Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 17;260(3):75. doi: 10.1007/s00425-024-04502-2

Table 4.

Effect of different extraction or processing methods on phytochemical contents of Finger millet

Extraction or processing methods Effect on phytochemical content References
Acidic methanol extraction (1% HCl-method) at different pH and temperature

Polyphenol content was independent of temperature

Total phenolic content decreased from 6.4% to 2.5% at pH 3 and pH 10 respectively

Chethan and Malleshi (2007)
Ultrasonication (UA) and enzyme pretreatment in the utrasonication (EUA

Twofold increase in phenolic content

1.3-fold increase in flavonoids

1.2-fold increase in tannins by EUA with xylanase (XUA)

Balasubramaniam et al. (2019)
Use of 80% methanol The total phenolic content of brown and reddish varieties was ~ 302 mg FAE/100 g DW and ~ 292 mg FAE /100 g DW which is higher than the total phenolic content of white variety i.e. ~ 172 mg FAE/100 g Xiang et al. (2018)
Pressure cooking, open-pan boiling, and microwave-heating and sprouting Bioaccessibility of polyphenols reduced by 30–35% by pressure cooking, open-pan boiling, and microwave-heating while sprouting increased the bioaccessibility of polyphenols by 67% Hithamani and Srinivasan (2014)

FAE ferulic acid equivalent, DW dry weight