Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 30;58(32):14249–14259. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c04545

Table 3. Comparison of PolyP Quantification Methods for Planktonic Samples.

method applicable samples summary of pros, cons, and recommendations
DAPI fluorescence22 all samples, cultured and environmental, freshwater and marine pros: sensitive, easy operation, has been commonly used in environmental samples
cons: high risk of overestimation due to interferences
recommendations: should not be used as the sole method for polyP quantification
PPX digestion27 only freshwater cultures pros: has been commonly used for various model unicellular organisms.
cons: the activity of the enzyme in samples can be difficult to control and inhibitory molecules may cause interference, not working in marine plankton cultures and environmental samples
recommendations: not recommended for environmental samples and marine cultures, unless other methods are also used to validate the results
JC-D7 fluorescence (this study) all samples, cultured and environmental, freshwater and marine pros: sensitive, easy operation, stable, and can work in various extractants and buffers; polyP specific and has no nucleic acid interference
cons: has not been widely used (the dye is newly found).
recommendations: if lysing agents other than those recommended in this paper are used, the fluorescence response (linearity and detection limit) should be tested, especially for lysing reagents with high salt contents