Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 15;10:157. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00770-7

Table 4.

Baseline characteristics of IRBD patients stratified according to clinical follow-up in non-converters, PD converters, and DLB converters

Non-converters Converted to PD Converted to DLB P value
N 100 24 23
Female, n (%) 22 (22.0) 7 (29.2) 6 (26.1) 0.731
Age at LP, yrs 67.7 ± 10.6 71.7 ± 6.1 73.5 ± 5.8 0.0104a
Age at IRBD diagnosis, yrs 65.3 ± 10.1 68.6 ± 5.5 68.9 ± 7.2 0.126
Time from IRBD diagnosis to LP, yrs 1.4 (0.4–3.6) 1.9 (0.5–4.5) 4.3 (0.5–6.5) 0.0218a
Prodromal PD rate at LP, % 76.2 ± 31.5 92.7 ± 16.6 95.7 ± 10.5 0.0005b,c
DAT-SPECT abnormal/tested, n (%) 48/97 (49.5) 20/24 (83.3) 15/23 (65.2) 0.0079c
UPSIT-40 score 21.0 (15.5–27.0) 19.0 (14.5–22.5) 15.0 (12.3–17.8) 0.0139a
Mild cognitive impairment at LP, n (%) 12 (12.0) 6 (25.0) 15 (65.2) <0.0001d,e
AS positivity, n (%) 68 (68.0) 20 (86.9) 21 (95.5) 0.0095b
A+T+N+, n (%) 8 (8.4) 2 (8.7) 3 (13.0) 0.786
A+T+, n (%) 10 (10.6) 3 (13.0) 3 (13.0) 0.907
A+T-, n (%) 18 (18.9) 6 (26.1) 8 (34.6) 0.224
42/Aβ40 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.8 (0.7–0.9) 0.7 (0.5–0.8) 0.055
p-tau, pg/mL 37 (28–47) 35 (26–50) 41 (34–51) 0.212
p-tau/Aβ42 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 0.6 (0.6–0.9) 0.8 (0.6–1.5) 0.0008e
t-tau, pg/mL 292 (219–376) 236 (182–329) 285 (247–363) 0.112
NfL, pg/mL 542 (412–751) 540 (339–751) 606 (507–794) 0.489

Follow-up information was available in 147 patients, CSF AD core biomarkers in 95 non-converters, 23 PD converters, and 23 DLB converters; CSF NfL in 98 non-converters, 22 PD converters, and 22 DLB converters.

p values indicating statistically significant differences between groups are highlighted in bold.

LP lumbar puncture, IRBD isolated REM sleep behavior disorder, PD Parkinson disease, DLB dementia with Lewy bodies, AS misfolded α-synuclein, 42 42 amino acid isoform of amyloid-beta, 40 amino acid isoform of amyloid-beta, p-tau phosphorylated tau protein, A amyloid-beta, T tau, NfL neurofilament light chain, t-tau total tau protein.

aDLB converters vs non-converters, p < 0.05.

bDLB converters vs non-converters, p < 0.01.

cPD converters vs non-converters, p < 0.01.

dDLB converters vs non-converters, p < 0.0001.

eDLB converters vs PD converters, p < 0.001.