Table 4.
Methods | Topic identification | Working group and conflict of interest develop initial draft | Systematic search | Recommendation (level of evidence and strength of recommendations) | Consensus and draft formation | External review | Final draft | Publication | Citations | Update | Update citations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dutch College of General Practitioners | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 37,46,50,64,70,73 | 5–10 years/evidence | 32–35,40,42–45,48,51–53,60–63,65,67–69,72,75,77,78,80,82,84–87,89 |
College of Family Physicians of Canada | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 36,56,90 | 6 years/evidence | |
German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 39,49,55,71,76,81,83 | 47,79 | |
Domus Medica (Belgian College) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 5 years | 66 | ||
American Academy of Family Physicians | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 5 years/evidence | 47,55,71 | |
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 91 | 3–5 years | 57–59,74,88 |