Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 15;15:7036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50334-9

Table 1.

Test set results of the well pad detection pipeline for the Permian and Denver basins individually and together (“Overall”)

Average precision (mean ± SD) Precision (mean ± SD) Recall (mean ± SD)
Permian 0.959 ± 0.002 0.975 ± 0.003 0.906 ± 0.005
Denver 0.928 ± 0.003 0.935 ± 0.005 0.901 ± 0.007
Overall 0.944 ± 0.002 0.955 ± 0.004 0.904 ± 0.006

Because positive examples were downloaded centered around well pads, we used stochastic data augmentations (random cropping and scaling) when evaluating the model to simulate the distribution of well pads during deployment to the full basins, where well pads are rarely centered in the image. As such, the results are reported as the mean and standard deviation (SD) across 10 runs.