Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2024 Apr 17;61(9):e14591. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14591

Table 5.

Adjusted fitted models of the association among TMS-iTBS cortico-motor plasticity, self-efficacy, and exercise adherence.

Adjusted Model β Coefficients (95% CI) SE Adj R-squared p-value
Adjusted Model 1 a
Constant 71.9 2.7 .43 <.0001b
Post10–20%Δ −7.78 (−13.7, −1.9) 2.8 .013b
Self-efficacy −0.51 (−.92, −.09) 0.19 .019b
Adjusted Model 2 (F5,18 = 2.96, p = .053)
Constant 71.53 23.1 .35 .0084b
Self-efficacy −0.46 (−0.9, 0.02) 0.22 .058
Post10–20%Δ −8.30 (−14.9, −1.7) 3.05 .017b
Estimated VO2 peak 0.25 (−0.5, 1.1) 0.37 .50
Age −0.10 (−0.7, 0.5) 0.30 .75
Gender (Male) −0.72 (−4.8, 3.4) 1.90 .71

Abbreviations. Post10–20%Δ= percent change in the TMS-iTBS cortico-motor plasticity index measure from baseline to interval 10–20 minutes; Estimated VO2 peak estimated oxygen consumption at exercise peak; SE= Standard Error; CI= Confidence Interval.

Note.

a =

Prediction equation for adjusted model 1: Exercise adherence (days)= 71.9 +(−7.78 * T10–20%Δ) + (−0.51 * Self-efficacy)

b =

significant uncorrected p-value