Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 28;15(8):e01021-24. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01021-24

Fig 8.

Comparison of Imd2-GFP expression in wild-type and attenuator mutant strains under guanine and MPA treatments. Graphs depict fold-change in GFP expression and cell confluence over 50 hours, with microscopy images of GFP fluorescence in both strains.

Deletion of nonproductive “G” transcription start sites from IMD2 increases basal Imd2-GFP levels 10-fold and abolishes guanine sensitivity. (A) Imd2-GFP expression in the attenuator mutant strain (ELS107) compared with wild-type cells (KES002) after 0.5 hours of perfusion with untreated media based on seven experiments and at least two technical replicates per experiment. Imd2-GFP levels were normalized to the average Imd2-GFP expression of wild-type cells during the first hour of perfusion with untreated media. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Based on a two-tailed t-test, P value = 4 × 10−12. (B) Images showing the Imd2-GFP channel after 0.5 hours of perfusion with untreated media for wild-type KES002 cells (left) or attenuator mutant ELS107 cells (right). (C) Top panel: population mean Imd2-GFP fold induction (solid lines) with one standard deviation above and below the mean (shaded area) for attenuator mutant (ELS107) and wild-type (KES002) cells perfused with untreated media or 400 µM guanine (see key). Bottom panel: the percentage of the viewing field occupied by cells over time. (D) Population mean Imd2-GFP fold-induction averaged over three separate experiments (solid lines) with one standard deviation above and below the mean (shaded area) for attenuator mutant (ELS107) and wild-type (KES002) cells perfused with 1.5 µg/mL MPA or MPA with 400 µM guanine (see key).