Table 3.
Binary regression analysis; dependent variable: groups with doping and without doping (sports persons and no sports persons)
| B | SE | Wald | Df | p | Exp (B) | CI lower | CI upper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTQ (physical neglect) | −0.09 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 1.18 |
| CTQ (emotional neglect) | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 1.03 | 0.89 | 1.18 |
| Gender | 0.69 | 0.58 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 1.99 | 0.64 | 6.20 |
| LOT (pessimism) | −0.14 | 0.44 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.37 | 2.05 |
| LOT (optimism) | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.21 | 0.46 | 3.16 |
| Social support | 1.29 | 0.56 | 5.34 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 3.64 | 1.22 | 10.92 |
| BDI-II (depression) | −0.12 | 0.05 | 7.50 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| NEO-FFI (neuroticism) | 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.11 | 1,00 | 0.75 | 1.25 | 0.32 | 4.93 |
| NEO-FFI (extraversion) | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.34 | 1.60 | 0.60 | 4.22 |
| Sense of coherence | −0.24 | 0.08 | 9.44 | 1.00 | 0.002 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.92 |
| ASI (physical concerns) | 0.01 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.24 | 4.27 |
| ASI (mental incapacitation concerns) | −0.14 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.23 | 3.23 |
| ASI (social concerns) | 0.18 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 1.20 | 0.36 | 4.04 |
| TAS-20 (identify feelings) | −2.10 | 0.60 | 12.19 | 1.00 | 0.000 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.40 |
Binary regression analysis: B regression coefficient, SE standard error, Wald Wald statistics with dregrees of freedom (Df) and calculated p-value (the figures in italics show the significant values (p < 0.05)), Exp (B) effect strength equates to Odds-Ratio, CI 95%-confidence intervall lower and upper for Exp (B), CTQ childhood trauma questionnaire, LOT life orientation test, BDI Beck depression inventory, FFI 5-factor inventory, ASI anxiety sensitivity index, TAS Toronto alexithymia scale