Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 1;15:1417851. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1417851

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Efficacy of NanoBEO on disruptiveness of agitation based on the CMAI-D scores during treatment and follow-up (A) and as individual data at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment (B); data are expressed as the median + IQR. Patients allocated to the NanoBEO group experienced a reduction in CMAI-D scores than did patients allocated to the placebo group. (C) Statistically significant differences regarding NanoBEO efficacy were observed for all time points versus baseline (data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; time factor ****p < 0.0001; participant matching ****p < 0.0001; NanoBEO: 2 weeks **p < 0.01; 4, 6 and 8 weeks ***p < 0.001). *p values <0.05 indicate statistical significance. n: NanoBEO = 14, placebo = 16.