Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 15;15:7036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50334-9

Fig. 2. Deployment performance of the well pad detection pipeline assessed against reported well pad datasets.

Fig. 2

a, b We examined the recall rates of the well pad detection pipeline assessed against the Enverus35 and HIFLD Open Data16 well pad datasets for both active well pads in the reported data and against all well pads (active + inactive). Our methodology for classifying well pads as active/inactive relies mainly on leveraging the “Well Status” properties of the Enverus and HIFLD datasets (Supplementary Note 1).