

(0.4)

42.8

(11.7)

51.6

(12.7)

97.4

(0.4)

98.9

(0.3)

PPV

23.2

(5.9)

46.9

(9.3)

NPV

98.9

(0.4)

99.1

(0.4)

TCA

96.4

(0.6)

98.1

(0.5)

AUC

0.70

0.75

χ_{1}^{2}

16.9 ^c

0.4

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SE, standard error of Est; SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; TCA, total classification accuracy.

^{^a}

The calculations are based on a weighted version of the WMHQ clinical calibration sample that adjusted for the over‐sampling of respondents with CIDI diagnoses.

^{^b}

SCID prevalence is 1.8% (0.5).

^{^c}

Significant at the 0.05 level, two‐sided test.