Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 13;3(5):612–614. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.03.003

Table 2.

Comparison of Treatment and Response Outcomes for Patients With and Without Esophageal Candidiasis

Treament characteristic No candidiasis (n = 466) Candidiasis (n = 34) Pa
Type of steroid used (n, %) .05
 Fluticasone 140 (30) 17 (50)
 Budesonide 325 (70) 17 (50)
 Ciclesonide 1 (< 1) 0 (0)
Mean steroid dose (mcg ± SD) 1688 ± 724 1849 ± 505 .20
Symptom response (n, %)b 122 (75) 20 (87) .22
Post-treatment peak eosinophil count (mean eos/hpf ± SD) 26.2 ± 38.1 8.8 ± 20.0 .009
 P value vs baseline <.001 <.001
Histologic response (n, %)
 < 15 eos/hpf 252 (54) 29 (85) <.001
 ≤ 6 eos/hpf 222 (48) 25 (74) .004
 < 1 eos/hpf 133 (29) 14 (41) .12
Post-treatment endoscopic findings (n, %)
 Exudates 113 (24) 11 (32) .30
 Rings 205 (44) 15 (44) .99
 Edema 138 (30) 7 (21) .26
 Furrows 220 (47) 9 (26) .02
 Stricture 141 (30) 14 (41) .18
 Narrowing 77 (17) 5 (15) .78
 Crepe-paper mucosa 4 (1) 0 (0) .59
 Dilation 139 (30) 13 (38) .30
Endoscopic response (n, %) 324 (70) 31 (91) .008
Post-treatment endoscopic severity (mean scores ± SD)
 EREFSc 2.3 ± 1.9 1.7 ± 1.4 .14
 P value vs baseline <.001 <.001
 ESSc 1.76 ± 1.5 1.65 ± 1.4 .67
 P value vs baseline <.001 <.001
a

Means between compared with 2-sample t-test; means among groups compared with a paired t-test; proportions compared with chi-squared.

b

Available for 162 without candidiasis and 23 with candidiasis; EREFS, EoE endoscopic reference score.

c

Available for 261 without candidiasis and 24 with candidiasis; ESS, Endoscopic Severity Score, for which all data available.