Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 12;13(8):19. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.8.19

Table 2.

Treatment Effect of Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure SML Treatment (n = 37) Spironolactone Treatment (n = 39) χ2/t P
Resolution of SRF, n (%) 2.03 0.362
 Total 22 (59.5) 17 (43.6)
 Partial 8 (21.6) 13 (33.3)
 None 7 (18.9) 9 (23.1)
Resolution time of SRF (months), mean ± SD 1.45 ± 1.01 1.39 ± 1.24 0.18 0.855
Number of treatments required to be effective, mean ± SD 1.45 ± 0.51
Resolution of SRF at 1 month, n (%) 0.02 0.890
 Yes 12 (27.9) 12 (29.3)
 No 31 (72.1) 29 (70.7)
Recurrence of SRF within 6 months, n (%) 2 (9.1) (n = 22) 6 (35.3) (n = 17) 0.059
BCVA, mean ± SD
 At first evaluation visit 0.37 ± 0.40 0.37 ± 0.40 0.651
 At final evaluation visit 0.38 ± 0.44 0.43 ± 0.43 0.430
SRF, mean ± SD
 Height (µm)
  At first evaluation visit 111.45 ± 82.69 99.50 ± 73.85 0.348
  At final evaluation visit 55.07 ± 72.52 85.93 ± 90.55 0.475
 Longest diameter (µm)
  At first evaluation visit 2497.45 ± 1838.48 1802.91 ± 1287.82 0.082
  At final evaluation visit 1244.03 ± 1571.81, 1679.57 ± 1539.48 0.920
 Area (mm2)
  At first evaluation visit 0.21 ± 0.29 0.12 ± 0.12 0.036*
  At final evaluation visit 0.08 ± 0.12 0.13 ± 0.19 0.202
 CRT
  At first evaluation visit 279.79 ± 110.69 266.43 ± 89.82 0.357
  At final evaluation visit 222.15 ± 94.90 257.27 ± 102.28, 0.135
*

Significant differences were found between the SML group and the spironolactone group.

Significant differences compared to the baseline data.

Significant differences were found compared to the first evaluation visit.