Table 3.
Exposure | Outcome | SNPs | Method | Beta (95% CI) | P | PQ | PInt | PG | Power (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HannumAge | CCT | 41 | IVW | −0.85 (−1.57 to −0.14) | 0.019 | 0.900 | 0.343 | 0.906 | 100 |
MR-Egger | −1.65 (−3.43 to 0.13) | 0.077 | |||||||
MR-PRESSO | −0.85 (−1.46 to −0.24) | 0.009 | |||||||
WM | −0.86 (−1.89 to 0.17) | 0.101 | |||||||
IEAA | CCT | 55 | IVW | −0.63 (−1.18 to −0.08) | 0.024 | 0.694 | 0.781 | 0.693 | 100 |
MR-Egger | −0.46 (−1.74 to 0.82) | 0.480 | |||||||
MR-PRESSO | −0.63 (−1.15 to −0.11) | 0.021 | |||||||
WM | −0.49 (−1.28 to 0.29) | 0.218 | |||||||
PhenoAge | mRNFL | 34 | IVW | 0.06 (0.01 to 0.11) | 0.027 | 0.692 | 0.153 | 0.698 | 100 |
MR-Egger | −0.02 (−0.13 to 0.10) | 0.770 | |||||||
MR-PRESSO | 0.06 (0.01 to 0.11) | 0.023 | |||||||
WM | 0.05 (−0.03 to 0.13) | 0.200 | |||||||
GCP | IOP | 30 | IVW | −3.03 (−5.86 to −0.20) | 0.036 | 0.210 | 0.417 | 0.200 | 100 |
MR-Egger | −5.93 (−13.40 to 1.53) | 0.130 | |||||||
MR-PRESSO | −3.03 (−5.86 to −0.20) | 0.044 | |||||||
WM | −2.97 (−6.99 to 1.05) | 0.147 | |||||||
PAI-1 | IOP | 36 | IVW | 0.0001 (0.00002 to 0.0002) | 0.015 | 0.496 | 0.753 | 0.523 | 100 |
MR-Egger | 0.0001 (0.00001 to 0.0002) | 0.042 | |||||||
MR-PRESSO | 0.0001 (0.00002 to 0.0002) | 0.019 | |||||||
WM | 0.0001 (−0.00005 to 0.0002) | 0.259 | |||||||
IOP | PAI-1 | 18 | IVW | 0.26 (0.01 to 0.50) | 0.041 | 0.326 | 0.767 | 0.317 | 100 |
MR-Egger | 0.40 (−0.56 to 1.36) | 0.429 | |||||||
MR-PRESSO | 0.26 (0.01 to 0.50) | 0.057 | |||||||
WM | 0.20 (−0.14 to 0.53) | 0.257 |
CCT, central corneal thickness; IOP, intraocular pressure; mRNFL, macular retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; PAI-1, DNAm-based plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels; GCP, DNAm-based granulocyte proportions; IEAA, intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration; TSMR, two-sample Mendelian randomization; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR-PRESSO, Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier; WM, weighted median; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; PQ was the P value derived from Cochran’s Q test using IVW method. PInt was the P value derived from MR-Egger intercept. PG was the P value derived from MR-PRESSO global test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant