Table 2.
Definition | Abnormal findings | Considerations | |
---|---|---|---|
Coronary flow reserve (CFR) | Ratio of coronary flow during hyperemia vs rest | Low CFR with no visualized angiographic obstruction may indicate CMD | Cannot be used independently to diagnose CMD because it reflects both epicardial and microvascular disease and is dependent on hemodynamic factors58 |
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) | Pressure difference proximal and distal to a given stenosis in response to intracoronary dilation with adenosine or papaverine | FFR > 0.80 and CFR ≤ 2.5 is consistent with CMD; FFR < 0.80 and CFR ≤ 2.5 is consistent with epicardial disease alone or mixed epicardial obstruction and CMD. | In comparison to FFR, CFR has greater prognostic value for adverse cardiac events in the absence of obstructive CAD and may be more useful for risk stratification in the setting of suspected CMD.63,64 |
Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) | Minimal achievable microvascular resistance | IMR ≥ 25 is consistent with CMD | Specific to microcirculation and independent of hemodynamic factors and epicardial stenosis,65 making it a specific and reproducible measure of CMD.66 |
Acetylcholine (ACh) testing | Injection of intracoronary ACh followed by assessment of coronary artery diameter, ECG changes, and patient symptoms | Reduction of coronary artery diameter <90% with ACh is consistent with endothelial dysfunction; ≥90% is consistent with epicardial vasospasm; ECG changes and symptoms only is consistent with microvascular spasm | Safe method of assessing endothelial dysfunction and coronary vasospasm |
CAD, coronary artery disease; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; ECG, electrocardiogram.